Re: [CentOS] ldap, 2.3 primary, 2.4 secondary

2012-04-25 Thread aurfalien

On Apr 24, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Craig White wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:40 -0400, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP 
>> secondary?
>> 
>> Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote 
>> facility to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
>> 
>> Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to.
>> 
>> My LDAP secondaries pull the DB over pretty frequently  so I would be doing 
>> the same thing here.
>> 
>> I would have asked the OpenLDAP list but you are much nicer to an order of 
>> magnitude, seriously.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
> 
> wouldn't do a bit of good to ask openldap list - they'll just tell you
> that 2.3.x is EOL
> 
> Shouldn't have any problems but I haven't tried it myself. There have
> been some issues with replication with 2.3/2.4 but I would suspect that
> if you haven't run into them with 2.3, then you're not running an overly
> complicated setup and it should work.
> 
> Craig
> 


Thanks for the reply Craig.

I had some wanky issues so for now I am running two VMs, one of Centos 5 and 
the other of 6 so that when ready, I can easily migrate.

I am hoping OpenLDAP 2.4 will push rather then pull changes.

- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ldap, 2.3 primary, 2.4 secondary

2012-04-24 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:40 -0400, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP 
> secondary?
> 
> Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility 
> to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
> 
> Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to.
> 
> My LDAP secondaries pull the DB over pretty frequently  so I would be doing 
> the same thing here.
> 
> I would have asked the OpenLDAP list but you are much nicer to an order of 
> magnitude, seriously.
> 
> Thanks in advance,

wouldn't do a bit of good to ask openldap list - they'll just tell you
that 2.3.x is EOL

Shouldn't have any problems but I haven't tried it myself. There have
been some issues with replication with 2.3/2.4 but I would suspect that
if you haven't run into them with 2.3, then you're not running an overly
complicated setup and it should work.

Craig



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos