DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2132a assigned to woggle, comex, BobTHJ
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I intend, with the consent of the rest of the panel, to REMAND this >> case to Sgeo, so that e might judge the case again while thinking more >> clearly, and also consider the precedent of CFJ 1771. > > Appeals are support (not consent) now, so you probably need to do that > to a public forum. Nevertheless, I support that intent. The quoted intent was sent to a public forum.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2132a assigned to woggle, comex, BobTHJ
comex wrote: > Having achieved 2 support, I judge this ancient appeal REASSIGN. Ineffective, panel already recused (and even if it hadn't been, more than 14 days have elapsed since the relevant statement of intent).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2132a assigned to woggle, comex, BobTHJ
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 19:12, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I intend, with the consent of the rest of the panel, to REMAND this >>> case to Sgeo, so that e might judge the case again while thinking more >>> clearly, and also consider the precedent of CFJ 1771. >> >> Appeals are support (not consent) now, so you probably need to do that >> to a public forum. Nevertheless, I support that intent. > > The quoted intent was sent to a public forum. > Hm. Indeed it was. Apparently, I'm bad a reading...
