Re: [CentOS] annoying random Firefox crash - how to debug?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote: > Hi, > > I have the same behaviour here on my known-good memory (8GiByte) > 'workstation', both for Firefox (have about 100 tabs open, spread over > four windows) and Thunderbird, w/Thunderbird having 'uptimes' of a few > weeks regularly, while FF tends to crash every ten to 15 days (give or > take). > > To sum it up: I don't really think it's a memory problem. It can't be > excluded, of course, but maybe there's more crash prone stuff in there. > > Timo > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFLe5zdfg746kcGBOwRAj5gAJ9HcCcH/OpIRFXnSBHTja5VBSAuxACgjJNN > PUBKb+K0GtmVBtIzAosP6bY= > =Xj13 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > > Something interesting that I picked up is that Thunderbird will close randomly (very seldom though) as well, so I don't know if it's Firefox specific though. I have picked up that it happens more often when my PC's memory usage is above 2GB RAM, and memtest86+ didn't indicate any memory problems. If I have less tabs open, it happens less often, but the more tabs I have open, the more often it happens. At the same time, on the same PC, when I'm in Windows XP SP3 (dual boot), I can have many more tabs open as well as Thunderbird, Quickbooks, Photoshop CS3 and some other applications, and it doesn't cash. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] annoying random Firefox crash - how to debug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Rudi Ahlers spake: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:51 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >>> Does anyone know how to check for a problem? >> The first thing to do is disable all firefox plugins and see if the >> problem goes away. >> >> -- >> MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com >> >> ___ >> >> I already tried that, no luck :) > > In fact,I only installed 3 plug-ins yesterday, had nothing before that. > > Something interesting that I picked up is that Thunderbird will close > randomly (very seldom though) as well, so I don't know if it's Firefox > specific though. > > I have picked up that it happens more often when my PC's memory usage is > above 2GB RAM, and memtest86+ didn't indicate any memory problems. If I have > less tabs open, it happens less often, but the more tabs I have open, the > more often it happens. Hi, I have the same behaviour here on my known-good memory (8GiByte) 'workstation', both for Firefox (have about 100 tabs open, spread over four windows) and Thunderbird, w/Thunderbird having 'uptimes' of a few weeks regularly, while FF tends to crash every ten to 15 days (give or take). To sum it up: I don't really think it's a memory problem. It can't be excluded, of course, but maybe there's more crash prone stuff in there. Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLe5zdfg746kcGBOwRAj5gAJ9HcCcH/OpIRFXnSBHTja5VBSAuxACgjJNN PUBKb+K0GtmVBtIzAosP6bY= =Xj13 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Adobe 64Bit Flash Player 10 went alpha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just for the ones who didn't hear about this yet: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html Best, Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLe517fg746kcGBOwRAmUXAJ44kADgA8Dj6HfntfnHa1Obn1xfZQCbBjvC LjR1yy+qioA1N7Eo7WtVjRM= =S0fb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] annoying random Firefox crash - how to debug?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:51 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how to check for a problem? > > The first thing to do is disable all firefox plugins and see if the > problem goes away. > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com > > ___ > > I already tried that, no luck :) In fact,I only installed 3 plug-ins yesterday, had nothing before that. Something interesting that I picked up is that Thunderbird will close randomly (very seldom though) as well, so I don't know if it's Firefox specific though. I have picked up that it happens more often when my PC's memory usage is above 2GB RAM, and memtest86+ didn't indicate any memory problems. If I have less tabs open, it happens less often, but the more tabs I have open, the more often it happens. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] annoying random Firefox crash - how to debug?
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:51 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Does anyone know how to check for a problem? The first thing to do is disable all firefox plugins and see if the problem goes away. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] annoying random Firefox crash - how to debug?
Hi, My firefox (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091216 Fedora/3.5.6-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.6) on Gnome 2.26.3 will randomly crash, without any errors. /var/log/messages & /var/log/Xorg.0.log doesn't show anything that caused any errors. And it doesn't matter on which website(s) I'm busy with, it will just crash. Does anyone know how to check for a problem? My PC has: Intel Pentium(R) Dual-Core E5200 CPU 4GB DDRII Corsair RAM 3x 160GB SATAII HDD Asus Nvidia 8800GT graphics card. I have updated to the latest nVidia drivers [r...@rudi-pc ~]# dmesg | grep nvidia nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. nvidia :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 nvidia-config-d[1399]: segfault at 7f088800 ip 003ff107bf54 sp 739d1898 error 4 in libc-2.10.2.so[3ff100+164000] [r...@rudi-pc ~]# dmesg | grep nvidia nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. nvidia :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 nvidia-config-d[1399]: segfault at 7f088800 ip 003ff107bf54 sp 739d1898 error 4 in libc-2.10.2.so[3ff100+164000] [r...@rudi-pc ~]# uname -a Linux Rudi-PC 2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Feb 11 07:06:34 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux P.S. This is on Fedora Core 12, but it's RH based, so I thought maybe someone on this list might have some insight into the problem? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] password protect kickstart ftp
Hello all: Does anyone know if it's possible to set an ftp user and password on the kickstart? E.g., something like: At the GRuB prompt of the boot.iso: linux ks=ftp://username:passw...@192.168.0.100/authftp/ks/standard.ks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Configuring Local Repo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:22:43PM -0500, Alberto Garcia Gomez wrote: > I have a local repo of Centos, I'll like to used as part of my Internet > Repos, > so I wonder how can I do that If you've rsync'd one of the standard mirrors then something like this... create a file /etc/yum.repos.d/mycentos.repo which has lines such as [c5-local] name=CentOS-$releasever - Media baseurl=file:///RedHat/DVD/CentOS-5/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 protect=1 priority=1 enabled=1 [update-local] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates local baseurl=file:///RedHat/updates/centos$releasever/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 protect=1 priority=1 enabled=1 This will create two new repo's for yum to use; one looking at the DVD contents and one looking at the (rsync'd) updates folder. In my case they're stored on an NFS server automounted at /RedHat. If you're doing this via a web server then just put in your http:// values. If, instead, you're talking about creating your own package repository then look into something like "mrepo" to create the repository metadata and then create a yum.repos.d file to point to it. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Configuring Local Repo
I have a local repo of Centos, I'll like to used as part of my Internet Repos, so I wonder how can I do that ___ Atte. Alberto García Gómez M:.M:. Administrador de Redes/Webmaster Dirección Provincial de Educación. Matanzas, Cuba. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SAS raid controllers
Gordon McLellan wrote: > Is anyone running either the newish Adaptec 5805 or the new LSI > (3ware) 9750 sas raid controllers in a production environment with > Centos 5.3/5.4? > > The low price of these cards makes me suspicious, compared to the more > expensive pre-merger 3ware cards and considerably more expensive Areca > ARC-1680. I've been 'burned' by the low cost of Promise raid cards > (just as this group pointed out, they're crap cards!), but I'm still > not convinced that most expensive == best. > > When it comes to parallel scsi cards, Adaptec has always been my > choice regardless of platform, but I've never used their serial scsi > products. I have several older pre-merger 3ware cards installed and > have been working flawlessly for years, but under a windows environment. > LSI has always been my SCSI goto vendor of choice, and the line of LSI/MegaRAID cards have had a long track record.. Also note that of most of the big iron Unix RISC server companies use LSI as their main scsi/sas/etc vendor of choice.. However, this is apparently a 3ware design, and LSI has I guess acquired 3ware, so I'm not sure what all that means. but in general, if the raid card doesn't have battery backed write-back cache, I'm of the opinion you might as well use JBOD and native OS raid (mdraid or zfs or whatever). It does appear at least some of those 9750 cards have a BBU option http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/internal_raid/megaraid_sas/3ware/index.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SAS raid controllers
On 02/16/2010 06:17 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > The low price of these cards makes me suspicious, compared to the more > expensive pre-merger 3ware cards and considerably more expensive Areca > ARC-1680. Dont have an answer to your question as such, but I can tell you that the Arc-1680's are very nice. I've been using 4 of these cards for a few months now. no problems, and excellent performance ( i run raid-10, 12 disks off each of the hba's ) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SAS raid controllers
Is anyone running either the newish Adaptec 5805 or the new LSI (3ware) 9750 sas raid controllers in a production environment with Centos 5.3/5.4? The low price of these cards makes me suspicious, compared to the more expensive pre-merger 3ware cards and considerably more expensive Areca ARC-1680. I've been 'burned' by the low cost of Promise raid cards (just as this group pointed out, they're crap cards!), but I'm still not convinced that most expensive == best. When it comes to parallel scsi cards, Adaptec has always been my choice regardless of platform, but I've never used their serial scsi products. I have several older pre-merger 3ware cards installed and have been working flawlessly for years, but under a windows environment. I noticed none of these manufacturers are listed on the upstream provider's HCL, yet they all eagerly claim "Linux" support on their respective websites.. The Adapetc website actually names both Centos and the upstream provider as 'supported'. Kind Regards, Gordon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip packages centos4
Terry Polzin wrote:
> On Tuesday February 16 2010 04:45:05 John Doe wrote:
>
>> From: Terry Polzin
>>
>>
>>> where can I find packages for hplip and it's deps for centos4x?
>>>
>> Google pointed to this...
>> http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html
>>
>> JD
>>
>>
>>
> Been there, just source not a helpful site at all. Hplip's many deps that
> seem to be outside the mainstream distro make it hard to compile.
>
It has been too long ago to remember the details but I just mounted a
CentOS-4 disk to verify that I did, in fact, rebuild hplip for
CentOS-4. I don't know where the SRPM came from (I suspect it was for
some version of Fedora) but it successfully built on that CentOS-4 box.
I *DO* remember that there were allegedly some problems with scanning
and faxing on all-in-one printers back then but all I needed was the
"supplies" (ink levels) function.
[r...@madeleine oldsys]# find . -type f -name hplip-0.9.7-4.2.i386.rpm
-exec ls -l {} \;
-rw-rw-r-- 1 rj 501 6725260 Jan 15 2006
./home/rj/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/hplip-0.9.7-4.2.i386.rpm
[r...@madeleine oldsys]# rpm -qip
./home/rj/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/hplip-0.9.7-4.2.i386.rpm
Name: hplipRelocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.9.7 Vendor: (none)
Release : 4.2 Build Date: Sun 15 Jan 2006
10:40:46 PM CST
Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: mavis.localdomain
Group : System Environment/DaemonsSource RPM:
hplip-0.9.7-4.2.src.rpm
Size: 8597226 License: GPL/MIT/BSD
Signature : (none)
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/hpinkjet
Summary : HP Linux Imaging and Printing Project
Description :
The Hewlett-Packard Linux Imaging and Printing Project provides
drivers for HP printers and multi-function peripherals.
[r...@madeleine oldsys]#
The source is no longer in the SRPMS directory and I have no idea where
I got it -- but if I were guessing, I'd guess it was from Rpmforge.
If I were doing it, I would try rebuilding some SRPMS **BUT** before
installing one of those homemade puppies, run this little script to be
certain that the RPM contains no files that will over-write existing files.
--
#!/bin/bash
T=""
rpm -qlp $T > /tmp/xxfiles.txt
echo "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" >> /tmp/xxfiles.txt
while read F
do
if [ -e "$F" ]
then
echo "$F Exists!"
fi
done < /tmp/xxfiles.txt
exit
-
(The 4th line above is there only as a quick test that the script will
report conflicts.)
BTW, if you keep the "xxfiles", copied somewhere safe and renamed, you
should be able to easily undo any silliness that results.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] MonoDevelop for CentOS
Did anyone know where can I find the MonoDevelop as RPM? I wonder if thereś any version under 2.2 Regards ___ Atte. Alberto García Gómez M:.M:. Administrador de Redes/Webmaster Dirección Provincial de Educación. Matanzas, Cuba. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem in gdb
Balaji wrote on 02/16/2010 12:32 AM: > Dear All, > > We are running RHEL4 Update 4 AS IA-64 on a HP rx6600. > > We are running programs compiled in RHEL4 Update 4 AS in i386 > architecture using the emul library(Intel IA-32 Execution Layer ) Begs the questions: Why such an obsolete version? Why are you posting to the CentOS list? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] priorities don't prevent other repos overwritting packages?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:53:40 -0500: > > > Either I've made a mistake in my configuration or else packages from > > other repos can obsolete core packages > > You want to add > check_obsoletes = 1 > in priorities.conf. Yup, that seems to add the required protection. Thanks! > That should be set by default, but isn't. Yeah, I agree :-) -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] is yum a complete substitute of rpm?
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote: > I use rpm for basic stuff because it runs faster. For example: > > $ time yum list installed > ... > real0m17.069s > user0m0.857s > sys 0m0.675s > > $ time rpm -qa > ... > real0m4.714s > user0m4.457s > sys 0m0.120s > > Yum tends to take a while to read in its databases before it processes > your command. So for simple commands, it is faster to use rpm. On slow > boxes, it can be significantly faster. naw -- The 'speed' issue here comes down to a scripting language v a compiled one -- librpm underneath on each in CentOS 5. Here is a more apple to apples comparison on those timings on the work being done [herr...@centos-5 clang]$ time rpm -qa --nosignature \ --nodigest > /dev/null real0m0.329s user0m0.208s sys 0m0.076s [herr...@centos-5 clang]$ time yum list installed > /dev/null real0m4.252s user0m1.948s sys 0m0.132s [herr...@centos-5 clang]$ -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
Robert P. J. Day wrote on Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:16:09 -0500 (EST): > do i have a lot to worry about in terms > of mentally backing up one version? or is simply upgrading the centos > box to mysql 5.1 an option? I haven't seen any problems. I use the mysql 5.1 from the remy repo. I don't have it in heavy production, though. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
Robert P. J. Day wrote: > being used to mysql 5.1 on my fedora system, i'm suddenly looking > after a centos 5.4 box with mysql 5.0.77. before i start digging into > the mysql 5.0-5.1 changelog, do i have a lot to worry about in terms > of mentally backing up one version? or is simply upgrading the centos > box to mysql 5.1 an option? (i realize that mysql 5.1 is *not* > officially supported in centos 5.4.) There's a packaged 5.1.41 in the remi repo. I'm running it (and php5.3.1) on one machine as a side effect of getting the ocsinventory server there. I'm not running much else that isn't perl or java on that machine so I don't know if it can cause other problems. http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache bandwidth limiting?
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Frank Cox > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 23:52 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache bandwidth limiting? > > > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 23:44 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > What is the EPEL repo? > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=centos+epel It was too late at night for Google. Thanks for the movie with my morning coffee. > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] pam_mount
Hi. >> I am a bit confused about the usage of pam_mount. >> >> Here is my /etc/pam.d/system-auth: >> >> auth required pam_env.so >> auth required pam_mount.so >> > > add use_first_pass to this?? In auth stage the pam_mount requests it's passwd from stdin and passes it to the other modules. >> If pam_mount.so is listed in the session definition I will be asked >> for the password a second time during SSH login: As noted, the second password request is called in session stage which does not accept pass options (and should not even ask for a password afaik) >> So my question is: what is the session entry used for within pam_mount >> (as the usage is suggested in the man page and in the docs)? Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] pam_mount
Marcus Moeller wrote: Hi all, I am a bit confused about the usage of pam_mount. Here is my /etc/pam.d/system-auth: authrequired pam_env.so authrequired pam_mount.so add use_first_pass to this?? authsufficientpam_unix.so nullok try_first_pass authrequisite pam_succeed_if.so uid >= 500 quiet authsufficientpam_krb5.so use_first_pass authrequired pam_deny.so account required pam_unix.so broken_shadow account sufficientpam_localuser.so account sufficientpam_succeed_if.so uid < 500 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_krb5.so account required pam_permit.so passwordrequisite pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass retry=3 passwordsufficientpam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok passwordsufficientpam_krb5.so use_authtok passwordrequired pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so session optional pam_mkhomedir.so session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in crond quiet use_uid session required pam_unix.so session optional pam_krb5.so session optional pam_mount.so If pam_mount.so is listed in the session definition I will be asked for the password a second time during SSH login: At this stage the share is already mounted. I can just remove the: session optional pam_mount.so from system-auth which seem to work fine. Even the share is unmounted successfully on logout. So my question is: what is the session entry used for within pam_mount (as the usage is suggested in the man page and in the docs)? Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos <>___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip packages centos4
On Tuesday February 16 2010 04:45:05 John Doe wrote: > From: Terry Polzin > > > where can I find packages for hplip and it's deps for centos4x? > > Google pointed to this... > http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html > > JD > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Been there, just source not a helpful site at all. Hplip's many deps that seem to be outside the mainstream distro make it hard to compile. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [OT?] diffs between mysql 5.0 and 5.1, and upgrading to mysql 5.1?
being used to mysql 5.1 on my fedora system, i'm suddenly looking after a centos 5.4 box with mysql 5.0.77. before i start digging into the mysql 5.0-5.1 changelog, do i have a lot to worry about in terms of mentally backing up one version? or is simply upgrading the centos box to mysql 5.1 an option? (i realize that mysql 5.1 is *not* officially supported in centos 5.4.) rday -- Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip packages centos4
From: Terry Polzin > where can I find packages for hplip and it's deps for centos4x? Google pointed to this... http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] R package on centos 5.1
From: Hersh Installing: R i386 2.10.0-2.el5 epel 14 k > I tried to install with command you mentioned but it says .. >No package R available. >Nothing to do Notice the epel (repository). JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] priorities don't prevent other repos overwritting packages?
Stephen Harris wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:53:40 -0500: > Either I've made a mistake in my configuration or else packages from > other repos can obsolete core packages You want to add check_obsoletes = 1 in priorities.conf. That should be set by default, but isn't. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache bandwidth limiting?
Dne 16.2.2010 2:30, Jason Pyeron napsal(a): > Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras > repo? > Jason, you can find a lot of Apache modules for C4 within my repo: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/letter_m.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/letter_m.group.html Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] pam_mount
Hi all, I am a bit confused about the usage of pam_mount. Here is my /etc/pam.d/system-auth: authrequired pam_env.so authrequired pam_mount.so authsufficientpam_unix.so nullok try_first_pass authrequisite pam_succeed_if.so uid >= 500 quiet authsufficientpam_krb5.so use_first_pass authrequired pam_deny.so account required pam_unix.so broken_shadow account sufficientpam_localuser.so account sufficientpam_succeed_if.so uid < 500 quiet account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_krb5.so account required pam_permit.so passwordrequisite pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass retry=3 passwordsufficientpam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok passwordsufficientpam_krb5.so use_authtok passwordrequired pam_deny.so session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so session optional pam_mkhomedir.so session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in crond quiet use_uid session required pam_unix.so session optional pam_krb5.so session optional pam_mount.so If pam_mount.so is listed in the session definition I will be asked for the password a second time during SSH login: At this stage the share is already mounted. I can just remove the: session optional pam_mount.so from system-auth which seem to work fine. Even the share is unmounted successfully on logout. So my question is: what is the session entry used for within pam_mount (as the usage is suggested in the man page and in the docs)? Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
