named error messages

2009-10-15 Thread Toto 
Hi,

we're getting quite a lot of messages like the ones below recently. The server 
is a resolver running bind 9.6.1-P1 (compiled from source on debian etch).

16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.430 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset
16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.486 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset
16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.543 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset
16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.575 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset
16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.634 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset
16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.667 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset
16-Oct-2009 08:28:50.703 dispatch: dispatch 0xeed08400: shutting down due to 
TCP receive error: [IP REMOVED]#53: connection reset


Searching for clues I stumbled across an old problem from 2006 
(https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2006-August/063501.html).
Anyone else with these kind of messages in their logfiles lately?


Ciao
Torsten
-- 
Toto 
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Doug Barton 
Kevin Darcy wrote:
> John Horne wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
>>  
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
>>>
 How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
   
>>> I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
>>> far more better tool for getting such information:
>>>
>>> 
>> I agree, it's not for me though :-)
>>
>> I have to teach some Windows people about the DNS, and wanted to show
>> them that they could use 'nslookup' on either the Linux box provided, or
>> their own Windows PC's. In this instance the TTL is important. So I was
>> hoping that the MS and BIND nslookup commands would display something
>> pretty much similar to each other so as not to confuse the people too
>> much.
>>
>> As far as I can tell no BIND 9 nslookup command shows the TTL. I am
>> currently looking at an 8.2.3 version to see if I can patch the 9.5.1
>> one to display TTL's again. It may, however, be better to introduce them
>> to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.
>>   
> Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and
> BURYING it. Forever.
> 
> If I had a nickel for every time someone mis-read the output of nslookup
> and mistook the nameserver's name, for the name of the server they're
> actually looking up, well, let's just say I probably wouldn't be posting
> to bind-users from my work account...
> 
> (Fortunately nslookup's whole "won't do a lookup because I can't
> reverse-resolve my resolver" bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler,
> since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but that's another popular
> "nslookup sucks, don't use it"-category posting to this mailing list)

http://dougbarton.us/DNS/bind-users-FAQ.html#nslookup-evil

-- 

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Mark Andrews 

In message <76d7097b-28a4-4bbb-a2c8-05bf5b822...@conundrum.com>, Matthew Pounse
tt writes:
> 
> On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> >>>
> >> Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING  
> >> and
> >> BURYING it. Forever.
> >>
> > So why does the ISC still distribute it?
> > (Although I guess the answer may simply be "because people still use
> > it".)
> 
> There was a while there that nslookup printed a big warning banner  
> telling you not to use it because it'd been deprecated and would go  
> away any day now.   That doesn't seem to be there anymore, sadly.   I  
> kinda wish it would just vanish.

We lost the battle to get rid of nslookup.

Index: bin/dig/nslookup.c
===
RCS file: /proj/cvs/prod/bind9/bin/dig/nslookup.c,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -r1.122 nslookup.c
--- bin/dig/nslookup.c  6 May 2009 23:47:50 -   1.122
+++ bin/dig/nslookup.c  15 Oct 2009 12:45:26 -
@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@
printrdata(&rdata);
}
dns_rdata_reset(&rdata);
+   printf("\tttl = %u\n", rdataset->ttl);
loopresult = dns_rdataset_next(rdataset);
}
}
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: adding new RR?

2009-10-15 Thread Mark Andrews 

In message <20091015135428.ga19...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 15.10.09 21:29, aihua zhang wrote:
> > recently,i want to modify source code of BIND9.6.1 to adding new RR.
> 
> Don't do that. You bind will be incompatible with any other DNS server and
> it could lead to

As long as the type is registered it doesn't matter. 

> > Now,i just begin to check  RR to see how it work,but i find this method
> > exhausting me.i don't think this way is effective,so i'm very appreciate
> > some one  could give me a guid, or some example:souce code is perfect

You have lots of examples. see lib/dns/rdata/*/*.[ch]  This is where the
rdata are defined.   Just run "make clean" then "make" once you have
created the new files so that the build process can find them.
 
> Better try to explain what do you want to achieve
> -- 
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> 42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot. 
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Matthew Pounsett 


On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote:


On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:


Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING  
and

BURYING it. Forever.


So why does the ISC still distribute it?
(Although I guess the answer may simply be "because people still use
it".)


There was a while there that nslookup printed a big warning banner  
telling you not to use it because it'd been deprecated and would go  
away any day now.   That doesn't seem to be there anymore, sadly.   I  
kinda wish it would just vanish.




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread John Horne 
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> >   
> Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and 
> BURYING it. Forever.
> 
So why does the ISC still distribute it?
(Although I guess the answer may simply be "because people still use
it".)

Don't get me wrong here - I've been using dig for years, and only use
nslookup if I have to on my Windows laptop at work, on the Linux/UNIX
systems dig is only used. If nslookup was no longer present in the BIND
distribution then that doesn't bother me at all.




John.

-- 
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com 
You can do an "ipconfig /displaydns" to see some TTL info.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John Horne
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:07 AM
To: Bind users
Subject: Nslookup not showng TTL

Hello,

Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the
TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or
'd2'. Example:

==
nslookup
> set debug
> www.plymouth.ac.uk
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53


QUESTIONS:
www.plymouth.ac.uk, type = A, class = IN
ANSWERS:
->  www.plymouth.ac.uk
canonical name = extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
->  extranet.plymouth.ac.uk
internet address = 141.163.163.185
AUTHORITY RECORDS:
->  plymouth.ac.uk
nameserver = dns0.plymouth.ac.uk.
->  plymouth.ac.uk
nameserver = dns1.plymouth.ac.uk.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
->  dns0.plymouth.ac.uk
internet address = 141.163.1.250
->  dns1.plymouth.ac.uk
internet address = 141.163.177.1

www.plymouth.ac.uk  canonical name = extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
Name:   extranet.plymouth.ac.uk
Address: 141.163.163.185
>
==


How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?



Thanks,

John.

-- 
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Sam Wilson 
In article ,
 Kevin Darcy  wrote:

> (Fortunately nslookup's whole "won't do a lookup because I can't 
> reverse-resolve my resolver" bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler, 
> since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but that's another popular 
> "nslookup sucks, don't use it"-category posting to this mailing list)

Fortunately (or not - it would be another nail) that bogosity is gone 
from recent nslookups.

Sam
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Kevin Darcy 

John Horne wrote:

On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
  

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:


How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
  

I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
far more better tool for getting such information:



I agree, it's not for me though :-)

I have to teach some Windows people about the DNS, and wanted to show
them that they could use 'nslookup' on either the Linux box provided, or
their own Windows PC's. In this instance the TTL is important. So I was
hoping that the MS and BIND nslookup commands would display something
pretty much similar to each other so as not to confuse the people too
much.

As far as I can tell no BIND 9 nslookup command shows the TTL. I am
currently looking at an 8.2.3 version to see if I can patch the 9.5.1
one to display TTL's again. It may, however, be better to introduce them
to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.
  
Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and 
BURYING it. Forever.


If I had a nickel for every time someone mis-read the output of nslookup 
and mistook the nameserver's name, for the name of the server they're 
actually looking up, well, let's just say I probably wouldn't be posting 
to bind-users from my work account...


(Fortunately nslookup's whole "won't do a lookup because I can't 
reverse-resolve my resolver" bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler, 
since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but that's another popular 
"nslookup sucks, don't use it"-category posting to this mailing list)



  - Kevin



___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

9.7.0a3 PKCS11

2009-10-15 Thread Greg.Rabil 
Hello BIND users,
I am following the steps provided in the README.pkcs11 from the BIND 9.7.0a3 on 
a RHEL5 box.  I seem to be having trouble getting the OpenSSL PKCS11 engine 
patch applied.  I have run:

./Configure linux-generic32 -m32 -pthread \
--pk11-libname=/opt/pkcs11/usr/lib/libpkcs11.so \
--prefix=/opt/pkcs11/usr

Which completes successfully, without errors.  The subsequent 'make' and 'make 
test' also complete successfully.  However, according to the README.pkcs11:

Once you have built OpenSSL, run "apps/openssl engine" to confirm that
PKCS #11 support was compiled in correctly.  The output should include the
line:

(pkcs11) PKCS #11 engine support

If the output is correct, run "make install".

I don't see that line in my output.  Any ideas where to look for my problem?  I 
know that it is not a 32/64 bit mismatch problem, as all my libraries are 
32-bit.  Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Greg

A. Gregory Rabil | Lead Software Architect | BT Diamond IP |
Tel: +1 (610) 423-4770 | Fax: +1 (610) 423-4774 | 
greg.ra...@bt.com |  http://bt.diamondip.com

This electronic message contains information from BT INS, Inc, which may be 
privileged
or confidential.  The information is intended for use only by the individual(s) 
or entity named above.  If you
are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of
this information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this electronic 
message in error, please notify
me by telephone or email (to the number or email address above) immediately.

Activity and use of the BT INS, Inc  e-mail system is monitored to secure its 
effective
operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this 
system will also be monitored
and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business 
purposes.

BT INS Inc, 1600 Memorex Drive, Suite 200, Santa Clara California 95050-2842 
,United States

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: adding new RR?

2009-10-15 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
On 15.10.09 21:29, aihua zhang wrote:
> recently,i want to modify source code of BIND9.6.1 to adding new RR.

Don't do that. You bind will be incompatible with any other DNS server and
it could lead to

> Now,i just begin to check  RR to see how it work,but i find this method
> exhausting me.i don't think this way is effective,so i'm very appreciate
> some one  could give me a guid, or some example:souce code is perfect

Better try to explain what do you want to achieve
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot. 
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

tkey-gssapi-credential and tkey-domain

2009-10-15 Thread Nicholas F Miller 
Can you set more than one Active Directory to use tkey-gssapi- 
credential and tkey-domain in bind?


ie.

Two keytabs:
DNS/foo.example.org at AD1.EXAMPLE.ORG
DNS/foo.example.org at AD2.EXAMPLE.ORG

-- named.conf
-
[...]
options {
[...]
tkey-gssapi-credential "DNS/foo.example.org";
tkey-domain "AD1.EXAMPLE.ORG";
tkey-domain "AD2.EXAMPLE.ORG";
};

_
Nicholas Miller, ITS, University of Colorado at Boulder



___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Sam Wilson 
In article ,
 John Horne  wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
> > > 
> > > How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
> > 
> > I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
> > far more better tool for getting such information:
> > 
> I agree, it's not for me though :-)
> 
> I have to teach some Windows people about the DNS, and wanted to show
> them that they could use 'nslookup' on either the Linux box provided, or
> their own Windows PC's. ...

Please don't.  nslookup is a very blunt tool, occasionally comes very 
close to lying to you and, as you've found, obscures some information 
that you actually want to see.  Like this:

> ... In this instance the TTL is important. ...

> ... It may, however, be better to introduce them
> to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.

Do it.  Use host if you have to but stay away from nslookup.

Sam

-- 
Sam Wilson one of hostmas...@ed.ac.uk
Network Team, IT Infrastructure
Information Services, The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

adding new RR?

2009-10-15 Thread aihua zhang 
Hi,
   recently,i want to modify source code of BIND9.6.1 to adding new RR
.Now,i just begin to check  RR to see how it work,but i find this method
exhausting me.i don't think this way is effective,so i'm very appreciate
some one  could give me a guid, or some example:souce code is perfect

-- 
Best regards!

Sincerely,
xiao Tou
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Fr34k 
If you didn't know, you can download dig for Windows.

For example:
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6.1-P1/BIND9.6.1-P1.zip
Just stick dig.exe and the dll files in a directory that makes sense in your 
environment and enjoy!

HTH



- Original Message 
From: John Horne 
To: Bind users 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:46:27 AM
Subject: Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
> > 
> > How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
> 
> I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
> far more better tool for getting such information:
> 
I agree, it's not for me though :-)

I have to teach some Windows people about the DNS, and wanted to show
them that they could use 'nslookup' on either the Linux box provided, or
their own Windows PC's. In this instance the TTL is important. So I was
hoping that the MS and BIND nslookup commands would display something
pretty much similar to each other so as not to confuse the people too
much.

