[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-08 Thread via cfe-commits

github-actions[bot] wrote:



@Zentrik Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the 
LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then 
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with 
a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as
the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your
change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or
infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail 
[here](https://llvm.org/docs/MyFirstTypoFix.html#myfirsttypofix-issues-after-landing-your-pr).

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it 
yourself.
This is a normal part of [LLVM 
development](https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy).
 You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are 
working as expected, well done!


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-08 Thread via cfe-commits

cor3ntin wrote:

Thanks!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-08 Thread via cfe-commits

https://github.com/cor3ntin closed 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-08 Thread via cfe-commits

https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-05 Thread Balazs Benics via cfe-commits

https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-05 Thread via cfe-commits

llvmbot wrote:



@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: None (Zentrik)


Changes



---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp 
(+1-1) 
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp (+1-1) 


``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp 
b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
index 6cc88679458140..845a5f9b390dc4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 // was not consciously intended, and therefore it might have been unreachable.
 //
 // This checker uses eval::Call for modeling pure functions (functions without
-// side effets), for which their `Summary' is a precise model. This avoids
+// side effects), for which their `Summary' is a precise model. This avoids
 // unnecessary invalidation passes. Conflicts with other checkers are unlikely
 // because if the function has no other effects, other checkers would probably
 // never want to improve upon the modeling done by this checker.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
index 9caaf720ec9138..056be8629b9617 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
@@ -4019,7 +4019,7 @@ bool NewGVN::eliminateInstructions(Function ) {
   // dominated defs as dead.
   if (Def) {
 // For anything in this case, what and how we value number
-// guarantees that any side-effets that would have occurred (ie
+// guarantees that any side-effects that would have occurred (ie
 // throwing, etc) can be proven to either still occur (because it's
 // dominated by something that has the same side-effects), or never
 // occur.  Otherwise, we would not have been able to prove it value

``




https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-05 Thread via cfe-commits

github-actions[bot] wrote:



Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this 
page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write
permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by
name in a comment by using `@` followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review
by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate
is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from 
other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the [LLVM GitHub User 
Guide](https://llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html).

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the [LLVM 
Discord](https://discord.com/invite/xS7Z362) or on the 
[forums](https://discourse.llvm.org/).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[clang] [llvm] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects (PR #87795)

2024-04-05 Thread via cfe-commits

https://github.com/Zentrik created 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87795

None

>From c067d930da4acd393c64e22abf71e13fbfb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zentrik 
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:39:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] Fix misspellings of effects

---
 .../lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp  | 2 +-
 llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp 
b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
index 6cc88679458140..845a5f9b390dc4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 // was not consciously intended, and therefore it might have been unreachable.
 //
 // This checker uses eval::Call for modeling pure functions (functions without
-// side effets), for which their `Summary' is a precise model. This avoids
+// side effects), for which their `Summary' is a precise model. This avoids
 // unnecessary invalidation passes. Conflicts with other checkers are unlikely
 // because if the function has no other effects, other checkers would probably
 // never want to improve upon the modeling done by this checker.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
index 9caaf720ec9138..056be8629b9617 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
@@ -4019,7 +4019,7 @@ bool NewGVN::eliminateInstructions(Function ) {
   // dominated defs as dead.
   if (Def) {
 // For anything in this case, what and how we value number
-// guarantees that any side-effets that would have occurred (ie
+// guarantees that any side-effects that would have occurred (ie
 // throwing, etc) can be proven to either still occur (because it's
 // dominated by something that has the same side-effects), or never
 // occur.  Otherwise, we would not have been able to prove it value

___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits