Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails
Hi, https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz If I look at this file I agree with you that there is no In-Replay-To. But the email header is normaly much longer. So we can see this if you create a new message for the list (not a reply). The mailing list modifies the emails and removes a lot of header entries. Perhaps the mailing list has a problem with multi-part email. Have you tried to send new emails without attachments/pgp? If it is working than the mailing ist has a problem with that and attachments should be avoided. see: Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/attachments/20080912/69d789a8/attachment.pgp From sven.eckelmann at gmx.de Fri Sep 12 16:59:45 2008 /Stephan --- Dipl.Informatiker(FH) Stephan Enderlein Freifunk Dresden
Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails
On Friday 26 September 2008 14:56:17 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) wrote: https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz If I look at this file I agree with you that there is no In-Replay-To. But the email header is normaly much longer. So we can see this if you create a new message for the list (not a reply). The mailing list modifies the emails and removes a lot of header entries. I know, but this should be the important fields for mailman hyper-archiver. Perhaps the mailing list has a problem with multi-part email. Have you tried to send new emails without attachments/pgp? If it is working than the mailing ist has a problem with that and attachments should be avoided. I never send these patches as multipart mails with pgp stuff - just simple text/plain mails Best regards, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
