DIS: Re: OFF: IADoP - Letting you know Who's Who in Agora
quazie wrote: his is a mostly complete report from the IADoP. Because we have more than enough CFJs as it is, you should probably state explicitly that you're publishing the report on behalf of IADoP Human Point Two. While I'm at it, I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement has not changed since its registration, thus HP2's existence as a registered player is not contingent on the outcome of CFJ 1668.
BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: IADoP - Letting you know Who's Who in Agora
Zefram wrote: > Yeah, since we don't have the concept of perjury any more (and actually > it was never applicable in this type of situation) these statements > don't carry the weight that is intended. I think it's unfortunate that > misrepresentation, which had more general utility, has also been repealed. The wholesale removal of specific penalties and crimes as part of the great repeals was meant to anticipate judicial reforms (which would at least spell out rules of subpoena, requests for evidence, and perjury. -Goethe
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: IADoP - Letting you know Who's Who in Agora
comex wrote: >I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement >*has* changed since its registration. Yeah, since we don't have the concept of perjury any more (and actually it was never applicable in this type of situation) these statements don't carry the weight that is intended. I think it's unfortunate that misrepresentation, which had more general utility, has also been repealed. -zefram
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: IADoP - Letting you know Who's Who in Agora
comex wrote: On Thursday 17 May 2007 11:41 pm, Ed Murphy wrote: While I'm at it, I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement has not changed since its registration, thus HP2's existence as a registered player is not contingent on the outcome of CFJ 1668. I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement *has* changed since its registration. Well, it's a good thing for one of us that perjury is no longer defined by the rules, isn't it? :) Someone could probably get a decent thesis out of analyzing the potential legal and social consequences of willful lies (largely dependent on whether other players have reasonable cause to suspect them as being lies).
