[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0675 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 perl-Net-DNS - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0675 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0675.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: perl-Net-DNS-0.48-2.el4.i386.rpm src: perl-Net-DNS-0.48-2.el4.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0675 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 perl-Net-DNS - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0675 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0675.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: perl-Net-DNS-0.48-2.el4.x86_64.rpm src: perl-Net-DNS-0.48-2.el4.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0519 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 xorg-x11 - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0519 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0519.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-doc-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-font-utils-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-sdk-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-tools-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-twm-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-xauth-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-xdm-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Xdmx-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-xfs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Xnest-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm xorg-x11-Xvfb-6.8.2-1.EL.19.x86_64.rpm src: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.19.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0519 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 xorg-x11 - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0519 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0519.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-doc-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-font-utils-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-sdk-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-tools-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-twm-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-xauth-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-xdm-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Xdmx-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-xfs-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Xnest-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm xorg-x11-Xvfb-6.8.2-1.EL.19.i386.rpm src: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.19.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest... Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:0662 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) httpd - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:01:53 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0662 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) httpd - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0662 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0662.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-68.ent.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-68.ent.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-68.ent.centos.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-68.ent.centos.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-68.ent.centos.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-68.ent.centos.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070713/613614fa/attachment-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 6 ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Live CD root password
Mogens Kjaer wrote: Tom Diehl wrote: ... Could it be posted somewhere more prominent? Or removed in the next release? Mogens The next release will be a LiveCD based on the Fedora LiveCD project ... and will behave similarly to the Fedora7 liveCD. It should not have a passwd for root. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Strange C programming problem
I've got this little program I wrote to test something, and it keeps
giving the wrong result. I'm not inexperienced in C, but I can't believe
strtof (et al) are broken, so I must be doing something wrong. However,
I've spent hours looking at this and comparing it to the man pages and
don't see what I'm doing wrong. strtod() and strtold() also give equally
wrong results. (the example program given on the strotd man page works
fine, BTW.)
Can someone wield a clue-bat please? :)
Here's the program:
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
#include stdlib.h
#include errno.h
int main (int argc, char ** argv)
{
float ldbl = 0.0;
char * endp;
printf (%s\n, argv[1]);
errno = 0;
ldbl = strtof (argv[1], endp);
if (errno != 0)
printf (strtof failed! errno=%d\n, errno);
printf (%f\n, (double) ldbl);
printf (%f\n, (double) strtof (argv[1], (char **)NULL));
printf (%f\n, (double) atof (argv[1]));
return 0;
}
Compile it with:
cc -O0 -g -o x4 x4.c
then run it like this:
./x4 2.5
and I'd EXPECT it to produce this output:
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
but it actually produces this:
2.5
1075838976.00
1075838976.00
2.50
the typecase of the arg in the 3 printf calls makes no difference. Remove
it and the results are the same.
Using an input of something other than 2.5 changes the middle two lines in
some way in which I haven't yet discerned a pattern, but the result is still
highly bogus.
Thanks!
--
Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father,
Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He
will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding
it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever.
--- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) --
pgpC0Og3135im.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Migrating from ancient Fedora (was Fedora Core 5 EOL on 2007-06-29)
Kenneth Porter wrote: On Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:02 PM -0700 Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahem, I know this is a CentOS mailing list. BUT, as more and more people migrate from FC to CentOS, I thought placing this reminder here was worthwhile. [I am still running *cough* FC5 on my own desktop, so I am also running out of time] For those of us migrating from ancient versions of Fedora, what gotchas might one expect? If you are using php, you may need to look at programs to make sure they run on newer versions of PHP and upgrade if required (horde needs to be greater than a certain level to run on php-5, for example) I'm working on migrating from a pre-SELinux Fedora, and SELinux has been the biggest headache so far. I'm also expecting to migrate Dovecot from 0.99 to 1.0, and there's a page on the Dovecot wiki about that. I've seen the recent list traffic about BIND's lack of default config, so I'm expecting that, and it's not a problem. WRT SELinux ... these are your friends: chcon -R system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_script_exec_t path (lets apache run cgi scripts in directories not in /var/www/cgi-bin) chcon -R -t httpd_sys_content_t path (lets apache access directories outside /var/www/) many more SELINUX things from here: man httpd_selinux and here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/selg-overview.html If you are dealing with apache and a modified httpd.conf file ... the first thing I recommend is that you use /etc/httpd/conf.d/ and a conf file for as many things as possible. Also, to use a different conf file for each kind of service/site within conf.d/ This keeps your httpd.conf file as close to standard as possible, and allows you to easily upgrade to new versions where module names are different, etc. It also allows you to move services/sites over and troubleshoot issues much more easily than a full migration of everything. One thing I like to do is keep a non modified copy of httpd.conf from the original RPM ... and run a diff between the standard and my httpd.conf ... I then know what was changed on that machine ... and can either roll it into the new httpd on the new machine, or split it out to a conf.d/file.conf file. If you did not save the httpd.conf file from your current httpd-version.rpm ... you can get it using cpio2rpm like this: 1. get a copy of the original RPM (should be available on a Fedora, RedHat, CentOS, SciLinux, WBWL etc. mirror site that you installed it from) 2. Create a directory and put the RPM in there. 3. CD to the new directory an make sure the only file in there is the RPM. 4. Use this command to extract all the files from that RPM to the current directory: rpm2cpio rpm_name | cpio -idv 5. All the files are now in the current directory in the path that they would have been installed ... so this is the original config file: current_directory/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf My plan is to install CentOS to a new box, and migrate services one by one as needed. That is the way I recommend doing it. Keep the old one working while you fix the issues on the new one. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange C programming problem
Using an input of something other than 2.5 changes the middle two lines in some way in which I haven't yet discerned a pattern, but the result is still highly bogus. Adding -std=gnu99 to the compile makes it work, it seems by selecting a different strtof implementation in /usr/include/stdlib.h. Maybe the gcc folks are interested, I dunno. -Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:34:01AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Message: 23 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:11:59 -0400 From: Dan Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate confignot found To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip If you have a router, then the ADSL connection you have is handled by the router, and is invisible to you, on the LAN side of the router. The router could be connecting to the WAN via a piece of wet string, as far as you care. So you should just have eth0 do DHCP and leave it connected to the router. You'll get an address like 192.168.1.2 from the router. You don't need ppp0 at all; to Centos the router appears like a LAN that routes to the Internet. In Windows, do ipconfig in a Command window, and you'll see what I mean. You should see something similar with ifconfig in Centos. Dan: Thank you for replying! I will try what you suggested, ASAP. Yesterday was Friday the 13th I need to get this working, before I try to get my Firewall/Router working! Lanny Some pain-in-the-ass ISP's force you to do PPPoE instead of DHCP. Some give you a DSL modem that does NAT and the PPPoE stuff for you, some don't. If you have one that doesn't, a cheap Linksys router can do the NAT and PPPoE for you if you don't fee comfortable doing it in Linux. I prefer to to use a Sangoma S518 ADSL PCI card for $120US and do everything on the Linux side. Fortunately, I have a static and not dynamic address, but the majority is the same. The big advantage is that I can do traffic shaping / QoS without dealing with massive modem buffers which can totally screw that up. It's good enough that I can run torrents, interactive ssh sessions, and VoIP calls all at the same time on a 1.5/384 DSL connection. While this doesn't fix your problem, it's food for thought. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Strange C programming problem
I've got this little program I wrote to test something, and
it keeps giving the wrong result. I'm not inexperienced in C,
but I can't believe strtof (et al) are broken, so I must be
doing something wrong. However, I've spent hours looking at
this and comparing it to the man pages and don't see what I'm
doing wrong. strtod() and strtold() also give equally wrong
results. (the example program given on the strotd man page
works fine, BTW.)
Can someone wield a clue-bat please? :)
Here's the program:
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
#include stdlib.h
#include errno.h
int main (int argc, char ** argv)
{
float ldbl = 0.0;
char * endp;
printf (%s\n, argv[1]);
errno = 0;
ldbl = strtof (argv[1], endp);
if (errno != 0)
printf (strtof failed! errno=%d\n, errno);
printf (%f\n, (double) ldbl);
printf (%f\n, (double) strtof (argv[1], (char **)NULL));
printf (%f\n, (double) atof (argv[1]));
return 0;
}
Compile it with:
cc -O0 -g -o x4 x4.c
then run it like this:
./x4 2.5
and I'd EXPECT it to produce this output:
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
but it actually produces this:
2.5
1075838976.00
1075838976.00
2.50
the typecase of the arg in the 3 printf calls makes no
difference. Remove it and the results are the same.
Using an input of something other than 2.5 changes the middle
two lines in some way in which I haven't yet discerned a
pattern, but the result is still highly bogus.
The following strtod line works fine on my system (CentOS 5, latest updates,
x86_64):
printf (%lf\n, (double) strtod (argv[1], (char **)NULL));
For strtof, the SYNOPSIS in the man page mentions you need to add:
#define _ISO_C99_SOURCE
Or
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
Either line should be added before ALL include files (note there is a
mistake in the synopsis. There should be no = sign in the define statement
for _XOPEN_SOURCE).
The above #define lines enforces C99 compatibility rules, which is the
revised ISO C standard which came out in 1999. As a previous responder
suggested, you can also specify -std=gnu99 or -std=C99 on the compile line.
Michael
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange C programming problem
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:52:09PM -0400, Michael Velez wrote:
I've got this little program I wrote to test something, and
it keeps giving the wrong result. I'm not inexperienced in C,
but I can't believe strtof (et al) are broken, so I must be
doing something wrong. However, I've spent hours looking at
this and comparing it to the man pages and don't see what I'm
doing wrong. strtod() and strtold() also give equally wrong
results. (the example program given on the strotd man page
works fine, BTW.)
Can someone wield a clue-bat please? :)
Here's the program:
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
#include stdlib.h
#include errno.h
int main (int argc, char ** argv)
{
float ldbl = 0.0;
char * endp;
printf (%s\n, argv[1]);
errno = 0;
ldbl = strtof (argv[1], endp);
if (errno != 0)
printf (strtof failed! errno=%d\n, errno);
printf (%f\n, (double) ldbl);
printf (%f\n, (double) strtof (argv[1], (char **)NULL));
printf (%f\n, (double) atof (argv[1]));
return 0;
}
Compile it with:
cc -O0 -g -o x4 x4.c
then run it like this:
./x4 2.5
and I'd EXPECT it to produce this output:
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
but it actually produces this:
2.5
1075838976.00
1075838976.00
2.50
the typecase of the arg in the 3 printf calls makes no
difference. Remove it and the results are the same.
Using an input of something other than 2.5 changes the middle
two lines in some way in which I haven't yet discerned a
pattern, but the result is still highly bogus.
The following strtod line works fine on my system (CentOS 5, latest updates,
x86_64):
printf (%lf\n, (double) strtod (argv[1], (char **)NULL));
For strtof, the SYNOPSIS in the man page mentions you need to add:
#define _ISO_C99_SOURCE
Or
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
Either line should be added before ALL include files (note there is a
mistake in the synopsis. There should be no = sign in the define statement
for _XOPEN_SOURCE).
The above #define lines enforces C99 compatibility rules, which is the
revised ISO C standard which came out in 1999. As a previous responder
suggested, you can also specify -std=gnu99 or -std=C99 on the compile line.
Michael
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I'm using Centos 4.5. And the man
page here doesn't mention those #define settings. I'll give it a try,
thanks!
--
---
.Fred Smith /
( /__ ,__. __ __ / __ : /
// / /__) / / /__) .+' Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471
Jude 1:24,25 -
pgpNiPSHtvWEl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix Question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I've googled around and although I get a lot of hits about postfix smarthost authentication with ssl, I can not find out how to actually accomplish the task. I've read through smatterings of postings from Neophasis and the like searching for just the syntax and what file (I assume it's main.cf) I should be using; however, any smtpd_ lines I have tried result in postfix hanging and refusing to deliver mail. smtpd_* is the wrong configuration option. It applies to Postfix acting as server, while you want to configure Postfix being the client. So you have to read through man 5 postconf for smtp_ (smtp_tls_*) options. I could simply cease using smarthost, but my ip address is dynamic (yes I know stop yelling at me I'm poor right now) so mail bounces to some domains if I don't use smarthost. The server I'm running postfix on is CentOS 4 (fully updated). Postfix version is 2.2.10-1.1.el4 (from rpm -qa). I have not had sufficient downtime to upgrade to CentOS 5. Should I do that? Sincerely For what a howto when you can read the manpage for postconf? Even each smarthost can be configured with different musts, so there can't be a globally valid setup guide. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos on the decTOP?
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:51 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: It does have ethernet Via a USB module. And it only supports USB 1.1. Oh, yeah, now I see that. And at http://www.enicomms.com/decTOP/ you can even see a pic of the Ethernet USB dongle. But USB 1.1 = 10Mb Ethernet (and isn't USB full duplex so you can run your Ethernet full duplex too?). At the price... Would be nice if I could know if I can pull that GX500 and put in a slightly faster cpu Nope. It's a BGA package so it's soldered directly to the PCB. PCB = Printed Circuit Board. What is BGA? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos on the decTOP?
Nope. It's a BGA package so it's soldered directly to the PCB. PCB = Printed Circuit Board. What is BGA? ball grid array. a chip carrier that has an array of solder dots or balls on the bottom, its surface-mount soldered to a PCBA and completely impossible to work on with conventional tools. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos on a Flash drive and Micro drive
I am considering putting together a 'micro server' that I can easily travel with. I am seriously considering the decTOP, as at $99 (plus the cost of a 256MB SIMM) is amazingly priced. But I want to run on batteries, so trash a real hard drive. I have a couple of IDE to Compact flash adapters that support 2 flash cards. So I was considering a 4Gb (or even 2Gb) cheap real fash card for the OS and a 4 or 8 Gb micro drive (I have a 4Gb sitting in a drawer gathering dust got to figure out how to fix its paritions that I messed up). So I was thinking to put the more static parts of the OS on the flash card and the not static parts on the micro drive. Obviously the Swap partition, /home, and /var/log go onto the micro drive. What else? /tmp? Are /dev and /proc real things on disk or only pointers to the various devices? And then how do I put all these directory trees on the micro drive. I currently use a LVM partition for my /home on my notebook, but this is a lot more. Do I do Symbolic links? Or what. Are there any howtos? I have not found anything to help me so far. Probably got at least a week to figure this out. Obviously I don't have the system right now. And monday it is off to San Fran for the IEEE 802 meeting... (and the following week IETF in Chicago, family gets really upset when I have these 'back-to-back' conferences). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Tired of temp induced shutdowns
My notebook has a habit of getting hot, and Centos just shuts down. Just did it again: Jul 15 01:35:12 nc4010 kernel: ACPI: Critical trip point Jul 15 01:35:12 nc4010 kernel: Critical temperature reached (113 C), shutting down. Jul 15 01:35:12 nc4010 kernel: Critical temperature reached (55 C), shutting down. Jul 15 01:35:13 nc4010 shutdown[9847]: shutting down for system halt Jul 15 01:35:13 nc4010 gconfd (rgm-2904): Received signal 15, shutting down cleanly Jul 15 01:35:13 nc4010 gconfd (rgm-2904): Exiting What I would like to know is where are the threshholds stored? It would be nice if some alarm went off (like with low battery), giving me time to grab the blue-ice block out of the freezer (or at least saving some work and pointers!). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
