[Bug binutils/24262] bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24262 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_33-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=443adfa40984bede981c883b6efcaf493ba77957 commit 443adfa40984bede981c883b6efcaf493ba77957 Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Sep 26 16:20:35 2019 +0930 PR24262, plugin search dir doesn't respect --libdir bfd/ PR 24262 * Makefile.am (AM_CPPFLAGS): Add -DLIBDIR. * plugin.c (load_plugin): Search both ${libdir}/bfd-plugins and ${bindir}/../lib/bfd-plugins if different. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. ld/ PR 24262 * ld.texi (-plugin): Revert 2019-03-15 change. (cherry picked from commit 41f37a6fb71f2a3de388108f5cdfca9cbe6e9d51) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/24262] bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24262 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=41f37a6fb71f2a3de388108f5cdfca9cbe6e9d51 commit 41f37a6fb71f2a3de388108f5cdfca9cbe6e9d51 Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Sep 26 16:20:35 2019 +0930 PR24262, plugin search dir doesn't respect --libdir bfd/ PR 24262 * Makefile.am (AM_CPPFLAGS): Add -DLIBDIR. * plugin.c (load_plugin): Search both ${libdir}/bfd-plugins and ${bindir}/../lib/bfd-plugins if different. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. ld/ PR 24262 * ld.texi (-plugin): Revert 2019-03-15 change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/24262] bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24262 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Christian, You are right, there is a discrepancy, and whilst I agree that ../lib64/bfd-plugins would be a more reasonable path component for 64-bit plugins, I think that it is too late to change it now. So instead I have checked in a patch to update the documentation. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/24262] bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24262 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1c82ed745bec154a3cd8a8bbf36c5be5086041d5 commit 1c82ed745bec154a3cd8a8bbf36c5be5086041d5 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Fri Mar 15 12:08:56 2019 + Update the documentation describing where the linker will attempt to locate plugins. PR 24262 * ld.texi (-plugin): Correct the path used to locate linker plugins. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils