Re: [CinCVS] rendering to h.264 broken: no ratecontrol method specified
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 22:21 +0100, Paul de Vries wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep x264 x264-0.0.0-0.3.20070529.fc7 x264-devel-0.0.0-0.3.20070529.fc7 x264 [error]: no ratecontrol method specified --- Package x264.x86_64 0:0-0.8.20061028.lvn7 set to be updated --- Package x264-devel.x86_64 0:0-0.8.20061028.lvn7 set to be updated Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Installing: x264 x86_64 0-0.8.20061028.lvn7 livna 227 k x264-devel x86_64 0-0.8.20061028.lvn7 livna 15 k I am now able to use ffmpeg or avidemux to render to h264 format. Great! The real reason for the rate control error is that the newer version of the x264 library now expects a value for rate control. With the older version, if none was given x264 would take a default (cqp=26). Therefore it is actually a bug in cinelerra, which does not provide a value for the rate control. From the x264 changelog: Changes from rev. 654 to rev. 655 * require a ratecontrol method to be specified, it no longer defaults to cqp=26. Paul Thanks Paul, Do you think that fixing the Cinelerra codebase (probably /hvirtual/quicktime/ffmpeg/libavcodec/x264.c) to include the ratecontrol method would fix the latest error? x264 [error]: invalid width x height (0x720) scott ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] Lumierra com and org
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Odin Omdal Hørthe wrote: I don't like the name Lumierra nor Luminerra, -- it's the erra-part I don't like. If we'll go that route I would much prefer Luminera, og Lumiera. (Or no r's: Luminea -- but that sounds like a lubricator) I think it'd be nice for the name to be as far away from Cinelerra as possible, but Lumierra has the advantage of sounding like Lumière, as in the Lumière brothers, cinema pioneers. I like that and would vote for Lumierra in preference to any of the other names I've seen suggested so far. Adding an n or removing all the rs breaks that. Removing just one r, for Lumiera, might be best - then it makes the resemblance to Lumière a little stronger and moves it further away from Cinelerra. -- Matthew Skala [EMAIL PROTECTED]Embrace and defend. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ ___ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Re: [CinCVS] Lumierra com and org
At any rate, let us in the end all agree with whatever name emerges. -- Regards, Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IT: http://methodsupport.com Personal: http://thereisnoend.org
