Re: programmable completion: completing filenames with default Readline behavior
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 10/1/13 4:55 PM, Jeremy Lin wrote: > >> Thanks, I actually ended up with the same solution (for Bash 4.0 and above, >> where 'compopt' is available, anyway). I just set '+o default' at the top of >> the >> completion function and then set '-o default' as needed. Unfortunately, for >> earlier versions of Bash, the workaround I mentioned previously seems to be >> about as good as it gets. > > Earlier versions of bash are pretty old; bash-4.0 came out almost five > years ago. I know what you mean, but for one reason or another, there are still a fair number of people stuck on RHEL/CentOS 5.x, and hence using 3.2. Hopefully there will be far fewer such people within the next few years... >> In future versions of Bash, it would be nice if the default Readline >> completion >> could be invoked explicitly, rather than requiring this 'compopt' workaround. > > What syntax would you suggest for doing that? It may require inventing a > new way for completion functions to interact with their calling environment. If COMPREPLY could be something other than an array, that might be used to indicate that some other behavior is desired. For example, perhaps COMPREPLY='complete-filename' could produce the behavior you currently get with '-o default' and COMPREPLY=(), but without needing to set '-o default', of course. I'm not sure how cleanly this would fit into the current scheme of things, but it's just an idea. Jeremy
Re: programmable completion: completing filenames with default Readline behavior
On 10/1/13 4:55 PM, Jeremy Lin wrote: > Thanks, I actually ended up with the same solution (for Bash 4.0 and above, > where 'compopt' is available, anyway). I just set '+o default' at the top of > the > completion function and then set '-o default' as needed. Unfortunately, for > earlier versions of Bash, the workaround I mentioned previously seems to be > about as good as it gets. Earlier versions of bash are pretty old; bash-4.0 came out almost five years ago. > In future versions of Bash, it would be nice if the default Readline > completion > could be invoked explicitly, rather than requiring this 'compopt' workaround. What syntax would you suggest for doing that? It may require inventing a new way for completion functions to interact with their calling environment. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRUc...@case.eduhttp://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
Re: programmable completion: completing filenames with default Readline behavior
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 9/27/13 3:57 AM, Jeremy Lin wrote: >> I'm writing a completion where, in some cases, I'd like to use >> COMPREPLY=() to indicate that no more arguments to a command are >> expected, but in other cases, I'd like to offer the default Readline >> behavior for filename completions. >> >> So, if I have a directory 'foo', I'd like the shell to first complete >> with 'foo/' and then offer to complete files under 'foo'. But if I do >> something like COMPREPLY=($(compgen -f -- "$cur")), then I simply get >> a completion of 'foo' (with a space appended). >> >> I know I can pass "-o default" to get Readline's default filename >> completion when COMPREPLY is empty, but then that seems to preclude >> using COMPREPLY=() to deny completions. > > The `compopt' builtin was intended to add this kind of dynamism to > programmable completion shell functions. You can install a completion > without -o default and turn it on using compopt when the completion > function is executed. It appears to be lightly used, so there are > probably some usability improvements to be made there. For instance, I > think that options, once set using compopt, remain set and need to be > manually disabled. I'm waiting for some more reports from people using > it before I decide how (or whether) to change it. > > Chet Thanks, I actually ended up with the same solution (for Bash 4.0 and above, where 'compopt' is available, anyway). I just set '+o default' at the top of the completion function and then set '-o default' as needed. Unfortunately, for earlier versions of Bash, the workaround I mentioned previously seems to be about as good as it gets. In future versions of Bash, it would be nice if the default Readline completion could be invoked explicitly, rather than requiring this 'compopt' workaround. Jeremy
Re: programmable completion: completing filenames with default Readline behavior
On 9/27/13 3:57 AM, Jeremy Lin wrote: > I'm writing a completion where, in some cases, I'd like to use > COMPREPLY=() to indicate that no more arguments to a command are > expected, but in other cases, I'd like to offer the default Readline > behavior for filename completions. > > So, if I have a directory 'foo', I'd like the shell to first complete > with 'foo/' and then offer to complete files under 'foo'. But if I do > something like COMPREPLY=($(compgen -f -- "$cur")), then I simply get > a completion of 'foo' (with a space appended). > > I know I can pass "-o default" to get Readline's default filename > completion when COMPREPLY is empty, but then that seems to preclude > using COMPREPLY=() to deny completions. The `compopt' builtin was intended to add this kind of dynamism to programmable completion shell functions. You can install a completion without -o default and turn it on using compopt when the completion function is executed. It appears to be lightly used, so there are probably some usability improvements to be made there. For instance, I think that options, once set using compopt, remain set and need to be manually disabled. I'm waiting for some more reports from people using it before I decide how (or whether) to change it. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRUc...@case.eduhttp://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
programmable completion: completing filenames with default Readline behavior
I'm writing a completion where, in some cases, I'd like to use
COMPREPLY=() to indicate that no more arguments to a command are
expected, but in other cases, I'd like to offer the default Readline
behavior for filename completions.
So, if I have a directory 'foo', I'd like the shell to first complete
with 'foo/' and then offer to complete files under 'foo'. But if I do
something like COMPREPLY=($(compgen -f -- "$cur")), then I simply get
a completion of 'foo' (with a space appended).
I know I can pass "-o default" to get Readline's default filename
completion when COMPREPLY is empty, but then that seems to preclude
using COMPREPLY=() to deny completions.
I've tried a number of different workarounds, none of which I was
completely happy with (or I probably wouldn't be asking this
question). The closest I got was setting "-o default", and then using
COMPREPLY=("") to semi-deny completion, and COMPREPLY=() to get
filename completion.
Can anyone offer a better approach?
Thanks,
Jeremy
