Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-20 Thread Equinox86
pfff only for office, if you wound a multimedia sistem with the reason
mentioned in the mail before this reply centos is not for desktop, i
preferred fedora 10, fedora have only 1 lack, have the software too much
updated for my taste, but this is minor problem

2009/5/20 Ralph Angenendt 
>

> Equinox86 wrote:
> > yes centos is not for desktop it's guaranteee, if you don't have much
> time
> > and want a distro updated at last release, if you have much time to spend
> to
> > recompile dependences i advice use slackware, is fast and desktop
> friendly,
> > similar to swiss knife.
>
> I still call this bullshit. CentOS is perfect for a Desktop which is
> used for Mail, Web and writing Office documents. Much better than all
> the distributions which you have to completely update every year or so.
>
> Ralph
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-20 Thread Equinox86
yes centos is not for desktop it's guaranteee, if you don't have much time
and want a distro updated at last release, if you have much time to spend to
recompile dependences i advice use slackware, is fast and desktop friendly,
similar to swiss knife.

but if you have a server, probably best choice is centos.

2009/5/20 Ralph Angenendt 
>

> John Kennedy wrote:
> > As much as I like CentOS, I tend to agree with the other posts. I don't
> think
> > it is the right distro for non techies.
>
> Why?
>
> > I set up my in-laws with Linux Mint (running KDE, of course) and they
> could
> > even handle installing the codecs and other non OSS stuff. Mint is a nice
> > distro based on Ubuntu.
>
> And force them to update the complete Distribution every other year?
>
> Ralph
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] X Windows has quit working

2009-05-19 Thread Equinox86
mmm you can paste the error in Xorg.0.log file? only error --> (EE)

and you can paste the section pertinent the graphic driver and monitor?
thanks :D

2009/5/19 Thomas Dukes 

>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of A. Kirillov
> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:38 AM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] X Windows has quit working
> >
> > > > Not sure when it stopped working as I don't use it often.  Maybe
> > > > since the upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.  Can't say for sure as
> > it's been
> > > > a while since tried to start X.
> > > >
> > > > The errors I receive when startin X are:
> > > >
> > > > (EE) I810(0): unknown reason for exception
> > > > (EE) I810(0): cannot continue
> > > > (EE) I810(0): VBE initialization failed
> > > > (EE) Screen(s) found but none have a usable configuration
> > > >
> > > > Fatal server error:
> > > > No screens found
> >
> > If you're on x86_64 try intel driver instead of i810.
> > See section "9.3. x86_64 Architectures" of upstream release notes.
> > HTH
>
> No, this is IBM Netvista.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] fsck file system is mounted

2009-05-16 Thread Equinox86
mmm why you not reboot?

you can set the service you wan in init 1 and go it

2009/5/16 

> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
> drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
>
> I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
>
> All suggestions are welcomed.
>
> --
> Thanks
> http://www.911networks.com
> When the network has to work
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] no snd-hda-codec.ko in CentOS 5.3 is that ok ?

2009-05-16 Thread Equinox86
did you try see the permission on:
ls -l /dev/dsp
ls -l /dev/audio
and ls -l /dev/snd/
?

alsamixer what say?

lsmod provides the correct module of your soundcard?

2009/5/16 Colonna Francois 

> Hello,
>
> When I was running CentOS 5.2 (and other Liuux distribution) on an Asus
> W2J laptop, I never get sound.
>
> I upgraded to CentOS 5.3.
> Now the sound card is recognized and plays the test sounds.
> I checked channels with alsamixer, mix, kamix 
> I still have no sound using aplay alsa command or whatever else audio
> display.
>
> Trying to check my configuration I discovered that the snd-hda-codec.ko
> is missing :
>
> modprobe -l | grep hda
>
> gives
>
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.10.el5/kernel/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.10.el5/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko
>
> Is that the reason why I have no sound ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Francois Colonna
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos