Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
pfff only for office, if you wound a multimedia sistem with the reason mentioned in the mail before this reply centos is not for desktop, i preferred fedora 10, fedora have only 1 lack, have the software too much updated for my taste, but this is minor problem 2009/5/20 Ralph Angenendt > > Equinox86 wrote: > > yes centos is not for desktop it's guaranteee, if you don't have much > time > > and want a distro updated at last release, if you have much time to spend > to > > recompile dependences i advice use slackware, is fast and desktop > friendly, > > similar to swiss knife. > > I still call this bullshit. CentOS is perfect for a Desktop which is > used for Mail, Web and writing Office documents. Much better than all > the distributions which you have to completely update every year or so. > > Ralph > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
yes centos is not for desktop it's guaranteee, if you don't have much time and want a distro updated at last release, if you have much time to spend to recompile dependences i advice use slackware, is fast and desktop friendly, similar to swiss knife. but if you have a server, probably best choice is centos. 2009/5/20 Ralph Angenendt > > John Kennedy wrote: > > As much as I like CentOS, I tend to agree with the other posts. I don't > think > > it is the right distro for non techies. > > Why? > > > I set up my in-laws with Linux Mint (running KDE, of course) and they > could > > even handle installing the codecs and other non OSS stuff. Mint is a nice > > distro based on Ubuntu. > > And force them to update the complete Distribution every other year? > > Ralph > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] X Windows has quit working
mmm you can paste the error in Xorg.0.log file? only error --> (EE) and you can paste the section pertinent the graphic driver and monitor? thanks :D 2009/5/19 Thomas Dukes > > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of A. Kirillov > > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:38 AM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] X Windows has quit working > > > > > > Not sure when it stopped working as I don't use it often. Maybe > > > > since the upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3. Can't say for sure as > > it's been > > > > a while since tried to start X. > > > > > > > > The errors I receive when startin X are: > > > > > > > > (EE) I810(0): unknown reason for exception > > > > (EE) I810(0): cannot continue > > > > (EE) I810(0): VBE initialization failed > > > > (EE) Screen(s) found but none have a usable configuration > > > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > > No screens found > > > > If you're on x86_64 try intel driver instead of i810. > > See section "9.3. x86_64 Architectures" of upstream release notes. > > HTH > > No, this is IBM Netvista. > > Thanks! > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] fsck file system is mounted
mmm why you not reboot? you can set the service you wan in init 1 and go it 2009/5/16 > Hi, > > Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is > drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on. > > I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode. > > All suggestions are welcomed. > > -- > Thanks > http://www.911networks.com > When the network has to work > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] no snd-hda-codec.ko in CentOS 5.3 is that ok ?
did you try see the permission on: ls -l /dev/dsp ls -l /dev/audio and ls -l /dev/snd/ ? alsamixer what say? lsmod provides the correct module of your soundcard? 2009/5/16 Colonna Francois > Hello, > > When I was running CentOS 5.2 (and other Liuux distribution) on an Asus > W2J laptop, I never get sound. > > I upgraded to CentOS 5.3. > Now the sound card is recognized and plays the test sounds. > I checked channels with alsamixer, mix, kamix > I still have no sound using aplay alsa command or whatever else audio > display. > > Trying to check my configuration I discovered that the snd-hda-codec.ko > is missing : > > modprobe -l | grep hda > > gives > > /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.10.el5/kernel/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.ko > /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.10.el5/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko > > Is that the reason why I have no sound ? > > Regards, > > Francois Colonna > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos