[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User kso changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 10 12:35:33 + 2011 --- Closing. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User kso changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 10 12:35:07 + 2011 --- As the original report is about problems with dictionaries and this is solved now, I consider this issue resolved. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from i...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 9 17:06:40 + 2011 --- kso: Yes, for extensions we nowadays have this layering. So for dictionaries this problem should no longer occur. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User kso changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'colebantam,is,syzygy,volk|'colebantam,syzygy,volkerm |erme' |e' Issue type|TASK |DEFECT Priority|P3|P4 --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 9 16:31:02 + 2011 --- is: Isn't it so that nowadays (OOo 3.3) the abovementioned 3rd -- the shared -- layer is already available? - settings deployed with bundled extensions define "system" settings - settings deployed with shared extensions define settings, which overrule systems settings for all users - without physically(!) overwriting the system settings - settings deployed with user extensions overrule bundled and shared settings Thus the solution for the problems mentioned above is not to overwrite settings files in the office installation directory tree, but to deploy the settings in question as shared extensions. Especially the problem with the dictionaries no longer should exist, as dictionaries are extensions today. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User syzygy changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'colebantam,is,volkerme' |'colebantam,is,syzygy,volk | |erme' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User is changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 3.1 |OOo Later --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 12:13:07 + 2008 --- New target again. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User kso changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 3.0 |OOo 3.1 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 30 12:07:12 + 2008 --- as Ingo wished... => 3.1 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User is changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 2.x |OOo 3.0 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 14:13:54 + 2007 --- Target OOo 3.0 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User is changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |STARTED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 03:24:59 -0700 2006 --- Accepted - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User is changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 3.0 |OOo 2.x --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 27 03:22:50 -0700 2006 --- Setting new target - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 03:32:21 -0800 2006 --- DicBack.cmd: To correct an possible misunderstanding. DicBack.cmd was not intended as a " solution" to the problem, but as a quick'n dirty workaround. I wrote it for my friends and customers to simplify the update from 2.0 to 2.0.1, and decided afterwards that it might be useful for others to, and that for attached it to this thread. Shared Layer: This proposal of "is" is what I mentioned in the previous thread. I wrote that there should be a OO Folder in "All Users\Application Data" which contains the shared data. Of course "is" wrote it more detailed and from a more "inside" technical view ;-) I hope this new layer can be introduced without many other changes. Nevertheless, if OOo gets a new "layer", a "converter" would be fine... Target: I fear that targeting this issue to Version 3 is far to late! I think a 2.1 Version Target would be much better. Also, I think that a solution for the 2.0. x Series should be introduced. Of course it makes no sense to implement a merge system for every file that could be changed by users (as "is" said), but an simple switch (Don't update my Dictionarys) in the installer would solve the problem at first. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 24 03:22:45 -0800 2006 --- I think it would be fine to have an automatic update mechanism of files changed by the user. But I also think, that we will not be able to offer this. We need a merge/update mechanism for all files that could be changed by the user. And we need this for all platforms. The attached batch file is a solution only for dictinary.lst and only for Windows. Obviously xml files need a completely different merge mechanism. And who knows? Tomorrow a new file is introduced, that can be changed after the installation. Then again a new merge mechnism for all platforms has to be implemented. This results in the problem that new files are introduced by someone, without taking care of the update problem. Many months later, when the first update is available, we recognize the problem and have to implement update/merge processes for this file for all platforms. And sometimes it can also be possible, that no update or merge is possible, for example for customized pictures. No, I think this process will not work. The only solution seems to be a new layer, which can be used to overwrite the global settings made by the installation. But it cannot be allowed to change the global settings made by the installation. So we have a user layer, that contains the user specific settings. Then we need a new customization layer for settings for all users. And then we have the global settings, that are available after the installation. And this settings must not be changed, because all settings are lost after update. This seems to be a feasible scenario. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment | |(id=32518) Batch File for | |saveing dic files --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:45:02 -0800 2005 --- Created an attachment (id=32518) Batch File for saveing dic files - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:43:30 -0800 2005 --- I wrote a small batchfile which reads the installation folder from the registry, and prompts the user afterwards if he wants to backup or restore the dic files. It is written for german speacking users, but maybe someone wants to translate it into english ;-) It may be usefull, as long as the update don't keep the installed dic's, which I fear will be the case for 2.0.1 at least... Try to create a attachment... I tested it only on XP, but should work on W2K to. Donst know for 9x... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 10:53:27 -0800 2005 --- Danke Andre, warst schon wieder schneller ;-) Soll ich das mit dem "All USers/Anwendungsdaten" Ordner hier nochmal schreiben, oder reicht der Verweis auf dem alten Thread? MfG, Claus *VOTE* - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User andreschnabel changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'colebantam,volkerme' Keywords| |regression --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 02:03:33 -0800 2005 --- setting regression keyword, as we were able to transfer those configuration data wihtin 1.1.x codeline - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]