DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: 2009/9/16 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com: coppro wrote: I assign myself as judge to CFJ 2679, and I judge it FALSE. I intend, with 2 support, to appeal. The arguments indicate that the transfer failed, but the statement is ais523 owns a Dunce Cap card which should have been judged TRUE. I recommend REASSIGN, as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as ais523 transferred a Dunce Cap card or something similar. I support. I support and do so. Good arguments, but they don't match the judgement. (Recommend REASSIGN to coppro so e can fix them.) -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes
Wait, what? Why not REMAND? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:26 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: 2009/9/16 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com: coppro wrote: I assign myself as judge to CFJ 2679, and I judge it FALSE. I intend, with 2 support, to appeal. The arguments indicate that the transfer failed, but the statement is ais523 owns a Dunce Cap card which should have been judged TRUE. I recommend REASSIGN, as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as ais523 transferred a Dunce Cap card or something similar. I support. I support and do so. Good arguments, but they don't match the judgement. (Recommend REASSIGN to coppro so e can fix them.) -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:30 -0400, comex wrote: Wait, what? Why not REMAND? Because the case was originally assigned to Pavitra by mistake. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes
ais523 wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:30 -0400, comex wrote: Wait, what? Why not REMAND? Because the case was originally assigned to Pavitra by mistake. I was the judge at the time of the assignment; I don't believe I would not therefore be the prior judge. -coppro
DIS: Re: BUS: Sorry, mis-read my notes
I wrote: I intend, with 2 support, to appeal. The arguments indicate that the transfer failed, but the statement is ais523 owns a Dunce Cap card which should have been judged TRUE. I recommend REASSIGN, as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as ais523 transferred a Dunce Cap card or something similar. I meant to recommend REMAND.
