[algogeeks] Re: program for evaluation of remainders

2010-12-11 Thread Dave
Are all of you talking about getting the result in closed form, so
that no loop is involved?

Other than mine, I haven't seen an implementation of a working
algorithm. Let's see your code!

My algorithm avoids calculating the factorials, which overflow 32-bit
integers for N > 12, and is O(min(N,n)). When you beat that, let me
know.

Dave

On Dec 11, 10:15 am, "Shiv Shankar"  wrote:
> Hi,
>   I agree with ankit sablok. And if we get the factorial of n in 1!, 2!, 3!
> Etc. Then we can find the number easily. In its complexity will be O(N)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: algogeeks@googlegroups.com [mailto:algoge...@googlegroups.com] On
>
> Behalf Of Dave
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 8:10 PM
> To: Algorithm Geeks
> Subject: [algogeeks] Re: program for evaluation of remainders
>
> @Ankit: Why not just use the algorithm I proposed 
> inhttp://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/msg/2941ab071a39517c:
>
> x = 0;
> for( i = (n < N ? n : N) ; i > 0 ; --i )
>     x = (i * x + i) % n;
>
> Dave
>
> On Dec 10, 4:23 am, ankit sablok  wrote:
> > @Dave
> > we will use residues then i think the property of modulus
>
> > 1!mod997 + 2!mod997 + 3!mod997 .. + 997!mod997
>
> > i just proposed the solution using congruences for the case
> > n
> > can u generalize the problem using congruences if so then please post
> > it
> > thnanx in advance
>
> > On Dec 9, 2:13 am, Dave  wrote:
>
> > > @Ankit: So how does that work with, e.g., N = n = 997? I.e., what is
> > > the calculation?
>
> > > Dave
>
> > > On Dec 8, 11:33 am, ankit sablok  wrote:
>
> > > > @ all the authors thanx for the suggestions actually wt i know about
> > > > the problem is i think we can solve the problem mathematically if we
> > > > know about congruences
>
> > > > for instance
> > > > if N=100
> > > > 1! + 2! + . + 100!
> > > > and n=12
>
> > > > we find that
> > > > 4!mod24=0
>
> > > > hence the above equation reduces to the
> > > > (1!+2!+3!)mod 12 =9
> > > > hence the answer is 9
>
> > > > so can anyone write a program for this logic
>
> > > > On Dec 8, 6:19 pm, ankit sablok  wrote:
>
> > > > > Q) can anyboy find me the solution to this problem
>
> > > > > Given an integer N and an another integer n we have to write a
> program
> > > > > to find the remainder of the following problems
> > > > > (1! + 2! + 3! + 4! + . + N!)mod(n)
>
> > > > > N<=100
> > > > > n<=1000;
>
> > > > > please help me write a program for this problem
> > > > > thanx in advance- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



RE: [algogeeks] Re: program for evaluation of remainders

2010-12-11 Thread Shiv Shankar
Hi,
  I agree with ankit sablok. And if we get the factorial of n in 1!, 2!, 3!
Etc. Then we can find the number easily. In its complexity will be O(N)
  


-Original Message-
From: algogeeks@googlegroups.com [mailto:algoge...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 8:10 PM
To: Algorithm Geeks
Subject: [algogeeks] Re: program for evaluation of remainders

@Ankit: Why not just use the algorithm I proposed in
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/msg/2941ab071a39517c:

x = 0;
for( i = (n < N ? n : N) ; i > 0 ; --i )
x = (i * x + i) % n;

Dave

On Dec 10, 4:23 am, ankit sablok  wrote:
> @Dave
> we will use residues then i think the property of modulus
>
> 1!mod997 + 2!mod997 + 3!mod997 .. + 997!mod997
>
> i just proposed the solution using congruences for the case
> n
> can u generalize the problem using congruences if so then please post
> it
> thnanx in advance
>
> On Dec 9, 2:13 am, Dave  wrote:
>
>
>
> > @Ankit: So how does that work with, e.g., N = n = 997? I.e., what is
> > the calculation?
>
> > Dave
>
> > On Dec 8, 11:33 am, ankit sablok  wrote:
>
> > > @ all the authors thanx for the suggestions actually wt i know about
> > > the problem is i think we can solve the problem mathematically if we
> > > know about congruences
>
> > > for instance
> > > if N=100
> > > 1! + 2! + . + 100!
> > > and n=12
>
> > > we find that
> > > 4!mod24=0
>
> > > hence the above equation reduces to the
> > > (1!+2!+3!)mod 12 =9
> > > hence the answer is 9
>
> > > so can anyone write a program for this logic
>
> > > On Dec 8, 6:19 pm, ankit sablok  wrote:
>
> > > > Q) can anyboy find me the solution to this problem
>
> > > > Given an integer N and an another integer n we have to write a
program
> > > > to find the remainder of the following problems
> > > > (1! + 2! + 3! + 4! + . + N!)mod(n)
>
> > > > N<=100
> > > > n<=1000;
>
> > > > please help me write a program for this problem
> > > > thanx in advance- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



[algogeeks] Re: find the number.

2010-12-11 Thread Dave
@Naresh: The sequence of numbers generated by this rule for any given
starting number is called a Collatz Sequence. Try googling it.

Here is a list of the number of iterations required for n between 1
and 10,000: http://oeis.org/A006577/b006577.txt. Maybe that will help.

Dave

On Dec 11, 7:20 am, Naresh A  wrote:
> Given range of numbers between A and B (A<= B)
> Find the number within given range which has more number of iterations as
> per the following
>
>      n { stop ; return iteration number }  if n=1;
>      n = 3n+1                              if n is odd
>      n =  n/2                              if n is even
>
> for eg :
>
> n=3 odd
> 
> n=10;
> n=5;
> n=16;
> n=8;
> n=4;
> n=2;
> n=1;
>
> iterations : 7
>
> --
> *
> Time complexity= (
> *
> *NARESH ,A*
> **

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



[algogeeks] find the number.

2010-12-11 Thread Naresh A
Given range of numbers between A and B (A<= B)
Find the number within given range which has more number of iterations as
per the following

 n { stop ; return iteration number }  if n=1;
 n = 3n+1  if n is odd
 n =  n/2  if n is even

for eg :

n=3 odd

n=10;
n=5;
n=16;
n=8;
n=4;
n=2;
n=1;

iterations : 7

-- 
*
Time complexity= (http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks] Longest interval with maximum sum

2010-12-11 Thread ADITYA KUMAR
@amir can u explain a bit more...
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Amir hossein Shahriari <
amir.hossein.shahri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @jai : since sum of all values in C is between -n and n the last step can
> be done in O(n) time and O(n) space
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:44 PM, jai gupta wrote:
>
>> @fenghuang: the last step will take O(n logn ) . Or there is some better
>> way?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>



-- 
Regards
Aditya Kumar
B-tech 3rd year
Computer Science & Engg.
MNNIT, Allahabad.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



Re: [algogeeks]

2010-12-11 Thread Abhishek Goswami
Is it any puzzle

On 11 Dec 2010 16:07, "parth panchal"  wrote:

how are you

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



[algogeeks]

2010-12-11 Thread parth panchal
how are you

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.