Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]
The first CCIE get #1024 not #1. That might explain why yours is #6969 Regards, Ronny - Original Message - From: "Allen May" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:35 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545] > I'm holding out for #6969 > > - Original Message - > From: "Justin Emilio" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:10 PM > Subject: Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545] > > > > Currently cisco claims that there are 6169 CCIEs according to their > website: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > > > > Justin Emilio > > Tech Support > > CCNP, CCDP, CSE > > MM Internet 888-654-4971 > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Leonardo Borda" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:17 AM > > Subject: CCIE Expertises [7:13545] > > > > > > > Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the world? > > > Does cisco publish that information? > > > > > > Leonardo Borda Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13695&t=13545 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
This information is very interesting ... May I know where you get this information ? Is it reliable Regards, Ronny - Original Message - From: "cheekin" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:32 PM Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477] > FYI. Breakdown by certification through May 2001 > > US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan > CCIE 2,876 1,940 755 135 267 > CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972 23,689 > CCNP20,7789,633 9,244 40723,689 > CCDA14,8256,580 3,705 6521,038 > CCDP4,264 3,911 1,449 94 245 > > cheekin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13490&t=13477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ICMP type 3 code ?????????? [7:7697]
Hi Chris, The ICMP code 13 means communication administratively prohibited (e.g. firewall blocked) For your case I think it was due to the access list. Other ICMP code: 0 - network unreachable 1 - host unreachable 2 - protocol unreachable 3 - fragmentation needed and the do=not-fragment bit set 5 - source route failed 7 - destination host unknown 11 - network unreachable for type of service (TOP) 12 - host unreachable for type of service 13 - communicaton administratively prohibited (e.g. firewall blocked) 14 - host precedence violation 15 - precedence cut-off in effect You can find more detail information from the following document in Chapter 2 Section 4 which covers ICMP in detail: http://www.ireste.fr/fdl/ars/rpoly/pdf/s_serv2.pdf Regards, Ronny CCNP - Original Message - From: Burnham, Chris To: Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 6:41 PM Subject: ICMP type 3 code ?? [7:7697] > Question guys, > I have received the following back from a ciso router that I > do not have control over. ICMP type 3 code 0xd. > hex d = decimal 13. This code value 13 doesn't exist. Is this due to an > inbound access-list? any ideas? Look at the packet debug below and let me > know your opinions. > > -- IP -- > 192.168.240.2 ==> 10.108.226.7 > > ver = 0x4 hlen = 0x5 tos = 0x0 tlen = 0x38 > id = 0x739d flags = 0x0 frag off=0x0 > ttl = 0xfe proto=0x1 chksum = 0xac08 > > -- ICMP -- > type = 0x3 code = 0xd checksum=0xf5a0 > identifier = 0x0seq = 0x0 > -- DATA -- > 001c: 45 00 00 54 b0 07 40 00 fc 01 d5 d6 0a 6c e2 07 | > E..T..@..l.. > 002c: 0a d0 01 87 08 00 c9 b0 35 a1 00 00 22 | > 5..." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7704&t=7697 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CIT - Now a CCNP!! [7:6725]
Hi Andrew, Congratulation for you success. I am going to go for CIT next week. Do you have any tips and suggestion about the exam ? Regards, Ronny - Original Message - From: Andrew Larkins To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: Passed CIT - Now a CCNP!! [7:6725] > I passed my final exam yesterday - CIT with a score of 919. > At last I have my CCNP. > > Many thanks to everyone on this list for all the informative threads and > help with problems I have had over this pass period. > > Now to do my CCDP and security specialisation - anyone have any tips for > these > > Thanks again > > > Andrew Larkins > BCom, CCNP, CCDA > Bytes Technology Group Limited > Tel : +27 11 800 9467 > Fax : +27 11 800 9496 > Mobile : +27 83 656 7214 > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6728&t=6725 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written [7:5225]
> Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA Wow ! what a score ... Can you share with us what tips and book you use to prepare for CCIE written ? Regards, Ronny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5233&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple ISDN switch type on the same router [7:5198]
> Group, > > I got concrete information that if you have multiple bri interfaces on the > router, all of them must be connected to > the same ISDN switch type. How about if you have a router with multiple PRI > interfaces? Should I connect all the PRI interfaces to the same ISDN switch > type? It is not neccessary to connect all the BRI/PRI interfaces to the same ISDN switch. You can configure the ISDN switch type per interface under interface configuration mode. Regards, Ronny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5206&t=5198 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple ISDN switch type on the same router [7:5198]
> Group, > > Is the dialer-group command on the BRI interface optional. In other words > will the router dial if no dialer-group is configured on the bri interface? It depend on how you want to configure your BRI interface. Say you want to configure it as a DDR (Dial on Demand Routing), than the dialer-group command is a must. But if you configure it as a backup interface (using the backup command) than it is not needed to use the dialer-group command Regards, Ronny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5201&t=5198 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dialer-group command [7:5199]
> Group, > > Is the dialer-group command on the BRI interface optional. In other words > will the router dial if no dialer-group is configured on the bri interface? It depend on how you want to configure your BRI interface. Say you want to configure it as a DDR (Dial on Demand Routing), than the dialer-group command is a must. But if you configure it as a backup interface (using the backup command) than it is not needed to use the dialer-group command Regards, Ronny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5202&t=5199 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Show log command in switch [7:4138]
Hi, I'm not a guru, but try show logging buffer Regards, Ronny --- Cisco Newbie wrote: > All Guru, > > I would like to know is there any similiar command > in Cisco switch(C4006) > that allow us to "show log"? Just like the one in > router... > > If not, is there a way to retreive history log in a > Cisco switch?...Thanx. > > Newbie > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4153&t=4138 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]
- Original Message - From: Mr. Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA To: Ronny Jonathan Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360] > Me think since MLS has to do with layer 2 up to layer 4. We know that layer > 4 has ports numbers and all that. Ordinary if the ports numbers at layer 4 > at not made used of, MLS has not been accomplished. Access-list or something > have to be configured so that layer 4 element are used in the decision > making. Since this is the basic defination of MLS, it then means Flow mask > is an additional thing. > > I agree with what the cisco press book said, if you say > set mls flow destination > (only destination informations will be kept in the mls cache) > or if you say > set mls flow destination-source > (both source and destination ip-addresses will be kept in the mls cache) > better stil > set mls flow full > (All informations including port numbers will be documented in the cache) > > Good luck, > (Also preparing for BCMSN) > > my 2 cents. > Oletu > > > > - Original Message - > From: Ronny Jonathan > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 12:10 PM > Subject: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360] > > > > Hi All, > > > > In BCMSN course book (Cisco Press) p233, it is stated that: > > "Most Cisco documentation explains flow masks as a way to determine how > > packets are compared to entries in the MLS cache. This is inaccurate. Flow > > masks are actually used to determine how much information about the packet > is > > placed in the MLS cache. The flow mask is not used to compare packets to > > existing entries in the MLS cache" > > > > But from another source (Boson & Cisco Doc): > > "you are introducing policy based routing and want to route differently > based > > on source, destination, and port number. What command would you use on a > > multi-level switch to make it consider port numbers when layer 3 > forwarding ? > > the correct syntax is: set mls flow [destination|destination-source|full]. > > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/layer3/m > l > > s.htm#xtocidll0l940" > > > > So the command "set mls flow ...", is it only to determine what > information > > to > > be kept in the mls entry or is it meant to enforce so that all packets > going > > through the L3 switch will be compared to the mls entry according to the > flow > > mask that has been set up by the "set mls flow" command ? > > > > Thanks in advance for the answer, I need it for BCMSN exam on Wednesday. > > > > Regards, > > Ronny > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3439&t=3360 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]
First, thanks for your answer Drew ... but I'm still confused ... > It determines what information > is stored in the mls entry and enforces all packets > coming through the mls > switch to be compared with the entry according to > the flow mask specified > with set mls flow. How about the note in the BCMSN course book. My interpretation for the note is: The "set mls flow" is to determine what information to be stored in the mls entry (for statistic and data collection purpose), but NOT to enforce packets that go through the mls switch to be compared with the mls entry according to the flow mask specified by the command. > By the way, there is a difference between an L3 > switch and an mls-capable > switch. Make sure you don't get those confused. What is the different ? Are you referring to the RSM/RSFC/MSM/MSFC (MLS-RP) for the layer 3 switch and Cat 5000/6000(MLS-SE) for the mls-capable switch ? Regards, Ronny __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3378&t=3360 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]
Hi All, In BCMSN course book (Cisco Press) p233, it is stated that: "Most Cisco documentation explains flow masks as a way to determine how packets are compared to entries in the MLS cache. This is inaccurate. Flow masks are actually used to determine how much information about the packet is placed in the MLS cache. The flow mask is not used to compare packets to existing entries in the MLS cache" But from another source (Boson & Cisco Doc): "you are introducing policy based routing and want to route differently based on source, destination, and port number. What command would you use on a multi-level switch to make it consider port numbers when layer 3 forwarding ? the correct syntax is: set mls flow [destination|destination-source|full]. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/layer3/ml s.htm#xtocidll0l940" So the command "set mls flow ...", is it only to determine what information to be kept in the mls entry or is it meant to enforce so that all packets going through the L3 switch will be compared to the mls entry according to the flow mask that has been set up by the "set mls flow" command ? Thanks in advance for the answer, I need it for BCMSN exam on Wednesday. Regards, Ronny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3360&t=3360 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
