[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-15428:

Summary: s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do 
this automatically  (was: s3guard bucket-info -unguarded will guard bucket if 
FS is set to do this automatically)

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Priority: Major
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-12-04 Thread Gabor Bota (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gabor Bota updated HADOOP-15428:

Attachment: HADOOP-15428.001.patch

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Assignee: Gabor Bota
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15428.001.patch
>
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-12-04 Thread Gabor Bota (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gabor Bota updated HADOOP-15428:

Status: Patch Available  (was: In Progress)

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Assignee: Gabor Bota
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15428.001.patch
>
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-12-10 Thread Sean Mackrory (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sean Mackrory updated HADOOP-15428:
---
Release Note: The -unguarded flag, passed to `hadoop s3guard bucket-info` 
will no proceed with S3Guard disabled instead of failing if S3Guard is not 
already disabled.

Committed to trunk. We should relnote this, IMO. Any thoughts on the wording 
[~gabor.bota] or [~ste...@apache.org]?

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Assignee: Gabor Bota
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15428.001.patch
>
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-12-10 Thread Sean Mackrory (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sean Mackrory updated HADOOP-15428:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Assignee: Gabor Bota
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15428.001.patch
>
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-12-12 Thread Sean Mackrory (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sean Mackrory updated HADOOP-15428:
---
Release Note: If -unguarded flag is passed to `hadoop s3guard bucket-info`, 
it will now proceed with S3Guard disabled instead of failing if S3Guard is not 
already disabled.  (was: The -unguarded flag, passed to `hadoop s3guard 
bucket-info` will no proceed with S3Guard disabled instead of failing if 
S3Guard is not already disabled.)

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Assignee: Gabor Bota
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15428.001.patch
>
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-15428) s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this automatically

2018-12-12 Thread Sean Mackrory (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sean Mackrory updated HADOOP-15428:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

> s3guard bucket-info will create s3guard table if FS is set to do this 
> automatically
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: fs/s3
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: Steve Loughran
>Assignee: Gabor Bota
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-15428.001.patch
>
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to 
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically 
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has 
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org