Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on Large Disks [SOLVED]
Peter Kjellstrom wrote: Reconsider the multiple 500G part. Slicing a raid-set up typically has bad performance effects (how bad depends on the controller). This results from that linux now considers several parts of your one raidset as devices to be scheduled independently. Ok, looks like i am not done yet then. I would like to spend some more time trying to do a performance benchmark. But, unfortunately, time is the constraint here for me. Still, given the suggestion, i will surely try to reduce the number of slices. Thank you for the information. Regards, A.S ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on Large Disks [SOLVED]
Anup Shukla wrote: Still, given the suggestion, i will surely try to reduce the number of slices. I would make one system LUN at say 20GB and one data LUN with the rest of the RADI5 space. On the system LUN I would make a /boot filesystem and a LVM partition with at least a / filesystem and swap. Usually I make /, /usr, /opt, /home, /var and /tmp but it varies a bit depending on what kind of machine it is. The data LUN I would use as a PV directly for LVM and not bother with partitions at all. //Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on Large Disks [SOLVED]
So, i have been quite moronic in not trying to apply logic initially. Please leave that term for those who really deserve it. As for not trying perhaps the lazy label is more suitable :-P ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos