Re: [CentOS] frr packages for CentOS 8
Yeah, as denoted by the "8" in the URL. Thanks for your ever so helpful response! On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm not seeing free range routing (frr) packages for CentOS 8. > > > > The RHEL8 docs say frr is the replacement for quagga. > > > > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/configuring_and_managing_networking/setting-your-routing-protocols_configuring-and-managing-networking > > > > What am i missing? > > Wild guess, above description is for RH 8.1 and not for CentOS 8.0. > > Simon > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] frr packages for CentOS 8
Hello, I'm not seeing free range routing (frr) packages for CentOS 8. The RHEL8 docs say frr is the replacement for quagga. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/configuring_and_managing_networking/setting-your-routing-protocols_configuring-and-managing-networking What am i missing? Cheers, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)
Without wanting to be too provocative, I am running Fedora 21 on a workstation and Fedora 20 on a laptop. I can't see myself ever running an OS based on either of these for a server. It's about that whole **d thing. But at least sssd works, despite the poor desktop environment ;-) Thanks guys On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:15:35 + > Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > Besides, I was never able to make Mate sticky, i.e. after each logout C7 > > reverted to the default DE for the user, whatever I did. Same thing with > KDE. > > yum remove gnome-classic-session gnome-session-xsession > > That removes the gnome-classic.desktop, gnome-custom-session.desktop and > gnome.desktop files from the /usr/share/xsessions directory without > affecting any gnome or gtk programs. All that's left in that directory now > is mate.desktop, no choices show up on the gdm login screen, mate is the > default and only available desktop. > > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)
Hi all, Is anyone using C7 in production with LDAP and kerberos? Currently all of my machines run C5 or C6 with nss-pam-ldapd or nss_ldap, with kerberos and pam_krb5 for authentication. Before I fire up a test VM (is it even worth it?) I wanted to check feedback from the community. Cheers! Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > That said, what in Dogs name does this thread have to do with > CentOS?? Can we please STOP already? Hi, Not wanting to drag out this topic, or post anything inflamatory. Also I am not necessarily replying only to John, but to the thread in general :-) Where I work, a number of staff are being given ipods and ipads to use corporate web applications. The system is eventually going to completely replace a network of thin clients around the place. In my opinion, the touch screen creates a whole new paradigm for computing. The downside of this paradigm shift, is that our employee facing systems do need to be updated to fully support touch screens. In our tests, we have found users WANT to use an ipod to help them with their work. And when they use an ipod, they take more pride in their work, and make less errors. And when they do make errors, they tend to fix them on the spot. This all has something to do with CentOS in a round-about way. I am using CentOS to host our corporate web apps in a tomcat6 instance. Just adding my 2 cents. Regards, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PE850 Interrupt conflicts on CentOS 5 and onboard ethernet and pci-e serial
Hello, The kernel was updated today to the latest, but I have also tried the previous few kernels. The machine was recently updated to the latest bios revision for a PE850 (A04) which was included in my post. I apologise for posting the corporate email sig, but your post really isn't much better. Do you have any real advice or experience with this model of server running CentOS/RHEL? Or were you only really posting to complain about my sig and disclaimer? Regards, Dan (Posting in plain text mode just in case someone out there still reads with pine or elm) From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen Sent: Friday, 26 November 2010 10:07 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] PE850 Interrupt conflicts on CentOS 5 and onboard ethernet and pci-e serial I'm fairly stumped, and I'm about ready to try different serial hardware. Any clues from the experts on this list? Are you using latest centos release and kernel? Try updating bios to latest version? Jackie's Legal Disclaimer: Please, do not post legal disclaimers to mailinglists. -- Eero, RHCE ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] PE850 Interrupt conflicts on CentOS 5 and onboard ethernet and pci-e serial
Hello, I have an interrupt conflict between a two port pci-e serial card and the onboard ethernet controllers in a PowerEdge 850. I'm running kernel 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5PAE with bios revision A04. In every instance, the two serial ports have been allocated the same interrupts as the two ethernet controllers. I have tried many kernel boot options, including acpi=off, pci=noirq, acpi=noirq. When I enter the bios, I can see the same interrupts allocated to the serial ports and ethernet controllers. Attempting to change the interrupts manual causes both a nic and a serial port to both change, both to the same interrupt. I have even tried disabling onboard usb and serial with no change. I'm beginning to think the pci-e serial card is broken under linux. I have a similar card running on a PE850 under Windows Server 2003 and there are no such conflicts. Here is some output from lspci -v : 02:00.0 Serial controller: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd OX16PCI954 (Quad 16950 UART) function 0 (Uart) (prog-if 06 [16950]) Subsystem: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd Unknown device 0001 Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 137 I/O ports at ecf8 [size=8] Memory at feaff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] I/O ports at ece0 [size=16] Memory at feafe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Memory at feafd000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 1 02:01.0 Serial controller: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd OXCB950 Cardbus 16950 UART (prog-if 06 [16950]) Subsystem: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd Unknown device 0001 Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 145 I/O ports at ecf0 [disabled] [size=8] Memory at feafc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K] I/O ports at ecd0 [disabled] [size=16] Memory at feafb000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K] Memory at feafa000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 1 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit Ethe rnet PCI Express (rev 11) Subsystem: Dell Unknown device 01b6 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 137 Memory at fe5f (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Expansion ROM at [disabled] Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/3 Enable - Capabilities: [d0] Express Endpoint IRQ 0 Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [13c] Virtual Channel 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit Ethe rnet PCI Express (rev 11) Subsystem: Dell Unknown device 01b6 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 145 Memory at fe3f (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Expansion ROM at [disabled] Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/3 Enable - Capabilities: [d0] Express Endpoint IRQ 0 Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [13c] Virtual Channel I'm fairly stumped, and I'm about ready to try different serial hardware. Any clues from the experts on this list? Regards, Dan -- dan irwin it manager jackie's wholesale nurseries p/l t/a zoomgarden 56 coutts drive burpengary qld 4505 email d...@jackies.com.au tel 07 3888 2481 fax 07 3888 2530 Jackie's Legal Disclaimer: 1) This email is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email and delete the document. 2) All emails sent to and from Jackie's Wholesale Nurseries Pty Ltd. are scanned for content. Any material deemed to contain inappropriate subject matter will be reported to the email administrator of all parties concerned. <>___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Thin client system for X applications?
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org >[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Davis > >We're looking for what, years ago, I'd describe a s a X terminal -- >something small, simple (and ideally cheap) that a user could display >X applications on. Another vote for Thinstation. We netboot it on a number of wyse models, 5125, 5150, and V50L. Admittidly, we use it to connect to windows 2003 terminal services, but they do start X11 and rdesktop, so should be fine alongside xdm/gdm etc. Cheers, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mail server best practices question
>-Original Message- >If necessary I am willing to implement a new mail server and a new >backup mx. > >What I would like to know is what solution you guys would >recommend for >the mail server and the backup MX? > >Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > Running a backup or secondary MX at this point is largely a waste of time. The only thing a backup MX gets you is an increase in spam. Most MTAs will retry sending every couple of hours. So if your MX is down for a while, it's not really a big issue. I run a cluster of sendmail servers (at MX 0) with spamassassin and clamav, and it works quite well. Provides redundnacy and scalability, without the nonsense of a backup mx. The last "backup" MX I ran was probably retired at least two years ago, and even then it was well past pointless and irrelevant. Cheers, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to reroute all ADSL traffic via another server on theinternet?
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org >[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers >Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:11 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: [CentOS] how to reroute all ADSL traffic via another >server on theinternet? > >Hi all, > >Does anyone know, if it's possible to reroute all (i.e. HTTP / FTP / >DNS / SMTP / POP3 / IMAP / etc) from an ADSL connected machine via >another server, which is currently hosted with IS and has full >internet access? > > >i.e. Can I setup another machine, on a different public IP than the >dynamic ADSL IP as default gw? OR do I need todo something on that >machine to work as a router for such a setup? > >Both servers in this case is CentOS linux, but I'm sure that won't >make a big difference? > You could use GRE tunnelling, which is supported by Linux and Cisco among others. You could set up a GRE tunnel between your two sites, assign a /30 for the link, and route most traffic over the GRE interface (Minus the IP Address of your remote site - it must be routed via your internet connection). This will behave as a point-to-point link between your sites. Check out the ip(8) command, in particular the ip tunnel commands. But, something like this should be a nice start: ip tunnel add Tunnel0 mode GRE remote 1.2.3.4 ifconfig Tunnel0 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 ip route add 1.2.3.4/32 via 6.7.8.9 Cheers, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NFS mount problem
>Dan can you can the Blue Test Please? > Hey I did appologise! We do use that feature of outlook internally, and if I reply to a html post, outlook will do that by default. I already know the fix - To use my gmail account instead of my work email account for this mailing list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NFS mount problem
> But when I change these message: > /home/test 192.167.7.67(rw) > The result is not ok ~ > So what is the problem with it ? Perhaps you need to specify a netmask: /home/test 192.167.7.67/255.255.255.0(rw) Appologies in advance for the html post. Bloody outlook. Regards, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NFS mount problem
But when I change these message: /home/test 192.167.7.67(rw) The result is not ok ~ So what is the problem with it ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vmware-server-console not installed
>You don't need to downgrade for the whole OS, you can just do it for >VMware. See the procedure in the first comment in this bug >http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3884. I have done that and it >works fine. Just remember that if you update vmware, the edits to >vmware-hostd will be undone, so you need to redo them. Thanks for the mantis link, it was very informative. Cheers, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vmware-server-console not installed
> From memory, here is how you do that: > 1. Get a copy of vmware-vmrc-linux-x86.xpi (mine was in >/usr/lib/vmware/webAccess/tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.16/webapps/u i/plugin/vmware-vmrc-linux-x86.xpi) > 2. Rename the file to vmware-vmrc-linux-x86.xpi.zip > 3. Unzip the file > >Now run vmware-vmrc or pass some info like capitalized below: >vmware-vmrc -h HOST:PORT -u USER -p PASSWORD That's really cool, and probably way more elegant than using the web browser plugin. Cheers, Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vmware-server-console not installed
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org >[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kwan Lowe >Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 3:52 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] vmware-server-console not installed > >There's the glibc issue that's still unresolved. There's another >issue with using Firefox as the admin client. It *might* let you in, >but the console plugin doesn't appear to be working again. Only client >that works for me is InternetExploder. So that's why the management interfaces from vmware 2 appear to keep crashing! Also, the console plugin seems to work fine in Firefox on Fedora 12, for me anyway. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail using LDAP authentication problem
Hello, You should look at saslauthd. I have used it in the past to do precisely this; Authenticate "virtual" users for access to sendmail and cyrus-imapd. Regards, Dan From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of sync Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2010 9:40 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Sendmail using LDAP authentication problem Hi , all ; My openldap is running fine . Sendmail configuration is done. I want to use LDAP authentication only. User of my mailserver should not have a Linux users . I am running CentOS 5.3 i386 . Openldap-2.3.43-3.el5 , sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 All the software is already installed and running . LDAP has the following tree: uid=xxx, ou=People, dc=test, dc=com I want to know what I've to change which configuration file and any pointer to the doc with clearly says the configuration . Any help will be appreciated. Please I am kind of stuck and waiting for anyone who can clear this cloud. Thank you in advance ~ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
