Re: network design question [7:52762]

2002-09-09 Thread Jeff D

Intermediate Distribution Facility.

Usually where your Access Layer switches reside.

Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Tunji Suleiman" 
To: ; 
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:02 AM
Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762]


> Hi Jeff Duchin, pls what's IDF?
>
> Regards
>
>
> >From: "Jeff D" 
> >Reply-To: "Jeff D" 
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762]
> >Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:11:16 GMT
> >
> >How many users per IDF?
> >
> >Jeff
> >
> >""John Brandis""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports.
> >Hoever,
> > > like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and
to
> > > plan for VOIP in a few months time.
> > >
> > > My topology looked like
> > >
> > > [Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006]
> > > / \ /
> > > \
> > >/  \/
> > > \
> > >   /   \   /
> > > \
> > > [Cat2950][Cat2950]
> > > [Cat2950][cat2950] and would extend out another level
> > >
> > > That kind of worked for 460 ports:
> > >
> > > Would this design work:
> > >
> > > [---Core Switch -
> > > Cisco Catalyst 4006-] Floor
Closet-Level
> >3
> > > (core room)
> > > / \ /
> > > \
> > >   /  \/
> > > \
> > > /  \   /
> > > \
> > >   [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
> > > [Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
> > >
> > > Floor Closet-Level 1
> > > Floor Closet-Level 2
> > >
> > > All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core
> >4006.
> > > The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC
port.
> > > Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be
> >better
> > > just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ?
> > >
> > > Thanks for your time.
> > >
> > > John
> > > Sydney Australia
> > >
> > >
> > > **
> > >
> > > visit http://www.solution6.com
> > >
> > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
> > >
> > > *
> > > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
> > > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you
> >cannot
> > > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case,
> >please
> > > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of
> >the
> > > message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information
in
> > > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official
business
> >of
> > > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> > > *
> _
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52953&t=52762
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: network design question [7:52762]

2002-09-06 Thread Tunji Suleiman

Hi Jeff Duchin, pls what's IDF?

Regards


>From: "Jeff D" 
>Reply-To: "Jeff D" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: network design question [7:52762]
>Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:11:16 GMT
>
>How many users per IDF?
>
>Jeff
>
>""John Brandis""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports.
>Hoever,
> > like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to
> > plan for VOIP in a few months time.
> >
> > My topology looked like
> >
> > [Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006]
> > / \ /
> > \
> >/  \/
> > \
> >   /   \   /
> > \
> > [Cat2950][Cat2950]
> > [Cat2950][cat2950] and would extend out another level
> >
> > That kind of worked for 460 ports:
> >
> > Would this design work:
> >
> > [---Core Switch -
> > Cisco Catalyst 4006-] Floor Closet-Level 
>3
> > (core room)
> > / \ /
> > \
> >   /  \/
> > \
> > /  \   /
> > \
> >   [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
> > [Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
> >
> > Floor Closet-Level 1
> > Floor Closet-Level 2
> >
> > All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core
>4006.
> > The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC port.
> > Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be
>better
> > just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ?
> >
> > Thanks for your time.
> >
> > John
> > Sydney Australia
> >
> >
> > **
> >
> > visit http://www.solution6.com
> >
> > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
> >
> > *
> > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
> > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you
>cannot
> > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case,
>please
> > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of 
>the
> > message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
> > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business
>of
> > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> > *
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52777&t=52762
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: network design question [7:52762]

2002-09-05 Thread Jeff D

How many users per IDF?

Jeff

""John Brandis""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports.
Hoever,
> like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to
> plan for VOIP in a few months time.
>
> My topology looked like
>
> [Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006]
> / \ /
> \
>/  \/
> \
>   /   \   /
> \
> [Cat2950][Cat2950]
> [Cat2950][cat2950] and would extend out another level
>
> That kind of worked for 460 ports:
>
> Would this design work:
>
> [---Core Switch -
> Cisco Catalyst 4006-] Floor Closet-Level 3
> (core room)
> / \ /
> \
>   /  \/
> \
> /  \   /
> \
>   [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
> [Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
>
> Floor Closet-Level 1
> Floor Closet-Level 2
>
> All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core
4006.
> The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC port.
> Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be
better
> just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ?
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> John
> Sydney Australia
>
>
> **
>
> visit http://www.solution6.com
>
> UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
>
> *
> This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
> confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you
cannot
> use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case,
please
> notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
> message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
> this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business
of
> Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> *




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52765&t=52762
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



network design question [7:52762]

2002-09-05 Thread John Brandis

Hi All,

Like my previous emails, had a network designed for some 460 ports. Hoever,
like yesterday, I have been told now to cater for some 650 ports, and to
plan for VOIP in a few months time.

My topology looked like

[Core Switch - Cisco Catalyst 4006]
/   \   /
\
   / \ /
\
  /   \   /
\
[Cat2950][Cat2950]
[Cat2950][cat2950]  and would extend out another level

That kind of worked for 460 ports:

Would this design work:

[---Core Switch -
Cisco Catalyst 4006-]   Floor Closet-Level 3
(core room)
/\  /
\   
  /   \/
\
/  \  /
\
  [Cat2950]--[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]
[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950]---[Cat2950] 

Floor Closet-Level 1
Floor Closet-Level 2

All links back to the core, are fibre connecting to a GBIC on the core 4006.
The link between each cat 2950, is also fibre connecting to a GBIC port.
Would this design work as my core-distribution model, or would it be better
just to have the just 2 switchs at my dist layer ?

Thanks for your time.

John
Sydney Australia


**

visit http://www.solution6.com

UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

*
This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot
use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case, please
notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of
Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
*




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52762&t=52762
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]