Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP SRST does not work

2011-03-28 Thread Randall Saborío Cubero
Looks like the calls are going through dial-peer 9 as soon a you hit the
1. What do you have on that dial-peer ?

Another option would be to configure SIP dial rules so the phone will
wait to get all 4 digits before sending the invite to CME.

El lun, 28-03-2011 a las 20:11 +0200, Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
escribió:
> Hi all,
> 
>  
> 
> I have problems with SIP SRST. The SIP phone registers ok in SRST
> mode, but I can’t make or receive any type of calls (internal or
> external).
> 
>  
> 
> Analyzing Internal calls I’ve seen that when PhoneA (1001) dials Phone
> B (1002). Only the first number of the called number is sent. The
> debug ccsip messages shows the first invite with the 1 but there are
> not any notify messages for kpml with all the other digits
> 
>  
> 
> Have you found any problem with SRST? Is there anything I am missing
> in the config?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> voice service voip 
> 
>  allow-connections h323 to sip
> 
>  allow-connections sip to h323
> 
>  allow-connections sip to sip
> 
>  sip
> 
>   bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.240
> 
>   bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.240
> 
>   registrar server
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> voice register global
> 
>  system message SRST
> 
>  max-dn 4
> 
>  max-pool 4
> 
>  !
> 
> voice register pool  1
> 
>  id network 192.168.21.0 mask 255.255.255.0
> 
>  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
> 
>  codec g711ulaw
> 
>  
> 
> BRANCH1#sh voice register dial-peers 
> 
> dial-peer voice 40001 voip
> 
>  destination-pattern 1002
> 
>  redirect ip2ip
> 
>  session target ipv4:192.168.21.69:5060
> 
>  session protocol sipv2
> 
>  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
> 
>  digit collect kpml
> 
>  codec  g711ulaw bytes 160
> 
>   after-hours-exempt   FALSE  
> 
>  
> 
> dial-peer voice 40002 voip
> 
>  destination-pattern 1001
> 
>  redirect ip2ip
> 
>  session target ipv4:192.168.21.68:5060
> 
>  session protocol sipv2
> 
>  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
> 
>  digit collect kpml
> 
>  codec  g711ulaw bytes 160
> 
>   after-hours-exempt   FALSE   
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> BRANCH1#
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
> 
>Calling Number=1, Called Number=1, Peer Info
> Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
> 
>Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=1
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
> 
>Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_DEST
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
> 
>Result=SUCCESS(0) 
> 
>List of Matched Outgoing Dial-peer(s): 
> 
>  1: Dial-peer Tag=9
> 
> *Mar 28
> 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
> 
>Calling Number=1001, Called Number=, Voice-Interface=0x0,
> 
>Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search
> Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
> 
>Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
> 
> *Mar 28
> 18:58:38.216: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
> 
>Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming
> Dial-peer=40002
> 
> *Mar 28
> 18:58:38.220: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
> 
>Calling Number=1001, Called Number=, Voice-Interface=0x0,
> 
>Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search
> Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
> 
>Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
> 
> *Mar 28
> 18:58:38.220: //-1//DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
> 
>Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming
> Dial-peer=40002
> 
> *Mar 28
> 18:58:38.220: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
> 
>Calling Number=1001, Called Number=1, Voice-Interface=0x0,
> 
>Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search
> Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE,
> 
>Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
> 
> *Mar 28
> 18:58:38.220: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore:
> 
>Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_ORIGINATE; Incoming
> Dial-peer=40002
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
> 
>Calling Number=, Called Number=1, Peer Info
> Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
> 
>Match Rule=DP_MATCH_DEST; Called Number=1
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersCore:
> 
>Result=Partial Matches(1) after DP_MATCH_DEST
> 
> *Mar 28 18:58:38.228: //-1/3968292780B0/DPM/dpMatchPeersMoreArg:
> 
>Result=MORE_DIGITS_NEEDED(1)
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Francesc Xavier Roig Borrell
> 
> Network Senior Consultant
> 
> Integración de Sistemas y Tecnología
> 
> C/Santander, 49-51
> 
> Barcelona 08020
> 
> Tel. Fijo: (+34) 934965108 ext 64697
> 
> Tel. Móvil / Fax: (+34) 647 32 21 55 (24697) / (+34) 934965161 
> 
> email: francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es
> 
> http://www.tecnocom.es
> 
>  
> 
> Por favor, antes de imprimir este mensaje, asegúrate de que es
> necesario. Ayudemos a cuidar el medio ambiente
> 
> Este mensaje puede con

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to configure cucme to support phoneview

2011-03-28 Thread bruno
hello guys,
  
 great news Unified FX release their lab version. how to configure cucme to 
support phoneview?  i can not find any tutorial on their website. could someone 
help?
  
 Best Regards,
 bruno___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] A 2nd Corporate Directory

2011-03-28 Thread Bo Gao
Hi all,

Is it possible to set up a Secondary corporate directory as an IP Phone
service that coexist with the primary corporate directory in CUCM 7 or CUCM
8?

Thank you,


Bo
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state "TCP_CONN_ERROR"

2011-03-28 Thread Prashant Patel
Hi Rahul,

I have seen this before and the solution was a router reboot.

HTH
Prashant

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Rahul Kapor wrote:

>
> Hi all ,
>
> I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is
> stuck in "TCP_CONN_ERROR" error state.
>
> sh sccp
> Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
> Active Call Manager: NONE
> TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
> Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
> ...
> ...
>
> reloaded the router but did not help!
>
> Please suggest.
>
> Thx,
> Rahul
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge in SRST nt working !

2011-03-28 Thread Bo Gao
Hi,

You might want to add ephone type under the ephone.

Hope it helps,


Bo

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Rahul Kapor wrote:

> Hi all ,
>
> Cbarge in SRST not working
>
> here is my config
>
> ephone-dn-template  1
>  call-forward busy 914082026002
>  call-forward noan 914082026002 timeout 3
> ephone-template  1
>  softkeys idle  Redial Newcall Cfwdall
> ephone-dn  10  octo-line
>  number 
>  conference ad-hoc
> ephone  1
>  privacy off
>  device-security-mode none
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>  device-security-mode none
>
> telephony-service
>  sdspfarm units 1
>  sdspfarm tag 1 HQ-CONF
>  no privacy
>  conference hardware
>  srst mode auto-provision none
>  srst ephone template 1
>  srst dn template 1
>  srst dn line-mode octo
>  max-ephones 15
>  max-dn 15
>  ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
>  system message you are in fallback
>  voicemail 914082026002
>  max-conferences 12 gain -6
>  moh music-on-hold.au
>  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 1.1.1.1 14.160.116.40
>  transfer-system full-consult
>  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 27 2011 01:04:02
>
> Phones gets registered to SRST and shared line is seen on phone display.
> i created octo dn for conf and conf bridge is registered to SRST.
>
> Please let me know if i am missing any thing.
>
> thx,
> Rahul
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state "TCP_CONN_ERROR"

2011-03-28 Thread chase mergenthal

What is in your "telephony-service" section of your config?


 -Chase



Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:27:30 +0530
From: rahul.kapo...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state   
"TCP_CONN_ERROR"


Hi all ,

I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is stuck in 
"TCP_CONN_ERROR" error state.

sh sccp
Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR

Active Call Manager: NONE
TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
...
...

reloaded the router but did not help!

Please suggest.


Thx,
Rahul


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state "TCP_CONN_ERROR"

2011-03-28 Thread Hough, Earl
Is this for integration with UCM or CME?  If CME, what version did you specify?

Earl Hough
CCIE #16508 (R&S/Security/Voice)

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Rahul Kapor
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 11:58 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state 
"TCP_CONN_ERROR"


Hi all ,

I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is stuck in 
"TCP_CONN_ERROR" error state.

sh sccp
Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
Active Call Manager: NONE
TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
...
...

reloaded the router but did not help!

Please suggest.

Thx,
Rahul
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to
whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is
not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for
the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this
communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge in SRST nt working !

2011-03-28 Thread CCIE Voice
Rahul:

You may need a 'no huntstop' under your ephone-dn 10

Example:
ephone-dn  5  octo-linec
number 4300 no-reg primary
conference ad-hoc
no huntstop


If that does not work do a 'sh sccp' and post that output.


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Rahul Kapor wrote:

> Hi all ,
>
> Cbarge in SRST not working
>
> here is my config
>
> ephone-dn-template  1
>  call-forward busy 914082026002
>  call-forward noan 914082026002 timeout 3
> ephone-template  1
>  softkeys idle  Redial Newcall Cfwdall
> ephone-dn  10  octo-line
>  number 
>  conference ad-hoc
> ephone  1
>  privacy off
>  device-security-mode none
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>  device-security-mode none
>
> telephony-service
>  sdspfarm units 1
>  sdspfarm tag 1 HQ-CONF
>  no privacy
>  conference hardware
>  srst mode auto-provision none
>  srst ephone template 1
>  srst dn template 1
>  srst dn line-mode octo
>  max-ephones 15
>  max-dn 15
>  ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
>  system message you are in fallback
>  voicemail 914082026002
>  max-conferences 12 gain -6
>  moh music-on-hold.au
>  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 1.1.1.1 14.160.116.40
>  transfer-system full-consult
>  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 27 2011 01:04:02
>
> Phones gets registered to SRST and shared line is seen on phone display.
> i created octo dn for conf and conf bridge is registered to SRST.
>
> Please let me know if i am missing any thing.
>
> thx,
> Rahul
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge in SRST nt working !

2011-03-28 Thread Rahul Kapor
Hi all ,

Cbarge in SRST not working

here is my config

ephone-dn-template  1
 call-forward busy 914082026002
 call-forward noan 914082026002 timeout 3
ephone-template  1
 softkeys idle  Redial Newcall Cfwdall
ephone-dn  10  octo-line
 number 
 conference ad-hoc
ephone  1
 privacy off
 device-security-mode none
ephone  2
 privacy off
 device-security-mode none

telephony-service
 sdspfarm units 1
 sdspfarm tag 1 HQ-CONF
 no privacy
 conference hardware
 srst mode auto-provision none
 srst ephone template 1
 srst dn template 1
 srst dn line-mode octo
 max-ephones 15
 max-dn 15
 ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
 system message you are in fallback
 voicemail 914082026002
 max-conferences 12 gain -6
 moh music-on-hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 1.1.1.1 14.160.116.40
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 27 2011 01:04:02

Phones gets registered to SRST and shared line is seen on phone display.
i created octo dn for conf and conf bridge is registered to SRST.

Please let me know if i am missing any thing.

thx,
Rahul
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware conference is stuck in state "TCP_CONN_ERROR"

2011-03-28 Thread Rahul Kapor
Hi all ,

I am trying to register my hardware conference to cucm/cme   but it is stuck
in "TCP_CONN_ERROR" error state.

sh sccp
Conferencing Oper State: ACTIVE_IN_PROGRESS - Cause Code: TCP_CONN_ERROR
Active Call Manager: NONE
TCP Link Status: CONNECT_PENDING, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
...
...

reloaded the router but did not help!

Please suggest.

Thx,
Rahul
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast MoH to CUBE

2011-03-28 Thread Brian Mulgrew
Hi Alex - see this  excellent post from Shingei re Multicast outwith cucm
cluster

http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-March/073393.html

Your unicast issue sounds as if it may be codec / xcoder related.

hth
Brian


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alex Goh  wrote:

> Anyone can enlighten me?
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Alex Goh  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > When trying to practice some MoH lab today, I notice that whenever
> > HQ/BR1 phone make a call
> > to BR2 Phone via H323 gateway, which BR2 setup as CME
> > (telephony-service), when HQ/BR1 phone press hold,
> > the MoH will not work (BR2 phone hear silence). But when BR2 phone
> > press Hold, HQ/BR1 phone can hear MoH.
> >
> > Same for when HQ/BR1 tried to send call out to PSTN via the H323
> > gateway, the PSTN hear no MoH.
> > BR2 Phone call PSTN the MoH is ok though.
> >
> > My HQ is set to send Unicast MoH, while BR1 is set to send Multicast
> > MoH. MoH servers have different DP
> > and Region to all site is g711.
> >
> > I did tried to turn the BR2 into a H323 gateway only (no CUBE) and
> > configured the following commands:
> > ccm-manager music-on-hold,
> > moh music-on-hold.au
> > multicast moh 239.1.1.5 port 16384
> >
> > Then MoH is working fine when HQ/BR1 put the call to PSTN on hold via
> > the H323 gateway, also when
> > HQ/BR1 calling BR2 Phone which on different DP/Region, MoH is working
> > fine for both direction.
> >
> > Is this normal that Multicast MoH or Unicast MoH is not supporting
> > CUBE in this case?
> > also, why is BR2 CME phone calling HQ/BR1 phone yet MoH is working fine?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB II, Lab 10, Calling Party Localization

2011-03-28 Thread George Goglidze
Hi Adam,

Just a question, which vRack are you using? I was on rack 15, maybe that one
in particular has some problem?


On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, adam compton  wrote:

> I was just trying to help.  Worked for me no problem
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:44 AM, George Goglidze wrote:
>
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> I would really think that if I had that things that you mentioned not
>> configured correctly, then even if I stopped Subscriber Call Manager
>> service, it wouldn't have worked correctly once all registered to
>> Publisher... config error but it does as I mentioned in my e-mails.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:51 AM, adam compton  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm actually doing that lab right now :)
>>>
>>> Make sure that "use device pool calling transformation css" is not
>>> checked and assign the css to the phone.  Reboot the phone.  Might require a
>>> no mgcp and mgcp on the gateways.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, George Goglidze wrote:
>>>
 Hi Roger,

 I checked the replication on a cli on both, PUB/SUB:
  admin:show perf query class "Number of Replicates Created and State of
 Replication"
 ==>query class :

  - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication)
 has instances and values:
 ReplicateCount  -> Number of Replicates Created   = 412
 ReplicateCount  -> Replicate_State= 2


 I know the config is correct, because if I stop Call manager service on
 the Sub, or remove it from the Call Manager group, everything works fine...
  So it has to be good.

 I don't want to loose much time with this, as I'm with proctorlabs
 online rack rental, so I refer to finish the lab.
 at the end if I finish it much earlier, then I might do it, and reset
 the replication between sub/pub.

 Thanks for anwering Roger!

 Cheers,

 On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Roger Carpio 
 wrote:

> Hello George,
>
> Very rarely I've seen replication status 2 and weird behaviors happen.
> Have you checked replication anywhere else? CLI / Unified Reporting?
>
> If you've done this many times and you're sure the configuration has
> been done correctly; drop this replication and reset it "cluster wide". I
> hope it helps.
>
> Regards,
> Roger Carpio.
>
>   On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze  > wrote:
>
>>  Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has seen this before.
>>
>> There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in
>> E164 format, but in alerting/connected state it should be localized for
>> user.
>> Subscriber to 7digit, national to 10digit, international to 011
>>
>> I have configured correct prefixes on the incoming gateways, so
>> Missed/Received directory is fine! It shows correct values with the +sign
>> E164 format.
>>
>> And I have configured pt-norm-hq-ani, pt-norm-br1-ani,
>> pt-norm-br2-ani, which are in their corresponding css-norm-hq-ani,
>> css-norm-br1-ani, css-norm-br2-ani
>> and I've applied them to the corresponding Device Pools, in "Calling
>> Party Transformation CSS".
>>
>> But when the call comes in, I still get in alerting/connected state
>> E164 format.
>>
>> All my devices phones and gateways are registered to Sub first, and in
>> failed to Publisher.
>>
>> If I change this and I register all the devices to the Publisher,
>> instead of a subscriber, changing it in Callmanager group configuration,
>> then it all works as expected.
>> Therefore I thought maybe Sub is not replicating correctly, but I've
>> checked and the replication Status is 2! which means it's replicating 
>> fine.
>> I have even restarted the Subscriber but it didn't fix the issue.
>>
>> I am out of ideas, and I've done it many times in prior Labs, and it
>> has always worked fine!
>> I've searched through CCM Service Parameters, and couldn't find
>> anything that could affect this behaviour.
>>
>> If anyone has seen this, please let me know...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com


>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multicast MoH to CUBE

2011-03-28 Thread Alex Goh
Anyone can enlighten me?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Alex Goh  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When trying to practice some MoH lab today, I notice that whenever
> HQ/BR1 phone make a call
> to BR2 Phone via H323 gateway, which BR2 setup as CME
> (telephony-service), when HQ/BR1 phone press hold,
> the MoH will not work (BR2 phone hear silence). But when BR2 phone
> press Hold, HQ/BR1 phone can hear MoH.
>
> Same for when HQ/BR1 tried to send call out to PSTN via the H323
> gateway, the PSTN hear no MoH.
> BR2 Phone call PSTN the MoH is ok though.
>
> My HQ is set to send Unicast MoH, while BR1 is set to send Multicast
> MoH. MoH servers have different DP
> and Region to all site is g711.
>
> I did tried to turn the BR2 into a H323 gateway only (no CUBE) and
> configured the following commands:
> ccm-manager music-on-hold,
> moh music-on-hold.au
> multicast moh 239.1.1.5 port 16384
>
> Then MoH is working fine when HQ/BR1 put the call to PSTN on hold via
> the H323 gateway, also when
> HQ/BR1 calling BR2 Phone which on different DP/Region, MoH is working
> fine for both direction.
>
> Is this normal that Multicast MoH or Unicast MoH is not supporting
> CUBE in this case?
> also, why is BR2 CME phone calling HQ/BR1 phone yet MoH is working fine?
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB II, Lab 10, Calling Party Localization

2011-03-28 Thread adam compton
I was just trying to help.  Worked for me no problem

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:44 AM, George Goglidze  wrote:

> Hi Adam,
>
> I would really think that if I had that things that you mentioned not
> configured correctly, then even if I stopped Subscriber Call Manager
> service, it wouldn't have worked correctly once all registered to
> Publisher... config error but it does as I mentioned in my e-mails.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:51 AM, adam compton  wrote:
>
>> I'm actually doing that lab right now :)
>>
>> Make sure that "use device pool calling transformation css" is not checked
>> and assign the css to the phone.  Reboot the phone.  Might require a no mgcp
>> and mgcp on the gateways.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, George Goglidze wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> I checked the replication on a cli on both, PUB/SUB:
>>>  admin:show perf query class "Number of Replicates Created and State of
>>> Replication"
>>> ==>query class :
>>>
>>>  - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has
>>> instances and values:
>>> ReplicateCount  -> Number of Replicates Created   = 412
>>> ReplicateCount  -> Replicate_State= 2
>>>
>>>
>>> I know the config is correct, because if I stop Call manager service on
>>> the Sub, or remove it from the Call Manager group, everything works fine...
>>>  So it has to be good.
>>>
>>> I don't want to loose much time with this, as I'm with proctorlabs online
>>> rack rental, so I refer to finish the lab.
>>> at the end if I finish it much earlier, then I might do it, and reset the
>>> replication between sub/pub.
>>>
>>> Thanks for anwering Roger!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Roger Carpio wrote:
>>>
 Hello George,

 Very rarely I've seen replication status 2 and weird behaviors happen.
 Have you checked replication anywhere else? CLI / Unified Reporting?

 If you've done this many times and you're sure the configuration has
 been done correctly; drop this replication and reset it "cluster wide". I
 hope it helps.

 Regards,
 Roger Carpio.

   On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze 
 wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has seen this before.
>
> There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in
> E164 format, but in alerting/connected state it should be localized for
> user.
> Subscriber to 7digit, national to 10digit, international to 011
>
> I have configured correct prefixes on the incoming gateways, so
> Missed/Received directory is fine! It shows correct values with the +sign
> E164 format.
>
> And I have configured pt-norm-hq-ani, pt-norm-br1-ani, pt-norm-br2-ani,
> which are in their corresponding css-norm-hq-ani, css-norm-br1-ani,
> css-norm-br2-ani
> and I've applied them to the corresponding Device Pools, in "Calling
> Party Transformation CSS".
>
> But when the call comes in, I still get in alerting/connected state
> E164 format.
>
> All my devices phones and gateways are registered to Sub first, and in
> failed to Publisher.
>
> If I change this and I register all the devices to the Publisher,
> instead of a subscriber, changing it in Callmanager group configuration,
> then it all works as expected.
> Therefore I thought maybe Sub is not replicating correctly, but I've
> checked and the replication Status is 2! which means it's replicating 
> fine.
> I have even restarted the Subscriber but it didn't fix the issue.
>
> I am out of ideas, and I've done it many times in prior Labs, and it
> has always worked fine!
> I've searched through CCM Service Parameters, and couldn't find
> anything that could affect this behaviour.
>
> If anyone has seen this, please let me know...
>
> Regards,
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>

>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB II, Lab 10, Calling Party Localization

2011-03-28 Thread George Goglidze
Hi Adam,

I would really think that if I had that things that you mentioned not
configured correctly, then even if I stopped Subscriber Call Manager
service, it wouldn't have worked correctly once all registered to
Publisher... config error but it does as I mentioned in my e-mails.

Thanks,

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:51 AM, adam compton  wrote:

> I'm actually doing that lab right now :)
>
> Make sure that "use device pool calling transformation css" is not checked
> and assign the css to the phone.  Reboot the phone.  Might require a no mgcp
> and mgcp on the gateways.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, George Goglidze wrote:
>
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> I checked the replication on a cli on both, PUB/SUB:
>> admin:show perf query class "Number of Replicates Created and State of
>> Replication"
>> ==>query class :
>>
>>  - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has
>> instances and values:
>> ReplicateCount  -> Number of Replicates Created   = 412
>> ReplicateCount  -> Replicate_State= 2
>>
>>
>> I know the config is correct, because if I stop Call manager service on
>> the Sub, or remove it from the Call Manager group, everything works fine...
>>  So it has to be good.
>>
>> I don't want to loose much time with this, as I'm with proctorlabs online
>> rack rental, so I refer to finish the lab.
>> at the end if I finish it much earlier, then I might do it, and reset the
>> replication between sub/pub.
>>
>> Thanks for anwering Roger!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Roger Carpio wrote:
>>
>>> Hello George,
>>>
>>> Very rarely I've seen replication status 2 and weird behaviors happen.
>>> Have you checked replication anywhere else? CLI / Unified Reporting?
>>>
>>> If you've done this many times and you're sure the configuration has been
>>> done correctly; drop this replication and reset it "cluster wide". I hope it
>>> helps.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Roger Carpio.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I was wondering if anyone has seen this before.

 There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in
 E164 format, but in alerting/connected state it should be localized for
 user.
 Subscriber to 7digit, national to 10digit, international to 011

 I have configured correct prefixes on the incoming gateways, so
 Missed/Received directory is fine! It shows correct values with the +sign
 E164 format.

 And I have configured pt-norm-hq-ani, pt-norm-br1-ani, pt-norm-br2-ani,
 which are in their corresponding css-norm-hq-ani, css-norm-br1-ani,
 css-norm-br2-ani
 and I've applied them to the corresponding Device Pools, in "Calling
 Party Transformation CSS".

 But when the call comes in, I still get in alerting/connected state E164
 format.

 All my devices phones and gateways are registered to Sub first, and in
 failed to Publisher.

 If I change this and I register all the devices to the Publisher,
 instead of a subscriber, changing it in Callmanager group configuration,
 then it all works as expected.
 Therefore I thought maybe Sub is not replicating correctly, but I've
 checked and the replication Status is 2! which means it's replicating fine.
 I have even restarted the Subscriber but it didn't fix the issue.

 I am out of ideas, and I've done it many times in prior Labs, and it has
 always worked fine!
 I've searched through CCM Service Parameters, and couldn't find anything
 that could affect this behaviour.

 If anyone has seen this, please let me know...

 Regards,

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com


>>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voiceview error

2011-03-28 Thread George Goglidze
did you assign the phone to jtapi user?



On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Erwan Erwan  wrote:

> hi all,
>
> When I press the Voiceview  "Listen"  , it said :Unknown Error ,report to
> System Administrator "
>
> all other Voiceview work fine, wondering what i miss here?
>
> tks
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA using sip trunk

2011-03-28 Thread Stanislav Braichuk
Just uncheck Redirection Header Delivery at SIP trunk configuration

27.03.2011 23:08 пользователь "Erwan Erwan"  написал:
> no just play around w sip trunk
>
> --- On Sun, 3/27/11, mihal caro  wrote:
>
>
> From: mihal caro 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA using sip trunk
> To: "Erwan Erwan" 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Received: Sunday, March 27, 2011, 6:14 PM
>
>
> hi there
>
> I had the same problem
>
> SIp trunk MVA is support on CUCM 7.13 . If is for the CCIE lab you need to
configure it as H323.
>
>
> regards.
>
>
> On 27 March 2011 07:24, Erwan Erwan  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> hi all,
>
> I tried to config MVA in  HQ site,
>
> Scenario
> -
>  I dial in  from PSTN to  5999 (MVA #)
>
> it gave me prompt for pin and press "1" to dial  any outside number (911)
>
> 1. If I use SIP trunk It will gave me error saying (below is the complete
"debug ccsip message"
>
>  "Sent:
> SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing Contact field' "
>
> 2. However if I use, H323 GW , call out  by MVA  to outside (ie :911 )
work fine
>
> Question
> -
> - wondering any parameter in SIP\ trunk I need to check ?
>
> tks in adv
>
>
>
> Complete debug
> ===
> PSTN-WAN#
> Mar 27 06:07:26.026: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Sent:
> SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing Contact field'
> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.210.10:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1861aabffa
> From: ;tag=ad370c0e-63ed-49fa-adb9-1bd65232089c-20651851
> To: ;tag=1343344-12F6
> Call-ID: 7bcce880-d8e1d41e-10-ad20a0a@10.10.210.10
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Reason: Q.850;cause=100
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com