As far as I can tell no BIND 9 nslookup command shows the TTL. I am
currently looking at an 8.2.3 version to see if I can patch the 9.5.1
one to display TTL's again. It may, however, be better to introduce them
to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.



John.

-- 
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread John Horne 
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
> > 
> > How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
> 
> I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
> far more better tool for getting such information:
> 
I agree, it's not for me though :-)

I have to teach some Windows people about the DNS, and wanted to show
them that they could use 'nslookup' on either the Linux box provided, or
their own Windows PC's. In this instance the TTL is important. So I was
hoping that the MS and BIND nslookup commands would display something
pretty much similar to each other so as not to confuse the people too
much.

As far as I can tell no BIND 9 nslookup command shows the TTL. I am
currently looking at an 8.2.3 version to see if I can patch the 9.5.1
one to display TTL's again. It may, however, be better to introduce them
to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.



John.

-- 
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread Adam Tkac 
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
> Hello,

Hi,

> Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the
> TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or
> 'd2'. Example:
> 
> ==
> nslookup
> > set debug
> > www.plymouth.ac.uk
> Server: 127.0.0.1
> Address:127.0.0.1#53
> 
> 
> QUESTIONS:
> www.plymouth.ac.uk, type = A, class = IN
> ANSWERS:
> ->  www.plymouth.ac.uk
> canonical name = extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
> ->  extranet.plymouth.ac.uk
> internet address = 141.163.163.185
> AUTHORITY RECORDS:
> ->  plymouth.ac.uk
> nameserver = dns0.plymouth.ac.uk.
> ->  plymouth.ac.uk
> nameserver = dns1.plymouth.ac.uk.
> ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
> ->  dns0.plymouth.ac.uk
> internet address = 141.163.1.250
> ->  dns1.plymouth.ac.uk
> internet address = 141.163.177.1
> 
> www.plymouth.ac.uk  canonical name = extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
> Name:   extranet.plymouth.ac.uk
> Address: 141.163.163.185
> >
> ==
> 
> 
> How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?

I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
far more better tool for getting such information:


$ dig www.plymouth.ac.uk

; <<>> DiG 9.7.0a3-RedHat-9.7.0-0.5.a3.fc13 <<>> www.plymouth.ac.uk
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17054
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 2

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.plymouth.ac.uk.IN  A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.plymouth.ac.uk. 3143IN  CNAME
extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
extranet.plymouth.ac.uk. 85943  IN  A   141.163.163.185

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
plymouth.ac.uk. 85943   IN  NS  dns1.cs.strath.ac.uk.
plymouth.ac.uk. 85943   IN  NS  dns0.plymouth.ac.uk.
plymouth.ac.uk. 85943   IN  NS  dns1.plymouth.ac.uk.
plymouth.ac.uk. 85943   IN  NS  dns2.cs.strath.ac.uk.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
dns1.cs.strath.ac.uk.   42744   IN  A   130.159.196.126
dns2.cs.strath.ac.uk.   42743   IN  A   130.159.196.125


Regards, Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Nslookup not showng TTL

2009-10-15 Thread John Horne 
Hello,

Using BIND 9.5.1 it seems that the nslookup command is not showing the
TTL value of found records. It makes no difference if I set 'debug' or
'd2'. Example:

==
nslookup
> set debug
> www.plymouth.ac.uk
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53


QUESTIONS:
www.plymouth.ac.uk, type = A, class = IN
ANSWERS:
->  www.plymouth.ac.uk
canonical name = extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
->  extranet.plymouth.ac.uk
internet address = 141.163.163.185
AUTHORITY RECORDS:
->  plymouth.ac.uk
nameserver = dns0.plymouth.ac.uk.
->  plymouth.ac.uk
nameserver = dns1.plymouth.ac.uk.
ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
->  dns0.plymouth.ac.uk
internet address = 141.163.1.250
->  dns1.plymouth.ac.uk
internet address = 141.163.177.1

www.plymouth.ac.uk  canonical name = extranet.plymouth.ac.uk.
Name:   extranet.plymouth.ac.uk
Address: 141.163.163.185
>
==


How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?



Thanks,

John.

-- 
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users