Re: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> Well, cause I don't need the router if I go directly to the NT machine (I've
> got a hub too).  So the doubling up adds 1 more layer to be broken thru?  So
> you route LAN through router into Server and out of Server to hub?

Hub? LAN? WAN? Router? Firewall? How about some ASCII art?

Jochem

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193888
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
With a hardware firewall to be extra safe.



-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 February 2005 16:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Firewall question

Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> LOL. So both can be equally secure?

Yes, they can be equally secure. But why not run one on both?

Jochem



~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193881
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Well, cause I don't need the router if I go directly to the NT machine (I've
got a hub too).  So the doubling up adds 1 more layer to be broken thru?  So
you route LAN through router into Server and out of Server to hub?

Andy

-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten

Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> LOL. So both can be equally secure?

Yes, they can be equally secure. But why not run one on both?

Jochem



~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193877
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> LOL. So both can be equally secure?

Yes, they can be equally secure. But why not run one on both?

Jochem

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193873
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Andy Ousterhout
LOL. So both can be equally secure?

-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Firewall question


Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> Which is more secure:  Running your firewall on the NT 2003 Server or
running
> it on a router?

Both.

Jochem



~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193871
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> Which is more secure:  Running your firewall on the NT 2003 Server or running
> it on a router?

Both.

Jochem

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193868
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54