Re: Moving Cake Folder

2008-12-16 Thread Ed Howland 

I also suggest considering using svn:externals. I created a new
repository for just the cake dir, and imprted the nightly into it.
Every time I do an update, it checks the external for any updates as
well,

Ed

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Sam Sherlock  wrote:
> put "C:\wamp\cake" in you include path either in you php.ini or your
> "httpd-vhosts.conf"
>
> eg in php.ini
> include_path =
> ".;d:\php-5.2.6\includes;d:\php-5.2.6\PEAR;C:\wamp\cake;C:\wamp\simpletest"
> ; windows include path
>
> or in vhosts
> php_value include_path
> ".;d:\php-5.2.6\includes;d:\php-5.2.6\PEAR;C:\wamp\cake;C:\wamp\simpletest"
> ; windows include path
>
>
>
> 2008/12/16 Penfold 
>>
>> I have developed a Cake application in a folder which holds a RC3
>> version of the Cake.
>> I would like to separate my application and cake to ease upgrading and
>> use the same Cake Files for multiple projects.
>>
>> I currently have cake installed at C:\wamp\www\[projectname] i would
>> like to have cake in C:\wamp\cake
>> so i can use bake "cake bake [projectname]" and all projects share the
>> cake files.
>>
>> I know how to do this for all new projects but is there anything i
>> need to change in my existing project to work with the new setup?
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-13 Thread Ed Howland 

You seem to be rught Mark, But why does this dependency exist in the
first place?

Ed

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:36 AM, mark_story  wrote:
>
> Ed, looks like those fails are on the schema and containable classes,
> not the model.  And as you found out bake doesn't search through every
> related model to add fixtures from.  It only goes one level deep, you
> need to manually add all the missing fixtures.
>
> -Mark
>
> On Dec 12, 5:53 pm, "Ed Howland"  wrote:
>> I forgot to mention that I am still getting the previous errors on the
>> Core/model tests.
>> --
>> Ed Howlandhttp://greenprogrammer.blogspot.comhttp://twitter.com/ed_howland
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Trouble with Model associations

2008-12-12 Thread Ed Howland 

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Sanfly  wrote:
>
> Okay then, lets say I change the member_years to member_payments, and
> just have the member_id and payment_id fields (remove the year field).
>
> So long as I manage to link up these fields, I should be able to
> extrapolate the "Year" data from the payment data anyway
>
> Even so, I cant figure out how to link the three tables.  Help!

I am not sure you need to go to HABTM for your app. Are you saying
that there is more than one member per payment, instead of just
members have many payments? The year field is in payment anyway. Why
not just set Payment belongs_to Member and Member has_many payments?

Ed

>
>
>
> On Dec 13, 10:11 am, "Marcelo Andrade"  wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Sanfly  wrote:
>>
>> > I have three tables im trying to connect:
>>
>> > 1.  members  (primary key is 'id')
>> > 2.  payments  (primary Key is 'id')
>>
>> > and then because each year that the person is a member, and they need
>> > to pay their membership fees, I've got another table
>>
>> > 3.  member_years, the fields are:  member_id, payment_id, year
>>
>> > What sort of model associations do I need to link all these together
>> > when necessary?  I've been trying things out for a couple of days now
>> > with no success :(  Any help would be appreciated
>>
>> Not sure if I understood your problem.
>>
>> Shouldn't your join table at item 3 be
>> named to "member_payment" according to
>> Cake conventions?  If not, maybe you
>> must consider use another model for this
>> information about the years.  But like
>> I said, I'm not sure...
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> MARCELO DE F. ANDRADE (aka "eleKtron")
>> Belem, PA, Amazonia, Brazil
>> Linux User #221105
>>
>> [...@pará ~]# linkshttp://pa.slackwarebrasil.org/
>>
>> For Libby's backstory be told on 
>> Losthttp://www.petitiononline.com/libby423/petition.html
>
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-12 Thread Ed Howland 

I forgot to mention that I am still getting the previous errors on the
Core/model tests.
-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-12 Thread Ed Howland 

Ok, final update. All my tests are now passing!

The trick was to make sure that ALL the down-chain fixtures get
loaded. This applies to both belongs_to and has_many. The bake scripts
did not fully populate the var $fixtures. I am not sure this is a bug
because of the order of my baking the models and creating the db
tables.

So I'd suggest creating all the DB tables before baking models. Then
double check the fullest extent of fixtures get loaded in the tests.

Overall, this seems to me to not be a necessary dependency. In
RSpec/Rails you can be very fine grained about what fixtures you want
to load. So you can load a single fixture for that model's table and
ignore any belongs_to or has_many associations.

Ed

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ed Howland  wrote:
> Ok, currently (nightly build 12/12/2008) I am seeing the following.
>
> First, I re-baked all models to get new fixtures and test cases.
>
> 1. Any leaf model w.o any associations works fine.
> 2. Any leaf model that has a has_many association, doesn't seem to
> create that table.
> 3. Any model with a single depth belongs_to association works fine
> 4. Any model that belongs_to a model that belongs_to another model
> doesn't create the furthest model in the chain.
>
> I am not sure that final one is a consistent symptom. But I had a 4
> way indirect chain and it bombed on the final model that the
> penultimate model belonged to. But it seemed to create all other
> tables up to that point.
>
> Do your tests test models with deep associations?
>
> Also, I have 6 failures in the Core tests for model.
>
> All model tests
>
>* Failed
>  Equal expectation fails with member [comments] with member
> [article_id] as key list [type, null, default] does not match key list
> [type, null] at
> [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php line 391]
>  ModelGroupTest ->
> /var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php ->
> CakeSchemaTest -> testSchemaRead
>* Failed
>  Identical expectation [Array: 4 items] fails with [Array: 3
> items] as key list [type, null, default, length] does not match key
> list [type, null, length] at
> [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php line 395]
>  ModelGroupTest ->
> /var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php ->
> CakeSchemaTest -> testSchemaRead
>* Failed
>  at 
> [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> line 110]
>  ModelGroupTest ->
> /var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> -> ContainableTest -> testContainments
>* Failed
>  at 
> [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> line 111]
>  ModelGroupTest ->
> /var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> -> ContainableTest -> testContainments
>* Failed
>  Equal expectation fails as key list [] does not match key list
> [0, 1] at 
> [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> line 112]
>  ModelGroupTest ->
> /var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> -> ContainableTest -> testContainments
>* Failed
>  Equal expectation fails as key list [] does not match key list
> [0] at 
> [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> line 113]
>  ModelGroupTest ->
> /var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
> -> ContainableTest -> testContainments
>
>
> Ed
>
>
> --
> Ed Howland
> http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/ed_howland
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-12 Thread Ed Howland 

Ok, currently (nightly build 12/12/2008) I am seeing the following.

First, I re-baked all models to get new fixtures and test cases.

1. Any leaf model w.o any associations works fine.
2. Any leaf model that has a has_many association, doesn't seem to
create that table.
3. Any model with a single depth belongs_to association works fine
4. Any model that belongs_to a model that belongs_to another model
doesn't create the furthest model in the chain.

I am not sure that final one is a consistent symptom. But I had a 4
way indirect chain and it bombed on the final model that the
penultimate model belonged to. But it seemed to create all other
tables up to that point.

Do your tests test models with deep associations?

Also, I have 6 failures in the Core tests for model.

All model tests

* Failed
  Equal expectation fails with member [comments] with member
[article_id] as key list [type, null, default] does not match key list
[type, null] at
[/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php line 391]
  ModelGroupTest ->
/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php ->
CakeSchemaTest -> testSchemaRead
* Failed
  Identical expectation [Array: 4 items] fails with [Array: 3
items] as key list [type, null, default, length] does not match key
list [type, null, length] at
[/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php line 395]
  ModelGroupTest ->
/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/schema.test.php ->
CakeSchemaTest -> testSchemaRead
* Failed
  at 
[/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
line 110]
  ModelGroupTest ->
/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
-> ContainableTest -> testContainments
* Failed
  at 
[/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
line 111]
  ModelGroupTest ->
/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
-> ContainableTest -> testContainments
* Failed
  Equal expectation fails as key list [] does not match key list
[0, 1] at 
[/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
line 112]
  ModelGroupTest ->
/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
-> ContainableTest -> testContainments
* Failed
  Equal expectation fails as key list [] does not match key list
[0] at [/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
line 113]
  ModelGroupTest ->
/var/www/xeon/cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php
-> ContainableTest -> testContainments


Ed


-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Tip: ignoring tmp dirs in Subversion

2008-12-12 Thread Ed Howland 

Also, what do you think about keeping the cake folder on a sep svn
repos and using svn:externals to link it into your app. In our case it
let us follow nightly builds w/o having
to do the rsync shuffle above.

Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-12 Thread Ed Howland 

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 10:55 pm, mark_story  wrote:
>> Should be fixed now! :)
>
> Indeed, it works again :)
>
> Thank you, Mark.
>
> Marcus
> >
>

I think my bake scripts created the old style test, with model = new
Model(). I'm going to try  the ClassRegistry.init route.

Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Tip: ignoring tmp dirs in Subversion

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:26 PM, brian  wrote:
>
> BTW, why would you not want to version-control core.php or database.php?

Well the site with the tip lays it out, but in my case, I am
developing on my laptop and we also have a server for all the devs to
work on. The DB's configs are quite different. Also, we keep core.php
(DEBUG=0) to be as close as possible to the final production env.

Ed
-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Tip: ignoring tmp dirs in Subversion

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:25 PM, brian  wrote:
>
> The contents of the .svn dirs  are modified by Subversion, so it
> wouldn't make sense to try to get it to ignore them. They're full of
> meta-info. .svn/text-base/ contains a clean copy of everything, for
> instance, and it's these files that are compared to your working copy
> in order to discern what's been changed.
>
> One can checkout an entire site without them (say, for uploading to
> production or tarring up an archive) by doing "svn export ..." Note
> that you'll want to export to somewhere other than your working
> directory.
>
> You can also copy a subversion working dir without the .svn dirs by
> using "rsync -C ..."

That last one is good for me too. I just checked out a latest HEAD and
wanted to overlay a working directory to check a bug fix in unit
tests. I did it by hand for each dir. That could have saved me some
time! (Hey universe, can I have those last 30 minutes back?)

Thanks for the tip.

Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:55 PM, mark_story  wrote:
>
> Should be fixed now! :)
>

On r7916:

Ok, I am getting a lot farther now. Before, no model tests were
passing. Now only two don't pass. Those two models belong_to other
models. E.g. User => Group. The error reports  that the group table is
missing, in that case.

Thanks for fixing the rest of them though.

Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Tip: ignoring tmp dirs in Subversion

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:35 PM, brian  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Ed Howland  wrote:
>>
>> Let me know if you have a different experience.
>>
>
> As Marcus said, it'll be a different experience if the repository is
> checked out on a *different machine*.
>
> Subversion has the capability to handle things like this, though one
> needs to set things up for it. Here's  a Cake-specific solution posted
> by Andy:
>
> http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/setting-svn-ignore-properties
>

Brian, thanks for the link. It's a good idea for the core.php and
database.php files as well. BTW, I did test my command and checked it
out on another machine and it still worked. Perhaps there is a
difference wrt versions of svn?

What I didn't know about was the -R (recursive) flag for svn propset.
I wanted to make sure that the '.svn' dirs were preserved and thus
excluded. But propset must do that already.

Ed
.


> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Tip: ignoring tmp dirs in Subversion

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Marcus  wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 6:40 pm, "Ed Howland"  wrote:
>> This always confused me.
>>
>> cd app
>> svn up
>> find tmp -type d | grep -v svn| xargs -L1 svn propset svn:ignore '*'
>> svn commit -m "ignoring app/tmp in subversion"
>
> This isn't a good solution: If you check out your project on another
> machine, the whole 'tmp' directory and its structure is missing.

