Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 07.09.2014 um 20:56 schrieb Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com:
 On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
 
 On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
 And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
 
 https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
 x86_64.
 
 It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about
 ressources, even in a linux distro with long term support and
 enterprise features.
 
 Enterprise doesn't mean waste your money. And really, to double the
 memory to install a machine - are you kidding me? They've never thought
 about it and I really hate this attitude.


i would suggest to install it offsite e.g. yum provides a installroot option.

--
LF


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby

On 09/07/2014 09:44 PM, Oliver Schad wrote:

If you have 1.000 or 10.000 machines it*is*  a reason to
think about every fucking dollar per machine you can save each month.


You could *just* *install* with 1GB and then get down to 512 at runtime.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:36:07PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
 On another slant, why don't you consider increasing the RAM to 1G,
 making the install, then cloning the disk on the other 9.999 machines?

I've typically run into the memory limit in VMs, where it is trivial
to change the memory allocated to it on the fly, so I bump up the
memory, then lower it after the install.

-- 
Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org wrote:

 If you have 1.000 or 10.000 machines it*is*  a reason to
 think about every fucking dollar per machine you can save each month.

 You could *just* *install* with 1GB and then get down to 512 at runtime.


First, if you are running 10,000 machines with 512K RAM, you are doing
something really, really weird or you just like managing a lot of
machines that can't do very much each - and supplying a lot more power
than you would need for fewer, more capable hosts.

But, if you have even more than a few, you are probably already doing
some sort of image installs.  So just install on a machine or VM with
1GB, then use ReaR or Clonezilla to back it up and restore onto the
target boxes.   Or for brute force, use dd to copy the drive and swap
them into place.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev

On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:44 am, Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
 mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org wrote:

 If you have 1.000 or 10.000 machines it*is*  a reason to
 think about every fucking dollar per machine you can save each month.

 You could *just* *install* with 1GB and then get down to 512 at runtime.


 First, if you are running 10,000 machines with 512K RAM, you are doing
 something really, really weird or you just like managing a lot of
 machines that can't do very much each - and supplying a lot more power
 than you would need for fewer, more capable hosts.

 But, if you have even more than a few, you are probably already doing
 some sort of image installs.  So just install on a machine or VM with
 1GB, then use ReaR or Clonezilla to back it up and restore onto the
 target boxes.   Or for brute force, use dd to copy the drive and swap
 them into place.

... which will be a lot of drive swapping for 1000 or 1 machines. With
this number of machines the only workable option I can think of is netboot
+ kickstart (with hard drive then network boot order in BIOS so no need to
change anything after system is installed)... But it is true what was
mentioned 1000+ weak machines are unlikely to be able to pay their
electric bills.


 --
Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Michael Hennebry

On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Valeri Galtsev wrote:


On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:44 am, Les Mikesell wrote:



But, if you have even more than a few, you are probably already doing
some sort of image installs.  So just install on a machine or VM with
1GB, then use ReaR or Clonezilla to back it up and restore onto the
target boxes.   Or for brute force, use dd to copy the drive and swap
them into place.


... which will be a lot of drive swapping for 1000 or 1 machines. With


Hence the term, brute force.


this number of machines the only workable option I can think of is netboot
+ kickstart (with hard drive then network boot order in BIOS so no need to
change anything after system is installed)... But it is true what was
mentioned 1000+ weak machines are unlikely to be able to pay their
electric bills.


--
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical
reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young
goat to your SCSI chain now and then.   --   John Woods
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:

 On Mon, September 8, 2014 9:44 am, Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
 mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org wrote:

 If you have 1.000 or 10.000 machines it*is*  a reason to
 think about every fucking dollar per machine you can save each month.

 You could *just* *install* with 1GB and then get down to 512 at runtime.


 First, if you are running 10,000 machines with 512K RAM, you are doing
 something really, really weird or you just like managing a lot of
 machines that can't do very much each - and supplying a lot more power
 than you would need for fewer, more capable hosts.

 But, if you have even more than a few, you are probably already doing
 some sort of image installs.  So just install on a machine or VM with
 1GB, then use ReaR or Clonezilla to back it up and restore onto the
 target boxes.   Or for brute force, use dd to copy the drive and swap
 them into place.

 ... which will be a lot of drive swapping for 1000 or 1 machines. With
 this number of machines the only workable option I can think of is netboot
 + kickstart (with hard drive then network boot order in BIOS so no need to
 change anything after system is installed)... But it is true what was
 mentioned 1000+ weak machines are unlikely to be able to pay their
 electric bills.

Drive swapping is pretty easy on servers with hotswap bays.  If you
can rack the machines you would be able to swap the drives.   But,
Clonezilla with the DRBL server  has a multicast option that will
install the same image on a bunch of machines at once - and it is
fairly agnostic about the OS it is loading so it is useful in a
heterogeneous environment.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
  lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 09/07/2014 07:44 PM, Oliver Schad wrote:
 And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM, only the installer is
 br0ken. Is it a java installer? *g*

you can either do an image install, or install the media on a different
device and move it over. if you have thousands of machines, you likely
have some level of automation around this already

-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
Just FYI:

I had several problems to install CentOS 7 with 512 MB RAM. No log
showed me that problem (I would expect a system check before).

With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...

Best Regards
Oli


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Keith Keller
On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:

 With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
 more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...

Could switch to a different console and bounce on top, if you're
interested.

512MB seems really small these days, so I'm guessing you're using this
as a small appliance box like a NAT router.  Is there a reason you
prefer CentOS over a distro targeted to your application?  If it's a NAT
router, for example, there are a bunch of slim-profile distros which are
designed specifically for NAT routing on a small system.

--keith

-- 
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:08:18 -0700
Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:

 On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
 
  With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
  more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...
 
 Could switch to a different console and bounce on top, if you're
 interested.
 
 512MB seems really small these days, so I'm guessing you're using this
 as a small appliance box like a NAT router. 

No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.

 Is there a reason you
 prefer CentOS over a distro targeted to your application?

I don't see a reason, why I should have a zoo of distros. A productive
basic installation of CentOS 7 needs ~ 100 MB RAM. Why the installation
needs more than 5 times that is really interesting question.

Best Regards
Oli


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread John R Pierce

On 9/7/2014 11:31 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:

No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.


a $50 beaglebone black has 512MB ram, and is best run with ucLinux and 
busybox.


That is not the target market of RHEL7 and therefore CentOS 7.

--
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:38:36 -0700
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:

 On 9/7/2014 11:31 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
  No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
  doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.
 
 a $50 beaglebone black has 512MB ram, and is best run with ucLinux
 and busybox.
 
 That is not the target market of RHEL7 and therefore CentOS 7.

If you have 1.000 or 10.000 machines it *is* a reason to
think about every fucking dollar per machine you can save each month.

And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM, only the installer is
br0ken. Is it a java installer? *g*

Best Regards
Oli


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread John R Pierce

On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:

And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM


https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for x86_64.



--
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Steven Stern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/07/2014 01:31 PM, Oliver Schad wrote:
 On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:08:18 -0700
 Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
 
 On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:

 With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
 more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...

 Could switch to a different console and bounce on top, if you're
 interested.

 512MB seems really small these days, so I'm guessing you're using this
 as a small appliance box like a NAT router. 
 
 No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
 doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.
 
 Is there a reason you
 prefer CentOS over a distro targeted to your application?
 
 I don't see a reason, why I should have a zoo of distros. A productive
 basic installation of CentOS 7 needs ~ 100 MB RAM. Why the installation
 needs more than 5 times that is really interesting question.
 
 Best Regards
 Oli
 
As soon as you throw in a web server and/or MySQL, you need more.  The
RAM is really defined by what the system is going to be doing.


- -- 
- -- Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUDKmqAAoJEDx7wfUw/4IOiHEIAMOQLruNhzvZBrlc11VGoZr3
oSMXct9ihuVngPsRlJcdBLxrgmRKVDJIah+qycvEzOrk4E7gNdVtqUVQ/TMLpgHk
0izYrZfIzbJ+ArvBxY53Hb0KJ+QGdr9wgT3FiolZ8li7uS4TflzxTgPmom4xmEn2
itV9AFCtFKjAK3zRNBenRUFLbMaqNQKYLSS9IHwwSq1eswHMleK4YdQzoT93NOBz
cH1IRwjGHfLI7VBciHZiQ/YuIWOngS941uR4OrLc/RrnrP54+Xa4sPB3wFcKTUHP
GcTUbR+K2DpFonAF6hO0pjc8YXK/v2Q0zRgn49gy6Ifo2Aq2uN2pTKWYVHdLnP8=
=mSeA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:

 On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
  And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
 
 https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
 x86_64.

It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about
ressources, even in a linux distro with long term support and
enterprise features.

Enterprise doesn't mean waste your money. And really, to double the
memory to install a machine - are you kidding me? They've never thought
about it and I really hate this attitude.

Best Regards
Oli


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Valeri Galtsev

On Sun, September 7, 2014 1:08 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
 On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:

 With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
 more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...

Interestingly: I just looked up FreeBSD 64 bit (amd64 they call what Linux
calls x86_64) installation requirements: you need at least 64 MB of RAM
for installation ;-)  Of course, you will need _much_ more just to run
Xwindow system on that box...

Somehow it comes to my mind what someone called M$ Windows somewhere
around Windows XP: bloated pig ;-)


 Could switch to a different console and bounce on top, if you're
 interested.

 512MB seems really small these days, so I'm guessing you're using this
 as a small appliance box like a NAT router.  Is there a reason you
 prefer CentOS over a distro targeted to your application?  If it's a NAT
 router, for example, there are a bunch of slim-profile distros which are
 designed specifically for NAT routing on a small system.

 --keith

 --
 kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Mike Burger

On 2014-09-07 2:56 pm, Oliver Schad wrote:

On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:


On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
 And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM

https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
x86_64.


It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about
ressources, even in a linux distro with long term support and
enterprise features.

Enterprise doesn't mean waste your money. And really, to double the
memory to install a machine - are you kidding me? They've never thought
about it and I really hate this attitude.

Best Regards
Oli


Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the 
CentOS packagers, you might wish to vent at the Upstream...because, when 
all is said and done, CentOS is a repackaged RHEL. Whatever the 
requirements are for the upstream are the requirements for CentOS. 
Whatever the installer looks for in RHEL is going to be the same thing 
that the installer looks for in CentOS.


I will leave you with this minor piece of wisdome, which I've seen 
repeated in this list many times: if you don't agree with the 
requirements or feel that there's a bug in the installer, you are more 
than welcome to file a bug report with the upstream.

--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever 
just stops by to say 'hi' anymore. --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 15:04:12 -0400
Mike Burger mbur...@bubbanfriends.org wrote:

 Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the 
 CentOS packagers

My first statement was a simple FYI so that you know this requirement
during installation.

I found one problem with the initramfs file which has 300 MB in a
tmpfs. The rest of the memory is used by processes, round about 300 MB.

tmpfs: /run/, 311 MB used

Anaconda is fat with ~ 200 MB, rest are our best friends, systemd,
polkit and other new bloat.

Best Regards
Oli


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200
Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:

 tmpfs: /run/, 311 MB used

That is really funny: inside of this ramdisk is a tmp dir, with 279 MB
inside, where the biggest part is the squashfs image and some files
which are generated after start of installation.

├── curl_fetch_url0
├── curl_fetch_url1
│   └── squashfs.img
├── curl_fetch_url2
├── curl_fetch_url3
├── dhclient.eth0.dhcpopts
├── dhclient.eth0.lease
├── dhclient.eth0.pid
├── F3ilzP-ks.cfg
├── ifcfg
│   └── ifcfg-eth0
├── ifcfg-leases
│   └── dhclient-fb2320f7-4d9f-417f-ad33-33105024ca08-eth0.lease
├── ks.cfg
├── ks.cfg.done
├── ks.info
├── net.52:54:00:7b:80:c7.did-setup
├── net.eth0.dhcpopts
├── net.eth0.did-setup
├── net.eth0.gw
├── net.eth0.hostname
├── net.eth0.hwaddr
├── net.eth0.lease
├── net.eth0.manualup
├── net.eth0.pid
├── net.eth0.resolv.conf
├── net.eth0.up
├── net.ifaces
└── net.lo.manualup

That means that the squashfs is packed inside a initramfs during
installation? I don't get the idea because we *have* a running system
with a initramfs, that is the primer for the whole boot.

Best Regards
Oli


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread John R Pierce

On 9/7/2014 11:56 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:

On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com  wrote:


On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:

 And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM


https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits  says 1GB minimum for
x86_64.

It doesn't matter what it says.


Take it up with Red Hat.They state it requires 1GB, that was their 
choice.it installs in 1GB just fine.




--
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Oliver Schad
Ok, final result: deleting the initramfs files results in a clean
installation. So we waste ~300 MB RAM during installation with a file
nobody needs. Great.

Best Regards
Oli

On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:45:40 +0200
Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:

 On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200
 Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
 
  tmpfs: /run/, 311 MB used
 
 That is really funny: inside of this ramdisk is a tmp dir, with 279 MB
 inside, where the biggest part is the squashfs image and some files
 which are generated after start of installation.
 
 ├── curl_fetch_url0
 ├── curl_fetch_url1
 │   └── squashfs.img
 ├── curl_fetch_url2
 ├── curl_fetch_url3
 ├── dhclient.eth0.dhcpopts
 ├── dhclient.eth0.lease
 ├── dhclient.eth0.pid
 ├── F3ilzP-ks.cfg
 ├── ifcfg
 │   └── ifcfg-eth0
 ├── ifcfg-leases
 │   └── dhclient-fb2320f7-4d9f-417f-ad33-33105024ca08-eth0.lease
 ├── ks.cfg
 ├── ks.cfg.done
 ├── ks.info
 ├── net.52:54:00:7b:80:c7.did-setup
 ├── net.eth0.dhcpopts
 ├── net.eth0.did-setup
 ├── net.eth0.gw
 ├── net.eth0.hostname
 ├── net.eth0.hwaddr
 ├── net.eth0.lease
 ├── net.eth0.manualup
 ├── net.eth0.pid
 ├── net.eth0.resolv.conf
 ├── net.eth0.up
 ├── net.ifaces
 └── net.lo.manualup
 
 That means that the squashfs is packed inside a initramfs during
 installation? I don't get the idea because we *have* a running system
 with a initramfs, that is the primer for the whole boot.
 
 Best Regards
 Oli



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Valeri Galtsev

On Sun, September 7, 2014 2:04 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
 On 2014-09-07 2:56 pm, Oliver Schad wrote:
 On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:

 On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
  And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM

 https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
 x86_64.

 It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about
 ressources, even in a linux distro with long term support and
 enterprise features.

 Enterprise doesn't mean waste your money. And really, to double the
 memory to install a machine - are you kidding me? They've never thought
 about it and I really hate this attitude.

 Best Regards
 Oli

 Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the
 CentOS packagers, you might wish to vent at the Upstream...

I wouldn't even do that, because what they do they do for their customers,
right?

Valeri

 because, when
 all is said and done, CentOS is a repackaged RHEL. Whatever the
 requirements are for the upstream are the requirements for CentOS.
 Whatever the installer looks for in RHEL is going to be the same thing
 that the installer looks for in CentOS.

 I will leave you with this minor piece of wisdome, which I've seen
 repeated in this list many times: if you don't agree with the
 requirements or feel that there's a bug in the installer, you are more
 than welcome to file a bug report with the upstream.
 --
 Mike Burger
 http://www.bubbanfriends.org

 It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever
 just stops by to say 'hi' anymore. --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
John R Pierce wrote:
 On 9/7/2014 11:56 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
 On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
 John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com  wrote:

 On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
  And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
 
 https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits  says 1GB minimum for
 x86_64.
 It doesn't matter what it says.
 
 Take it up with Red Hat.They state it requires 1GB, that was their
 choice.it installs in 1GB just fine.

In my experience with the installation of Fedora 19/20 (same sort of
anaconda installator, F19 has v19.30.13, F20 v20.25.16, Centos 7 has
v19.31.79), RAM requirements also depend on the number of packages
and their size. On some slightly larger installation (kickstart
install from 8 repositories with over 5 RPMs, 3600+ packages was
installed, highest rpm package file had over 200 MB in size) was
1.5 GB RAM insufficient, with 2 GB RAM installation was successful.

Franta Hanzlik

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Mike Burger mbur...@bubbanfriends.org wrote:

 Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the CentOS
 packagers, you might wish to vent at the Upstream...because, when all is
 said and done, CentOS is a repackaged RHEL. Whatever the requirements are
 for the upstream are the requirements for CentOS. Whatever the installer
 looks for in RHEL is going to be the same thing that the installer looks for
 in CentOS.

Well they did have the opportunity to make changes in the minimal iso
since that doesn't directly correspond to a RHEL version.   I haven't
used it yet because I already had the dvd downloaded, but if you have
reasonable internet bandwidth, I think a minimal initial install makes
sense, followed by telling yum to install whatever else you might need
since there's a good change you'll download them as updates anyway.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread John R Pierce

On 9/7/2014 3:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:

Well they did have the opportunity to make changes in the minimal iso
since that doesn't directly correspond to a RHEL version.   I haven't
used it yet because I already had the dvd downloaded, but if you have
reasonable internet bandwidth, I think a minimal initial install makes
sense, followed by telling yum to install whatever else you might need
since there's a good change you'll download them as updates anyway.


the RPMs are all the same RPMs.   they woudl have had to build a 
completely new installer rather than just a kickstart that specifies the 
minimum packages


--
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
 On 9/7/2014 3:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:

 Well they did have the opportunity to make changes in the minimal iso
 since that doesn't directly correspond to a RHEL version.   I haven't
 used it yet because I already had the dvd downloaded, but if you have
 reasonable internet bandwidth, I think a minimal initial install makes
 sense, followed by telling yum to install whatever else you might need
 since there's a good change you'll download them as updates anyway.


 the RPMs are all the same RPMs.   they woudl have had to build a completely
 new installer rather than just a kickstart that specifies the minimum
 packages

It might be possible to trim the size of the ramdisk that is a large
part of the requirement.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Always Learning

On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 14:00 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:

 Somehow it comes to my mind what someone called M$ Windows somewhere
 around Windows XP: bloated pig ;-)

Starting with Windoze 95, it has been bloatware.



-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.

   Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
   Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Sep 7, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
 And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM, only the installer is
 br0ken. Is it a java installer? *g*

The installer (anaconda) is written in python.  The memory limit is hard-coded 
into the installer, not based on how much memory the installer needs (although 
the limits for the GUI installer is more than the non-GUI, iirc).

--
Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Michael Hennebry

How much memory does it take to run and install from a live CD?

What about a clone of a partition that has CentOS installed?

--
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical
reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young
goat to your SCSI chain now and then.   --   John Woods
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Mark LaPierre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 09/07/14 16:06, Oliver Schad wrote:
 Ok, final result: deleting the initramfs files results in a clean 
 installation. So we waste ~300 MB RAM during installation with a
 file nobody needs. Great.
 
 Best Regards Oli
 
 On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:45:40 +0200 Oliver Schad
 cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
 
 On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200 Oliver Schad
 cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
 
 tmpfs: /run/, 311 MB used
 
 That is really funny: inside of this ramdisk is a tmp dir, with
 279 MB inside, where the biggest part is the squashfs image and
 some files which are generated after start of installation.
 
 ├── curl_fetch_url0 ├── curl_fetch_url1 │   └── squashfs.img ├──
 curl_fetch_url2 ├── curl_fetch_url3 ├── dhclient.eth0.dhcpopts 
 ├── dhclient.eth0.lease ├── dhclient.eth0.pid ├── F3ilzP-ks.cfg 
 ├── ifcfg │   └── ifcfg-eth0 ├── ifcfg-leases │   └──
 dhclient-fb2320f7-4d9f-417f-ad33-33105024ca08-eth0.lease ├──
 ks.cfg ├── ks.cfg.done ├── ks.info ├──
 net.52:54:00:7b:80:c7.did-setup ├── net.eth0.dhcpopts ├──
 net.eth0.did-setup ├── net.eth0.gw ├── net.eth0.hostname ├──
 net.eth0.hwaddr ├── net.eth0.lease ├── net.eth0.manualup ├──
 net.eth0.pid ├── net.eth0.resolv.conf ├── net.eth0.up ├──
 net.ifaces └── net.lo.manualup
 
 That means that the squashfs is packed inside a initramfs during 
 installation? I don't get the idea because we *have* a running
 system with a initramfs, that is the primer for the whole boot.
 
 Best Regards Oli
 
 

Sounds like you've figured out exactly what to write in your bug
report to the upstream.

On another slant, why don't you consider increasing the RAM to 1G,
making the install, then cloning the disk on the other 9.999 machines?



- -- 
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUDQgGAAoJEOKvcl2cb48HMGQIAKEzXhDEaE6ZJD4X7VWbFDJ8
+ovj48fJh9OId2tJeZIK9+1GDiN4mcWQuC0YcHdedhZvLTNivynvyllbaON3+PJe
1fs+XnqYoodIK7ISEe4mwTM6CCp657LG1e24wrddaYdLopBtHRpGIC2glV4mQypW
FV86P/56DMoG6YC9mOHhDMBj+DKGPwFNiYFDawX9Ml6d8pBrDuBTnU/0tnmYg0Vm
+tzd23wOPM9z8vI8I1AYKyAM1k7bJ1qG9YuFmG4JNwVIpJlAI5kB5wxGotMyZrk3
n/pzNV7plSB1VhfW3h535Tc9aYJpmzM/OGtWy7oOuR9VoyW2QpxytM2ABlJGzKc=
=bELI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7

2014-09-07 Thread Keith Keller
On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:

 I don't see a reason, why I should have a zoo of distros. A productive
 basic installation of CentOS 7 needs ~ 100 MB RAM. Why the installation
 needs more than 5 times that is really interesting question.

Are you volunteering to organize a SIG around low-memory installations?

--keith

-- 
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos