Re: Centralization of graphical awesomeness [ot]
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: with linux i'm not lumping in uclinux, elks, etc. as they do come under different names :) notice.. i included desktop... and at least i'd hope to imply that would be the desktop he speaks of... ie how great compiz is and so much better than e17. :) (just using context). Please don't lock on my comparing E vs. Compiz, it was just an example to show how things could be done in different manner, the same as you don't consider uclinux as linux... I didn't say Compiz is better than E per se, I just said on *my* desktop systems E never run as smooth as you claim (and show on your videos) BUT Compiz do. Given that I don't use compiz because simply I don't need fancy windows to browse the web, developing apps and see movies ;) ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Centralization of graphical awesomeness [ot]
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 02:02 +1100 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: [...] why are you not complaining that linux sucks on an 8086 on your desktop? Because Linux doesn't sucks on an 8086 ;) because Linux is well designed, is scalable, is optimized and can run even on a 8086...Desktop i think you just illustrated my point where i don't think you know what you are talking about. an intel 8086 can't run linux. a linux requires a minimum of an 386 with mmu. the 8086 was a 16bit precursor to it. owned. scnr :) ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Centralization of graphical awesomeness [ot]
2009/10/27 Marcel tan...@googlemail.com Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 02:02 +1100 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: [...] why are you not complaining that linux sucks on an 8086 on your desktop? Because Linux doesn't sucks on an 8086 ;) because Linux is well designed, is scalable, is optimized and can run even on a 8086...Desktop i think you just illustrated my point where i don't think you know what you are talking about. an intel 8086 can't run linux. a linux requires a minimum of an 386 with mmu. the 8086 was a 16bit precursor to it. owned. scnr :) have you googled linux 8086 ? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Centralization of graphical awesomeness [ot]
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:38:28 +0100 Michal Brzozowski ruso...@poczta.fm said: 2009/10/27 Marcel tan...@googlemail.com Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 02:02 +1100 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: [...] why are you not complaining that linux sucks on an 8086 on your desktop? Because Linux doesn't sucks on an 8086 ;) because Linux is well designed, is scalable, is optimized and can run even on a 8086...Desktop i think you just illustrated my point where i don't think you know what you are talking about. an intel 8086 can't run linux. a linux requires a minimum of an 386 with mmu. the 8086 was a 16bit precursor to it. owned. scnr :) have you googled linux 8086 ? with linux i'm not lumping in uclinux, elks, etc. as they do come under different names :) notice.. i included desktop... and at least i'd hope to imply that would be the desktop he speaks of... ie how great compiz is and so much better than e17. :) (just using context). -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
