[blfs-support] 回复： AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
Thanks Ken and Armin. I'll have a try and give the result later. On 06/29/2012 12:44 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:29:41AM +0800, Omar wrote: Just attachment of this mail. If you need to compress a large file to attach it, use a linux compressor - 99% of people here cannot open rar files. In this case, I don't think we need it. Luckily I had unrar installed when I updated it in the book, but I am strongly against using it in Linux based stuff. Zip could be ok since most of us may already have it if building mozilla products or such, but not rar. Thank you all. 1. My environment is based on LFS7.1 on VMware. Google thinks you need the correct options when building Mesa. According to debian bug 652501 you need the svga gallium driver. That driver is enabled in the book's instructions for Mesa. ĸen To be more specific, you need gallium svga driver AND libxatracker (--enable-xa in Mesa instructions). That is already enabled in default Mesa instructions in BLFS, and Xorg VMware driver will pick it up. But, you need vmwgfx kernel driver, which is now in the place as the other DRM drivers in kernel, but is in staging area in pre 3.3 kernels. It is not enabled by default tough in any case. And the last point is ... Your host system needs to have working 3D stuff. On windows host, any DirectX9 capable card should work very well, including some newer i915, possibly r200 ones and geforce4 or better. ones. I had hard time getting 3D acceleration to work on Linux hosts and Intel card. It wouldn't be of any problem with propretary ATI or NVidia, but since intel is open source, and VMware player needs s3tc GL extension which is patented by SIS so Mesa devs can't integrate it in Mesa source tree. There is however external library at freedesktop.org for that, and I just got that last night after few months of giving up on 3d in vmware! I guess same thing would be needed for open source radeon and nouveau drivers. Also, for good 3D support, you need at least Player 4.0 or Workstation 8.0. There is some 3D support in Player 3.1/Workstation 7.1, but not that good. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： 回复： AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
The mail with attachment may be on the way. Send the mail without it again. T hanks Armin. I've fixed the errors which you pointed. The following is the status now. libGL: screen 0 does not appear to be DRI2 capable libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so libGL: Can't open configuration file /etc/drirc: No such file or directory. libGL: Can't open configuration file /root/.drirc: No such file or directory. .. [ 962.866] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable [ 962.867] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable [ 962.908] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized swrast The messages above is still there. I extract some new messages I consider important below. [ 24.861] (WW) vmware(0): Disabling 3D support. [ 24.861] (WW) vmware(0): Disabling Render Acceleration. [ 24.861] (WW) vmware(0): Disabling RandR12+ support. [ 24.862] (--) vmware(0): VMware SVGA regs at (0x10d0, 0x10d1) ... [ 25.096] (II) vmware(0): Not using default mode 320x175 (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan) ... [ 25.133] (II) UnloadModule: vesa [ 25.133] (II) Unloading vesa [ 25.133] (II) UnloadModule: fbdev [ 25.133] (II) Unloading fbdev [ 25.133] (II) UnloadSubModule: fbdevhw [ 25.133] (II) Unloading fbdevhw I will find them in kernel again. Omar -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
Hi all, When checking DRI from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in section Xorg-7.7-1 Testing and Configuration I can't find messages like (II) R128(0): Direct rendering enabled and (II) intel(0): direct rendering: DRI2 Enabled. The log just tells me that Load Module DRI2... Load Module DRI... . [ 26.680] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable [ 26.680] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable I considered whether it was the problem of kernel but I can't find any kernel options about AIGLX. (I can start up xinit, xterm and xclock now.) Thanks in advance for any suggestions. BTW, in the part Setting up X Input Devices whether it is a mistake in writing about /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/xkb-defaults.conf and so on. I remember /etc/X11 is the symbolic link to /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d, then it could be /etc/X11/xkb-defaults.conf, right? Omar -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
Thank you all. 1. My environment is based on LFS7.1 on VMware. 2. I have added user root and omar which will use X to group video. 3. R128(0) is not what I use, just the result of the book what I can't find. 4. The following is some messages about rendering and AIGLX and I will post another mail with the attachment of whole log which is larger than 50K and need be passed by administrator. libGL: screen 0 does not appear to be DRI2 capable libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so libGL: Can't open configuration file /etc/drirc: No such file or directory. libGL: Can't open configuration file /root/.drirc: No such file or directory. name of display: :0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes server glx vendor string: SGI server glx version string: 1.4 .. [ 962.866] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable [ 962.867] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable [ 962.908] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized swrast Thank you all again. Omar When checking DRI from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in section Xorg-7.7-1 Testing and Configuration I can't find messages like (II) R128(0): Direct rendering enabled and (II) intel(0): direct rendering: DRI2 Enabled. The log just tells me that Load Module DRI2... Load Module DRI... . [ 26.680] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable [ 26.680] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable [...] Alright, I think Ken or Andy asked same question about direct rendering. Turned out they weren't members of video group. Check if your user is member of that group by running groups as that user. If not, add yourself to the video group and log in again. Another possibility might be older card. I see you mention r128, and that driver is old and I think there isn't any DRI driver for it in Mesa 8.0. There is DRI driver tough, in Kernel - Drivers - Graphics - Direct Rendering or something like that. If all fails, you can post whole Xorg.0.log so we could check it out. Yes, it was me and that solved the problem on my old radeon r200. If I'm reading Omar correctly, he hasn't said *what* video card he is using (nor which video driver). They are key to this. The 'R128' is what the book gives as an example. Perhaps we should suggest a different test, to be run from an xterm or similar. Neither of these will help diagnose Omar's problem, but we could use $glxinfo | grep renderer (software rendering means DRI, not DRI2), or just report on AIGLX $grep AIGLX /var/log/Xorg.0.log Wikipedia suggests that AIGLX depends on the xorg video driver - ati (radeon), intel (i810 and later) and nouveau should work, others might not. ĸen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： 回复： AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
Just attachment of this mail. Thank you all. 1. My environment is based on LFS7.1 on VMware. 2. I have added user root and omar which will use X to group video. 3. R128(0) is not what I use, just the result of the book what I can't find. 4. The following is some messages about rendering and AIGLX and I will post another mail with the attachment of whole log which is larger than 50K and need be passed by administrator. log.rar Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： 回复： Polkit-0.106 make check error
Test really does not matter since consolekit isn't running there. It would be running if: You compiled pam module and enabled it, then it would be started at login or you started your X session using ck-launch-session (in which case we also RECOMMEND using linux pam or your session might become non active), and you won't be able to do some administrative stuff in Gnome, KDE, Xfce and such. 1. When running make it shows some messages in the middle of the process as the following. I have installed libxslt-1.1.26 but not done xmlto-0.0.25. Is it the reason? Have you installed docbook-xml and docbook-xsl ? Yes, I have installed docbook-xml-4.5 and docbook-xsl-1.77.0 before this operation. Omar -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： Polkit-0.106 make check error
How to deal with error of make check in the Polkit-0.106? It
shows that:
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/polkitbackend'
/PolkitBackendJsAuthority/get_admin_identities: Error getting system bus:
Could not connect: No such file or directoryError loading
/var/run/ConsoleKit/database: Error statting file
/var/run/ConsoleKit/database:
No such file or directory
**
(/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/polkitbackend/.libs/lt-polkitbackendjsauthoritytest:11979):
WARNING **: Error getting system bus: Could not connect: No such file or
directory
/bin/sh: line 5: 11979 Trace/breakpoint trap
/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/mocklibc/bin/mocklibc ${dir}$tst
FAIL: polkitbackendjsauthoritytest
D-Bus daemon isn't running and ConsoleKit isn't installed nor session is
set up.
Thanks Armin.
I have installed D-Bus and ConsoleKit(without PAM) and run. Tests of Polkit has
prompted all pass and I have installed it.
But I still have some questions about the process of installing Polkit. I'm not
sure whether it doesn't matter.
1. When running make it shows some messages in the middle of the process as
the following. I have installed libxslt-1.1.26 but not done xmlto-0.0.25. Is it
the reason?
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/polkit-0.106/docs/man'
/usr/bin/xsltproc -nonet --stringparam man.base.url.for.relative.links
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/polkit-1/ --xinclude
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
polkit.xml
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: polkitd.8.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkcheck.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: PolkitAgentTextListener-struct.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkttyagent.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkaction.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkexec.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: PolkitIdentity-struct.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkexec.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkexec.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: polkitd.8.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkaction.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkcheck.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkexec.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkttyagent.1.
Note: Writing polkit.8
..
/usr/bin/xsltproc -nonet --stringparam man.base.url.for.relative.links
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/polkit-1/ --xinclude
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
pkttyagent.xml
Error: no ID for constraint linkend:
eggdbus-signal-org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.Authority::Changed.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: polkit.8.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: polkitd.8.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkaction.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkcheck.1.
Error: no ID for constraint linkend: pkexec.1.
Note: Writing pkttyagent.1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/polkit-0.106/docs/man'
Making all in polkit
2. When running make check the prompt changes to the following. It still
contains errors like below in the process though at last is OK.
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/polkitbackend'
/PolkitBackendJsAuthority/get_admin_identities: Error loading
/var/run/ConsoleKit/database: Error statting file /var/run/ConsoleKit/database:
No such file or directory11:23:06.357: Loading rules from directory
/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/data/etc/polkit-1/rules.d
11:23:06.357: Loading rules from directory
/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/data/usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d
11:23:06.363: Finished loading, compiling and executing 4 rules
Error loading /var/run/ConsoleKit/database: Error statting file
/var/run/ConsoleKit/database: No such file or directory11:23:06.385: Loading
rules from directory /tmp/polkit-0.106/test/data/etc/polkit-1/rules.d
..
OK
PASS: polkitbackendjsauthoritytest
=
1 test passed
=
Omar
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Polkit-0.106 make check error
Hi all,
How to deal with error of make check in the Polkit-0.106? It shows that:
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/polkitbackend'
/PolkitBackendJsAuthority/get_admin_identities: Error getting system bus: Could
not connect: No such file or directoryError loading
/var/run/ConsoleKit/database: Error statting file /var/run/ConsoleKit/database:
No such file or directory
**
(/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/polkitbackend/.libs/lt-polkitbackendjsauthoritytest:11979):
WARNING **: Error getting system bus: Could not connect: No such file or
directory
/bin/sh: line 5: 11979 Trace/breakpoint trap
/tmp/polkit-0.106/test/mocklibc/bin/mocklibc ${dir}$tst
FAIL: polkitbackendjsauthoritytest
Thanks.
Omar
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： 回复： libwww-perl-6.04
Thank you very much for your detailed explanation, Ken. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:47:26AM +0800, Omar wrote: Thanks Ken. The following is software dependencies. I want to build AccountsService-0.6.21 in the first section of chapter 4, which requires Polkit-0.106. Then Polkit-0.106 requires intltool-0.50.0, intltool-0.50.0 requires XML::Parser-2.41, XML::Parser-2.41 requires libwww-perl-6.04 (optionally used during the tests) in section Perl Modules of chapter 13. Do you mean that I needn't install libwww-perl-6.04? Does it affect the tests though it is optional? No, I mean that most people here never run the tests in BLFS. For some packages, the testsuite is clearly intended to be run by the package's developer, as part of a pre-release test. For others, the tests are about corner-cases. We generally take that view that passing, or failing, a testsuite has little connection with whether the package works correctly. Also, as far as I can see, there is only one reason to build AccountsService - you intent to build gnome. Several of the gnome packages list it as a dependency, nothing else seems to. BTW, I'm really in doubt now not only in this problem but also about how am I going on according to BLFS book. In the introduction of book it is said that I can elect what I need by myself. If it means that permissive range is all sections from chapter 4 to the end. For example my aim is generating X window, but I don't really know which packages I must build and which section I should start in, chapter 4 or directly chapter 24. X Window System Environment. Now my improvement is very slow. Give me some ideas please. Thanks. Omar OK. The book is not intended to be read linearly. Find what you want to install, then work back through the dependencies. 1. Keep notes on what you build - in particular the order you build the packages, and any changes you make to the commands. For some packages, particular in the audio and video area, there are a lot of extra configure switches available, to make them use optional dependencies. 2. As you become more experienced, you will want to script your builds of packages. When you do that, try to catch errors. 3. The book is big. Getting towards your desired desktop takes a long time. It is much easier if you break it up into discrete stages. In my own case the brekdown used to be : (i) things I want before I even try to boot - in my case, this includes fcron, ssh, nfs, smartmontools, pkg-config, postfix, lynx, and (now) many other packages. You won't want or need all of these. My needs here are increased because my sources, scripts, notes, and mail, are on my server. Some of these, such as pkg-config and which, should come at the beginning of everyone's desktop builds. (ii.) things needed by the xorg packages, e.g. gperf, libpng, freetype, fontconfig, intltool. I now build Python2, pcre, libxml2, libxslt, XML-Parser, XML-Simple, xmlto here. And intltool. (iii.) xorg itself - including libdrm, Mesa, xcb, fonts. I long ago changed from xterm to rxvt-unicode, and I build fluxbox instead of twm [ no point inflicting pain on myself :) ]. At this point, I can use xorg. If it doesn't work, time to work out why and fix the configuration or the build. (iv.) graphics libs and toolkits - the basic packages needed to build modern desktop packages. Here, I'll list the packages in order: jpegsrc, libtiff, gif-lib, iso-codes, d-bus, icon-naming-utils, startup-notification, glib2, cairo, gtk-doc, dbus-glib, hicolor-icon-theme, desktop-file-utils, gobject-introspection, pango, atk, shared-mime-info, cups [ so that when the printing programs are all installed, gtk applications will be able to find the cups queue(s) ], gdk-pixbuf, gtk+-2, gtk+-3, polkit (I'm still on 0.105, so I don't need SpiderMonkey), GConf3, bc, xscreensaver. Again, you might not want all of those, but if you are going to use gnome you will probably need most of them. This order works for me. With those installed, I can move to my preferred window manager (icewm-1.3). From the book, openbox can be built now. This script used to include firefox - before html5, it used to be simple (just nss, nspr, sqlite3), but now I build a *large* number of audio/video tools first. You can probably use the shipped versions of the packages in firefox, at least in the beginning : I prefer to use system libraries. Once you have a graphical browser, it becomes much easier to search for help! (v.) image (photo) manipulation and printing, plus the ability to look at PDFs. (vi.) office applications (gnome, abiword), most of the audio/video applications (gstreamer comes later, for me) (vii.) the parts of gnome which I build, and some runtime stuff (e.g. gvfs). 4. Don't expect to get it all correct at first. Once it is all good enough for your requirements, remember
[blfs-support] wget: unable to resolve host address
Hi, all, I used wget to download and got the following prompt. http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/files/BLFS/svn/xorg/proto-7.7-1.md5 Resolving anduin.linuxfromscratch.org... failed: Name or service not known. wget: unable to resolve host address `anduin.linuxfromscratch.org' I doubt that my parsing of domain name is wrong. For other example I can get response from ping 192.168.x.x but can't from ping www.google.com and it tells me unknown host. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Omar -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： libwww-perl-6.04
Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Warning: prerequisite Encode::Locale 0 not found. Warning: prerequisite File::Listing 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Cookies 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Daemon 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Date 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Negotiate 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Request 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Request::Common 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Response 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Status 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite LWP::MediaTypes 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite Net::HTTP 6 not found. Warning: prerequisite WWW::RobotRules 6 not found. Writing Makefile for LWP Writing MYMETA.yml Are these warnings ignored? The perl build system predates the 'configure; make; make install' system which most packages now use. These warnings are the same as warnings from a configure script - the developer wants to bring them to your attention. Like many other perl modules, this package is not much use on its own, it's normally installed because something else requires it. Maybe a later package will need it, or perhaps it's needed by your own scripts. I have to guess here, because as far as I can remember this package isn't in the BLFS book. The test, as always, is whether it provides what it's user is looking for. That is almost certainly a run-time test : either your application or script works without these other libwww dependencies, or it doesn't. FWIW, I have exactly one package on my desktops which needs libwww-perl. I've stuck with libwww-perl-5 (currently I'm using 5.837) because these dependencies (plus any packages that they themselves might require) are new in 6. I assume that some of them are for extra functionality, but it's possible that some of the existing functionality now requires these other packages. For me, libwww-perl-5.834 had worked fine in my one limited use of it, so I was not inclined to add a whole host of extra packages. If you know that you need libwww-perl-6, rather than just libwww-perl, then you probably want some or all of these dependencies. If in doubt, read any documentation in libwww-perl, or in it's website if there is one, or at CPAN. ĸen Thanks Ken. The following is software dependencies. I want to build AccountsService-0.6.21 in the first section of chapter 4, which requires Polkit-0.106. Then Polkit-0.106 requires intltool-0.50.0, intltool-0.50.0 requires XML::Parser-2.41, XML::Parser-2.41 requires libwww-perl-6.04 (optionally used during the tests) in section Perl Modules of chapter 13. Do you mean that I needn't install libwww-perl-6.04? Does it affect the tests though it is optional? BTW, I'm really in doubt now not only in this problem but also about how am I going on according to BLFS book. In the introduction of book it is said that I can elect what I need by myself. If it means that permissive range is all sections from chapter 4 to the end. For example my aim is generating X window, but I don't really know which packages I must build and which section I should start in, chapter 4 or directly chapter 24. X Window System Environment. Now my improvement is very slow. Give me some ideas please. Thanks. Omar -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] SpiderMonkey-1.0.0
Hi, all, Another problem! When doing make check it gives me 9 TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAILs in jit_test.py | /tmp/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js. Configure and make are all correct. I find that in SVN there is a js185-1.0.0-DESTDIR-1.patch but it seems not relative to this problem. The attachment is one of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAILs. Thanks.Omar log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： SpiderMonkey-1.0.0
Hi, all, Another problem! When doing make check it gives me 9 TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAILs in jit_test.py | /tmp/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js. Configure and make are all correct. I find that in SVN there is a js185-1.0.0-DESTDIR-1.patch but it seems not relative to this problem. The attachment is one of TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAILs. Thanks.Omar Looking at my notes from January, I too had 9 failures - I suppose I took the view that this was few enough failures not to worry about it. In general, I don't believe it is worth running the tests for most desktop packages. I'll also note that the output from the testsuite is hard to read, but at the end I get: FAILURES: /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -m /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -j /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -m -j /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -m -j -p /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -a -m /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -a -m -j /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -a -m -j -p /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js -a -m -d /home/ken/js-1.8.5/js-1.8.5/js/src/jit-test/tests/sunspider/check-date-format-tofte.js If you google for check-date-format-tofte.js you will find it has a history of failures. e.g. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600522 and in particular https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530974#c5 (comments 5 and 7). Using TZ=America/Los_Angeles or TZ=US/Pacific in the environment for 'make check', the tests pass for me. I'll add a comment to the book. ĸen -- Yes, it passes. Thank you, Ken.-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： 回复： 回复： attr-2.4.46 test
I find that the failed are related to locale. It appears in the error log that: ... ... failed perl: warning: Setting locale failed. != # file: 1/sub/link perl: warning: Please check your locale settings: != user.a LANGUAGE = (unset), != LC_ALL = (unset), != # file: 1/sub/link/link-file LANG = en_US.ISO-8859-1@euro != user.a I delete @euro , fix the locale and run test again. The tests and root-tests have passed and the ext-tests has 4 failed. Now it's the same to Bruce. are supported and installed on your system. != perl: warning: Failing back to the standard locale (C). != ~ # file: 1/sub/link/ != ~ user.a != ~ != ~ # file: 1/sub/link/link-file != ~ user.a != ~ != ~ Thanks Bruce. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] attr-2.4.46 test
Hi, all, I encountered a problem when testing attr-2.4.46 using make tests root-tests ext-tests command. I'm sure that my file system ext3 supports extended attributes (I contained it in kernel configuration). When the test finished it showed 107 commands (34 passed, 73 failed) make [1]:*** [attr.test]Error 73 make [1]:leave directory '/tmp/attr-2.4.46/test' make: *** [tests] Error 2 Is it a fatal problem which I must fix or ignored to go on with the next command make install? Thanks in advance. Omar -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： attr-2.4.46 test
Thanks Bruce. According to you it improves a bit. Now it shows: I encountered a problem when testing attr-2.4.46 using make tests root-tests ext-tests command. I'm sure that my file system ext3 supports extended attributes (I contained it in kernel configuration). When the test finished it showed 107 commands (34 passed, 73 failed) make [1]:*** [attr.test]Error 73 make [1]:leave directory '/tmp/attr-2.4.46/test' make: *** [tests] Error 2 Is it a fatal problem which I must fix or ignored to go on with the next command make install? Yes, I think there is something wrong. I have: $ make -C test/ tests ... 107 commands (107 passed, 0 failed) 107 commands (94 passed, 13 failed) $ sudo make -C test/ root-tests make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/attr/attr-2.4.46/test' Note: Tests must run as root 29 commands (29 passed, 0 failed) 29 commands (20 passed, 9 failed) $ make -C test/ ext-tests ... 20 commands (16 passed, 4 failed) I'm not sure why I got the 4 ext-tests failures. the same to you. I'm guessing that you have extended attributes set for some other file systems like reiser, xfs, or jfs, but don't have any of those filesystems available. Yes. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] 回复： 回复： attr-2.4.46 test
I find that the failed are related to locale. It appears in the error log that: ... ... failed perl: warning: Setting locale failed. != # file: 1/sub/link perl: warning: Please check your locale settings: != user.a LANGUAGE = (unset), != LC_ALL = (unset), != # file: 1/sub/link/link-file LANG = en_US.ISO-8859-1@euro != user.a are supported and installed on your system. != perl: warning: Failing back to the standard locale (C). != ~ # file: 1/sub/link/ != ~ user.a != ~ != ~ # file: 1/sub/link/link-file != ~ user.a != ~ != ~ Thanks Bruce. According to you it improves a bit. Now it shows: I encountered a problem when testing attr-2.4.46 using make tests root-tests ext-tests command. I'm sure that my file system ext3 supports extended attributes (I contained it in kernel configuration). When the test finished it showed 107 commands (34 passed, 73 failed) make [1]:*** [attr.test]Error 73 make [1]:leave directory '/tmp/attr-2.4.46/test' make: *** [tests] Error 2 Is it a fatal problem which I must fix or ignored to go on with the next command make install? Yes, I think there is something wrong. I have: $ make -C test/ tests ... 107 commands (107 passed, 0 failed) 107 commands (94 passed, 13 failed) $ sudo make -C test/ root-tests make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/attr/attr-2.4.46/test' Note: Tests must run as root 29 commands (29 passed, 0 failed) 29 commands (20 passed, 9 failed) $ make -C test/ ext-tests ... 20 commands (16 passed, 4 failed) I'm not sure why I got the 4 ext-tests failures. the same to you. I'm guessing that you have extended attributes set for some other file systems like reiser, xfs, or jfs, but don't have any of those filesystems available. Yes. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
