[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Satellite Communications Achievement Award #500

2009-05-20 Thread Kent Frazier
I have to agree with Tim on this.

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:03,  wrote:

> Hey Bruce (and all),
>
> I would prefer that AMSAT issue awards numbered to represent the order in
> which they were received.
>
> I believe doing otherwise to be inappropriate because it does not
> accurately reflect the true history of the award.
>
> Is anyone aware of a precedent like this involving another award - that is,
> that No. XXX of an award may actually not represent the XXXth application
> received? Something about that just doesn't seem right to me.
>
> I know that if I was submitting the 500th application - and, of course,
> only the awards administrator would know whether I actually WAS - I would be
> upset to learn that I would not be getting that 500th award - especially if
> someone who applied after me was awarded it.
>
> One final queston - has the AMSAT Board blessed this? I'll definitely stand
> corrected if appropriate, but it occurs to me that any action that would
> alter in any way the official statistical record of an award should at least
> have board review, if not formal action of approval.
>
> My apologies to anyone who's offended by my stated preference to maintain
> an accurate historical record.
>
> 73 to all,
>
> Tim - N3TL
> -- Original message from Bruce :
> --
>
>
> > I am ready to issue AMSAT Satellite Communications Achievement Award
> > number 490 today. What I am going to do so that a group of people have
> > the opportunity of receiving number 500 is this
> >
> > The next 20 that submit for this award (including the one I just
> > received) will be stacked in the order that they were submitted. After
> > all 20 are here (numbers 490-509) I will have Mahana, W5BTS, select one
> > of the call signs out of a hat. That person will receive certificate
> > number 500. Everyone else will then get their certificate in the order
> > they submitted. (H... Mahana never submitted for this award, could
> > she pull her own call?)
> >
> > The lucky operator could be you. But only if you submit an application
> > for the AMSAT Satellite Communications Achievement Award. This award is
> > available to hams worldwide. You do not need to be a member of AMSAT.
> > Rules for the award can be found at the AMSAT http://www.amsat.org
> > Click on Contests and Awards in the left margin.
> >
> > Scanned QSL cards emailed to me is the best way to submit for the award.
> > JPG files are preferred. PDF and DOC files are fine just larger in size.
> >
> > This might take a month or two depending on how quickly the submissions
> > arrive so be patient as your certificate will not mail until the last
> > one is received. I will let you know via email that I have received your
> > submission. I will let everyone know when the 20 entries have been
> > received and you will have no more than 3 days from then to make payment
> > for the award at the AMSAT online store (payment may be made earlier if
> > you desire). Lucky number 500 will be issued and all certificates will
> > go in the mail.
> >
> > 73...bruce
> > AMSAT Director Contest and Awards
> >
> > --
> >
> > Bruce Paige, KK5DO
> >
> > AMSAT Director Contests and Awards
> >
> > ARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE
> >
> > Houston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on SkyScanner Satellite Radio Network on
> Galaxy-25
> > @97° West,
> > Transponder 23 (12115 Vert), Symbol Rate: 22425, APID: 1794 (DVB Free To
> Air)
> > Also streaming MP3 athttp://www.amsatnet.com
> > Podcast athttp://www.amsatnet.com/podcast.xml or iTunes
> >
> > Latest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News
> > http://www.arrl.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> ___
> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>



-- 
Kent K5KNT
AMSAT #36765
ARRL
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Stealth Satellite Station?

2009-10-28 Thread Kent Frazier
I currently live in a rental house and an outside antenna is out of the
question. I asked about putting up a satellite TV dish at my own expense
last year and received and flat out "NO".  So, my current options are as
follows:

1. Going out to my car and working the FM birds with my Icom 2720H and 19"
whip.
2. Working the FM birds from the back/front yard or possibly inside the
house with my Icom W32A and Elk LP antenna.
3. Setting up my 2720 in the house with some sort of stealth antenna and
give a try at satellite APRS.

Obviously options 1 and 3 still allow for option 2.

Has anyone tried any form of stealth antenna for Satellites. I am really
interested in the idea of combining the satellites and aprs together.

-- 
Kent R Frazier, K5KNT
AMSAT #36765, ARRL, San Angelo Amateur Radio Club, Tom Green County - ARES

Sent from San Angelo, TX, United States
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO51 pass this evening 0039UT

2010-11-09 Thread Kent Frazier
Would this apply to using a digital voice recorder also, in your opinion?

I operate handheld (using an Icom w32a and an Elk antenna) I'm unable to
write down ANY information during a contact.
I'd hate to think I'm somehow disqualified from an award because I listened
to my recordings to log my contacts after the pass is over.

The OP only missed the call by one character, and they sound similar. I'm
not sure what equipment both parties were using, but I remember having a
very hard time making out calls with my gear. Especially on AO-51 pileups.
One of the reasons I quit for awhile is I got tired of competing with the
"big guns".

I've been off the air for about a year now. I'm looking forward to getting
back on the birds.

Kent, K5KNT

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 07:45, Andrew Glasbrenner  wrote:

>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: n...@lavabit.com
> >Sent: Nov 9, 2010 8:32 AM
> >To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> >Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO51 pass this evening 0039UT
> >
> >I may be hated for this but I have to ask, if you make a contact and you
> >get the call wrong so you would not get a QSL card because you can't mail
> >the right person is it really fair to use another medium to search out the
> >correct call in order to secure the contact for award reasons?  I always
> >thought the QSO had to be a successful exchange of at least the call signs
> >over the air to count as a contact.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> >Jerry
> >N0JY
> >
>
> In my opinion you are 100% correct. Make a second contact to make it legit.
> If you just want to find the right call for your own reasons or to arrange
> another contact, cool. If you want to use the busted QSO for an award, not
> cool.
>
> 73, Drew KO4MA
>
>
> ___
> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Working the Transponder Sats

2010-11-10 Thread Kent Frazier
It has been suggested to me that I try the transponder sats.  My question is
what type of equipment would I need for this. I'm currently unable to run
any type of mast mounted antenna(s) and would prefer it be portable or
mobile if possible.

My current setup is an Icom W32-A handheld with an Elk antenna.  Am I
correct in my belief that I can't work the transponder sats with an FM
radio?

Thanks

-- 
Kent, K5KNT
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb