Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Trevor Woerner
On 10/03/14 05:33, Koen Kooi wrote:
> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)

In keeping with the measurement theme (as Khem has already pointed out)
I like this one better too (fwiw).

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 4 okt. 2014, om 10:00 heeft Khem Raj  het volgende 
geschreven:

> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Koen Kooi  wrote:
>> The current config has too many DISTRO_FEATURES, the biggest one being 
>> 'x11'. I'd love to keep systemd as init, but we might need something smaller 
>> as well.
> 
> how about uselessd :)
> http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/

I've looked at it, but udev rules and journal are very good to have and 
uselessd kicked those to the curb :(
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Koen Kooi  wrote:
> The current config has too many DISTRO_FEATURES, the biggest one being 'x11'. 
> I'd love to keep systemd as init, but we might need something smaller as well.

how about uselessd :)
http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-04 Thread Koen Kooi

Op 3 okt. 2014, om 18:27 heeft Philip Balister  het 
volgende geschreven:

> On 10/03/2014 02:33 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I 
>> want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom 
>> config just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those 
>> systems and is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm 
>> struggling with is coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it 
>> with a few people in person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the 
>> following 2 options remain:
>> 
>> 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT)
>> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)
>> 
>> What are your thoughts on all this?
> 
> Why doesn't the current config work?

The current config has too many DISTRO_FEATURES, the biggest one being 'x11'. 
I'd love to keep systemd as init, but we might need something smaller as well.

regards,

Koen

> 
> Philip
> 
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Koen
>> ___
>> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
>> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
>> 
>> 
> 
> ___
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
> 


___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Friday, October 3, 2014, Koen Kooi  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few
> I want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom
> config just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those
> systems and is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm
> struggling with is coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it
> with a few people in person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the
> following 2 options remain:
>
> 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT)
> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)


Iota is what I like. Its in same line as measurement unit. I view it as iot
answer is angstrom

>
> What are your thoughts on all this?
>
> thanks,
>
> Koen
> ___
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org 
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
>
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-03 Thread Philip Balister
On 10/03/2014 02:33 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I 
> want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config 
> just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and 
> is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm struggling with is 
> coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it with a few people in 
> person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the following 2 options remain:
> 
> 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT)
> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)
> 
> What are your thoughts on all this?

Why doesn't the current config work?

Philip

> 
> thanks,
> 
> Koen
> ___
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
> 
> 

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


Re: [Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-03 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:33:04AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I 
> want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config 
> just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and 
> is binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm struggling with is 
> coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it with a few people in 
> person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the following 2 options remain:
> 
> 1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT)

This is the winner, anything that puts the Angstrom bit last is a loser!

Graeme


> 2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)
> 
> What are your thoughts on all this?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Koen
> ___
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel

___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel


[Angstrom-devel] Naming of the Angstrom derivative for resource limited systems

2014-10-03 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi,

I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I 
want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config 
just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and is 
binary incompatible with the regular angstrom. What I'm struggling with is 
coming up with a catchy name for it. After discussing it with a few people in 
person at Linaro Connect and virtually on IRC the following 2 options remain:

1) The Angstrom of Things (AoT)
2) Internet of Things - Angstrom (iota)

What are your thoughts on all this?

thanks,

Koen
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel