Re: adding new RR?

2009-10-16 Thread aihua zhang
I have a project ,in this project i need  a Global-scale Mapping System,so
the first step i  just nedd to build small-private DNS-based enviroment,and
achieve my goal.
in order to accomplish these i  need to adding a new RR(eg. mapping_RR) and
creat a new domain(which maintain the mapping info,and the type of  mapping
info  is mapping_RR).
Now here is design,client-program send a mapping request,resolver can tell
the request type ,and send to proper domain-nameserver and send reply back.

yestoday, i have check lib\dns\rdata\in_1\_28.c,but i don't know the
whole project will work if i just  imitate _28.c to write a
mapping_RR.c  . if it doesn't work ,please direct me with some papers or
Independent Code. thanks!

2009/10/16 bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org

 Send bind-users mailing list submissions to
bind-users@lists.isc.org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
bind-users-ow...@lists.isc.org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of bind-users digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Nslookup not showng TTL (Kevin Darcy)
   2. Re: Nslookup not showng TTL (Sam Wilson)
   3. RE: Nslookup not showng TTL (Frank Bulk - iName.com)
   4. Re: Nslookup not showng TTL (John Horne)
   5. Re: Nslookup not showng TTL (Matthew Pounsett)
   6. Re: adding new RR?  (Mark Andrews)
   7. Re: Nslookup not showng TTL  (Mark Andrews)
   8. Re: Nslookup not showng TTL (Doug Barton)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:15:27 -0400
 From: Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
 Subject: Re: Nslookup not showng TTL
 To: Bind users bind-users@lists.isc.org
 Message-ID: 4ad758af.6020...@chrysler.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 John Horne wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 10:47 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
 
  On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:06:56AM +0100, John Horne wrote:
 
  How can I see the TTL value using nslookup?
 
  I'm not sure how force nslookup to show TTL but the `dig` utility is
  far more better tool for getting such information:
 
 
  I agree, it's not for me though :-)
 
  I have to teach some Windows people about the DNS, and wanted to show
  them that they could use 'nslookup' on either the Linux box provided, or
  their own Windows PC's. In this instance the TTL is important. So I was
  hoping that the MS and BIND nslookup commands would display something
  pretty much similar to each other so as not to confuse the people too
  much.
 
  As far as I can tell no BIND 9 nslookup command shows the TTL. I am
  currently looking at an 8.2.3 version to see if I can patch the 9.5.1
  one to display TTL's again. It may, however, be better to introduce them
  to dig rather than having to maintain the nslookup command.
 
 Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING and
 BURYING it. Forever.

 If I had a nickel for every time someone mis-read the output of nslookup
 and mistook the nameserver's name, for the name of the server they're
 actually looking up, well, let's just say I probably wouldn't be posting
 to bind-users from my work account...

 (Fortunately nslookup's whole won't do a lookup because I can't
 reverse-resolve my resolver bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler,
 since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but that's another popular
 nslookup sucks, don't use it-category posting to this mailing list)


   - Kevin




 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:28:14 +0100
 From: Sam Wilson sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk
 Subject: Re: Nslookup not showng TTL
 To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
 Message-ID: sam.wilson-c03ecd.18281415102...@scotsman.ed.ac.uk

 In article mailman.715.1255626934.14796.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
  Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:

  (Fortunately nslookup's whole won't do a lookup because I can't
  reverse-resolve my resolver bogosity isn't really an issue at Chrysler,
  since we maintain proper reverse mappings, but that's another popular
  nslookup sucks, don't use it-category posting to this mailing list)

 Fortunately (or not - it would be another nail) that bogosity is gone
 from recent nslookups.

 Sam


 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:37:50 -0500
 From: Frank Bulk - iName.com frnk...@iname.com
 Subject: RE: Nslookup not showng TTL
 To: 'John Horne' john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk, Bind users
bind-users@lists.isc.org
 Message-ID:

  
 !!AAAuAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQTbSgAABByxxjEVKg2S57lnbEsu38YAQA=@
 iname.com

 Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

 You can do an ipconfig /displaydns to see some TTL info.

 Frank

 

Name server names

2009-10-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
Curious - We have name servers in our primary domain so those are the
FQDN names we put at Registrar and at network provider.

 

Is there any reason we can't also have separate external IPs and names
pointing to the same DNS servers for our separate domains (NATted in of
course)?   That is to say does DNS care what the actual hostname of the
DNS server is or does it only use the lookups to determine this
information?
 

Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--
inline: SGK01.jpg___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

BIND performance issues

2009-10-16 Thread Rob Z
Hello,
we are running a BIND 9.6.1-P1 on a SPARC T2000 / Solaris 10 for a recursive
DNS server.
I set up a simple MRTG monitoring tool which basically runs dig . and
parses the output to find out a response time.
The typical response time is 1ms.
Workload on the server sometimes gradually increases, but the DNS servers
response time is not increasing proportionally.
When the number of requests hits about 5500/sec the DNS response time
abruptly goes down to 400-500ms.
The load average and processor utilization do increase proportionally to the
number of requests.
The problem starts when the load average gets to about 10 and  named binary
consumes about 55% of CPU time.
There are no network or protocol errors (except  insignificant number of
udpInErrors), no heavy disk I/O.
Just curious if anybody else observed a similar behavior.
Any ideas are greatly appreciated.
--
Rob
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users