Re: [arr] Voiceless BGMs - Explained!

2008-02-29 Thread Kiran Maringanti
Team,

Every Rahman album has atleast one mesmerizing BGM. we cannot absolutely skip 
any of them. My suggestions is we go chrnologically starting from his first 
release and work our way up. 

We must try to extract every bgm from every of ARR. 

Regards

Kiran




- Original Message 
From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 8:51:00 AM
Subject: Re: [arr] Voiceless BGMs - Explained!

Hi Krishna 
 
With God's Grace, I have been able to provide BGMs of these movies. ( Almost 
voiceless )
 
1. 1947 Earth 
2. Rangeela 
3. gentleman
4. NEW
5. Tehzeeb 
6. Pudiya Mugam 
7. Taal 
8. Godfather 
9. Meenaxi 
 
 
There are many more BGMs which are following.  Pls update them 
 


 
On 2/29/08, KrishnA <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: 
Hi all
 
As kaissiom said, first we have to make a list of movies which need to be 
ripped (for the purpose of BGMs), so in this regard, I have made a list, but I 
am very skeptical about the legitimacy of that, so all guys are requested to 
update it for further purpose.
 
Thanks
Krishna.

 
On 2/19/08, kaissiom <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: 
Voiceless BGMs - Explained!

I'm not much of any expert on this topic, as I happened to accidentally or 
unintentionally discover the process of ripping voiceless BGMs.  There may be 
members on this group who have expertise in this area who may be able to shed 
some more light on this topic.  Following article is my limited understanding 
of this subject, please correct me if I am wrong.

First, some definitions:
* For the sake of discussion L refers to Left and R refers to Right (speakers)

Mono: Single channel (no difference in L or R speaker, both reproduce one sound)
L speaker = R speaker = One sound from both.
[Note]: Rahman has been very disappointed that 'Kabhi Na Kabhi' was recorded in 
stereo, but released in Mono.

Stereo: Two or more channels (generally two channel, separate 
recording/reproduct ion of sound, L and R)
L speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
+ R speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
= 3 different sounds possible: L sound + Shared L/R sound + R sound
[Note]: Think of it as a Venn diagram: Both L and R speakers reproduce same 
sound most of the time, but will also have variations of their own.  Quite 
evident in 'Daud' - Title track, the entire track has variations in Left and 
Right channel.

Stereo Surround: 5.1 or higher (5 channels plus 1 LFE; Dolby-Digital, dts)
L Front speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
+R Front speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
+C Center speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
+L Rear speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
+R Rear speaker: recorded/reproduced separately
+LFE Low-Frequency Effects(sub- woofer)
= Surround Sound experience.
[Note]: Most, but not all, DVD-Videos have 5.1 surround sound.  And also the 
rare, but dying, DVD-Audio format falls in this category.

There's no limitation on the number of channels, I find some English movies 
with 7.1 surround sound , you can also buy a 10.1 sound systems, if you can 
find source to utilize those channels.

Almost all Media formats can reproduce mono and stereo, but not surround:
Cassette tapes: Stereo and Mono
CD: Stereo and Mono
VCD: Stereo and Mono
DVD: Surround, Stereo and Mono

How does this relate to voiceless BGMs?
Voiceless BGMs are only possible from surround sound, given that they were 
recorded and reproduce as surround.  So, that leaves us with DVD-Audio, which I 
won't get into, and DVD-Video, by which we mean regular DVD movies.

How are BGMs recorded on DVDs?
I don't know exactly, but that's up to the composer and the sound engineer.  
But in order to qualify as surround sound, they have to record different sounds 
for different channels. For example they may record actors' voices for the 
CENTER channel and the background score for the two-REAR speakers and a 
combination of both voices and score on the two-FRONT speakers  (this is 
hypothetical, simple and straightforward example):
L/R Front speakers: Combination/ layers of both voices and background score
CENTER speaker: Only voices
L/R Rear speakers: Only background score

You can imagine watching a movie and an extra sound effect from back, or 
someone yelling from behind you or a car whooshing by.  And remember, they can 
try many different combinations with 5 different channels.

How to extract voiceless BGMs?
Simply put, you have to tap into the  channels that only contain the 
'Background Score'.   In the simple example given above, it would be the 'L/R 
Rear Speaker/Channel'.

How do kaissiom and AJ extract voiceless BGMs?
Well, I can't speak for AJ, but I know he uses some software.  And as far as 
I'm concerned, I can write a longer post than this one trying to explain how I 
accidentally did it.  My method is not all software- it's combination of 
hardware and software.   I was fixing my computer and my home-theater system 
set-up, such that I can play the music from my computer on my sur

[arr] 2 tickets available for chicago show

2007-05-30 Thread Kiran Maringanti
Hello Everyone,

I have 2 tickets for the chicago show. the ticket price is $ 70 each. Due to 
some unforeseen circumstances, I am unable to attend the concert. If anyone is 
interested in buying them, please do let me know. 

Regards

Kiran
 
Dr. Kiran Maringanti MS(Comp), PhD(e-Business)

[arr] A.R.Rahman show + Chicago

2007-05-23 Thread Kiran Maringanti
Guys,

I accidentally purchased 2 tickets for A.R.Rahman show in Chicago, whilst i was 
supposed to buy it for the Atlanta show. I spoke to the organizers and they 
said it cannot be refunded or shifted to the atlanta show. The tickets are $70 
tickets. 

If anyone is purchasing tickets for Chicago show, can you take these tickets 
and buy tickets for the atlanta show OR if anyone is interested in taking these 
tickets for the chicago show, please do let me know.

Guys, I am just like u, not any ticket broker or something. I am not trying to 
make money or something. I am just trying to fix a mistake. 

Regards

Kiran

Re: [arr] Re: Greetings from Sathya

2007-05-17 Thread Kiran Maringanti
I totally agree with you guys. This forum is about ARR and should remain that 
way. Though i appreciate satya, I agree with the notion that this is not a 
proper forum to project any other individual other than ARR.

We do not intend to hurt anyone, however we a strong group of >10k, it is 
pretty important to maintain the context of our work around ARR and his work 
and anything else is beyond the scope of this forum.

We can gladly start another forum which will be a ground for upcoming artists 
and showcase their work. 

Regards

Kiran
 
Dr. Kiran Maringanti MS(Comp), PhD(e-Business)

 

 



- Original Message 
From: || V i s h w e s h || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:55:31 PM
Subject: Re: [arr] Re: Greetings from Sathya

I agree.

Shah Navas G  wrote: 
Hi Sathya,

I do appreciate and listen to your musical compositions.

But this forum, is for A R Rahman. As long as you have ARR compositions
to share, its fine for me.

But I sense that your messages are trying more to promote yourself.
(This is purely a personal view).

I know its really tough to draw a line between Fan's enthusiasm and self
promotion.

So I ask Gopal and others - should we allow musicians to promote
themselves on this forum?
(After all music is what we are here for, and ARR himself wants to
promote budding and new talents)

On an opposing note - won't letting non-ARR related stuff and music to
be promoted dilute the forum in the long run?

Just my thoughts and no offense meant to anybody.
And I stand with the view that this forum should be ARR and ARR only, as
with the convergence of technologies, and umpteen number of talent hunts
and shows, artists have so many other channels to promote themselves.

Navas
.




" The search is more important than the destination "
- a r rahman -


Building a website is a piece of cake. 
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.