It worked for me I did two commit+checkout round trips, and the tmp
structure was maintained. I did have to svn rm the old cache files,
but now svn st reports no changes. I think that works because the
pattern supplied was '*' and svn propset does not apply that to
directories.

Let me know if you have a different experience.

Ed


>
> Marcus
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Tip: ignoring tmp dirs in Subversion

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

This always confused me.

cd app
svn up
find tmp -type d | grep -v svn| xargs -L1 svn propset svn:ignore '*'
svn commit -m "ignoring app/tmp in subversion"

HTH someone
Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-11 Thread Ed Howland 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Same problem here. The error message "Database table not found"
> appeared with changeset 7870 of CakePHP.
>
So an earlier changeset might work for me?

> When calling ClassRegistry::init('Foo') in the startTest method of a
> test case, Cake tries to set up 'Foo' with all the associated models
> and fails when initializing the first related model: CakePHP reads the
> schema definition from database with wrong connection.
>

> When calling ClassRegistry::init('Foo'), Cake uses the 'default'
> connection for getting the schema for 'Foo' and everything works fine.
> Then the first related Model is initialized, CakePHP tries to read the
> schema, but now with the 'test_suite' connection, which raises the
> error because the table doesn't exist in the test database.
>

I poked around some more and I think I am seeing the same thing.

> Is this an error that should be filed to trac?
>
Nothing open in trac at the moment. perhaps a closed
> Marcus

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:22 AM, mark_story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How are your fixtures setup?
var $fixtures = array('app.form', 'app.program');

> Are you using imports?
App::import('Model', 'Form');

> Are you initializing your models in setup() or startTest()?
function start() {
parent::start();
$this->Form = new TestForm();
}

> Are you using ClassRegistry::init() or are you use new Model()?
Tried both. But it came with new Model();

It seems like a DB connection issue, as Marcus said. I wonder if it
work with models with no associations.

Ed
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Example working app w/tests

2008-12-10 Thread Ed Howland 

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:36 PM, websta*
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have you had a look at the core tests, recommend them as a good place to
> start.

Yes, I did run the core apps and they are broken the same way. That is
why I wanted a reference app to compare against. I cheked a fair
number of apps in cakeforge and only ine of them had any tests, but
they were all jyst stubs and used an older version of the test suite,

I need a recent RC3 if possible app with working tests.

Thanks
Ed

>
> -Original Message-
> From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Ed Howland
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:26 AM
> To: cake-php@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Example working app w/tests
>
>
> Hey does anyone have a sample app that works in RC3 with Unit tests?
> Or know where one can be found?
>
> Thanks
> Ed
>
> --
> Ed Howland
> http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/ed_howland
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1842 - Release Date: 12/10/2008
> 6:53 PM
>
>
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Example working app w/tests

2008-12-10 Thread Ed Howland 

Hey does anyone have a sample app that works in RC3 with Unit tests?
Or know where one can be found?

Thanks
Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Getting simpletest to work with test DB

2008-12-10 Thread Ed Howland 

Hi,

I've got simpletest installed but now I am having problems with the test DB.

I had to change the name of the variable to $test_suite from $test.
After that I could see the create table statements.

Here is my setup:

var $test_suite = array(
'driver' => 'mysql',
'persistent' => false,
'host' => 'localhost',
'login' => 'eddie',
'password' => 'eddie',
'database' => 'bph_test',
'prefix' => '',
);

But now every test reports
Error:  Database table forms for model Form was not found. The rest of
the test aborts.

Any idea what I am doing wrong?

Thanks,
Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Noob help with migrations add/drop coluumns

2008-12-08 Thread Ed Howland 

Hi, when trying to add or drop a column (really I want to rename it), and I run

cake schema run update -4

it says
Comparing Database to Schema...
Schema is up to date.

Anyone have any idea what is going on? I want to rename a column in
users from 'login; to 'username'. I am writing a presentation on Cake
and don't (necessarily want to use any plugins or custom code.)

Thanks
Ed
-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: How can I view the screencasts on Linux

2008-12-08 Thread Ed Howland 

> If you can't get the videos to play in your browser,look at the HTML
> source, search for the .mov files and play them with your favorite player.
>

I copied the url of the .mov into by browser's address bar and it
played fine. They are doing some weird Javascript (I guess to play in
the little window).  I might try to debug it with Firebug later,

However, at the moment the cakephp.org servers seem to be down (again)!

Thanks
Ed
-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: How can I view the screencasts on Linux

2008-12-07 Thread Ed Howland 

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Marcelo Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Ed Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am having trouble playing the screencasts on the cakephp.org site. I
>> am using Ubuntu 8.10 w/FF.
>>
>> Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
> What kind of problems?

It just says video loading and then quits. Do you know what kind of
video format it is?

Thanks
Ed

>
> --
> MARCELO DE F. ANDRADE (aka "eleKtron")
> Belem, PA, Amazonia, Brazil
> Linux User #221105
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# links http://pa.slackwarebrasil.org/
>
> For Libby's backstory be told onLost
> http://www.petitiononline.com/libby423/petition.html
>
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

How can I view the screencasts on Linux

2008-12-07 Thread Ed Howland 

I am having trouble playing the screencasts on the cakephp.org site. I
am using Ubuntu 8.10 w/FF.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks
Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Can/Should I use 1.2RC3 in a production environment

2008-12-07 Thread Ed Howland 

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:09 PM, aranworld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the last 6 months or so, most of the changes made to the 1.2 core
> code have been with regards to test coverage.  Very little (if any) of
> the most commonly used API has changed, and I think the developers
> have been pretty clear that not much will change either.  For the most
> part, websites I put together in March 2008 still function perfectly
> fine with the latest version of the core code.
>
> Upgrading from 1.1 to 1.2, however, does require a bit of work,

Since this project is Greenfield, it shouldn't be a problem. All I
have now is the login page, home page and various user add,edit, list
stuff. Did note the file extension changed from .thtml to .ctp.

> because of the changes made to the way the HTML helper forms work.
> Also, so many more people are focused on 1.2, that if there are any
> major vulnerabilities or performance problems discovered, they will be
> found quickly making its use relatively safe from a project management
> standpoint.
>

Also most of the on-line discussion seems to assume 1.2. With the
release being nearly 2 years old, I;d say it is mature enough for our
use. After all I'm writing this on GMail(beta)!

Thanks
Ed

-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Can/Should I use 1.2RC3 in a production environment

2008-12-07 Thread Ed Howland 

Thanks to all.

That gives me comfort esp. wrt to unit testing.

Ed

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:02 PM, lightglitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Despite being in RC3 I already use it in some productions projects
> without
> any problems. It may have some bugs in some features but the main 1.2
> core
> is stable enough to start development.
>
> And 1.2 is a big evolution over 1.1 version.
>
>
> On Dec 7, 5:59 pm, "Ed Howland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> HI, cake noob here. I know 1.2 isn't stable yet, but does anyone have
>> any experience or advice wrt usin 1.2RC3 in a production environment?
>> We are migrating a Perl CGI project over to Cake and first decided to
>> use 1.1 because of the stable tag on it.
>>
>> But if 1.2 is going stable in January/early '09, should we develop on
>> it? I only want to do TDD work and have read that using Simpletest in
>> 1.1 is problematic.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ed
> >
>



-- 
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/ed_howland

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Can/Should I use 1.2RC3 in a production environment

2008-12-07 Thread Ed Howland 

HI, cake noob here. I know 1.2 isn't stable yet, but does anyone have
any experience or advice wrt usin 1.2RC3 in a production environment?
We are migrating a Perl CGI project over to Cake and first decided to
use 1.1 because of the stable tag on it.

But if 1.2 is going stable in January/early '09, should we develop on
it? I only want to do TDD work and have read that using Simpletest in
1.1 is problematic.

Thanks
Ed

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---