[Cooker] [Bug 4092] [jpilot] Keyring plugin not included
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-07 16:46 --- Created an attachment (id=534) -- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=534action=view) Output of rpm listfile query on jpilot-0.99.5-1mdk.i586.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: RESOLVED creation_date: description: It would be great if you could include the keyring plugin with the jpilot RPM, or as an additional, optional RPM. The keyring is one of my absolute favorite Palm applications. There would be little additional effort involved, IIUC, because the Keyring sources are included in the jpilot source distribution (indeed, as far as I can tell, we must be going out of our way to get rid of the plugin).
[Cooker] [Bug 4092] [jpilot] Keyring plugin not included
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-07 17:21 --- I'm not entirely sure how this comes to be. I have inspected the contents of jpilot-0.99.5-1mdk.i586.rpm, and no keyring files are contained therein. I am attaching the output of rpm --query --list -p /home/mandrake91/RPMS2/jpilot-0.99.5-1mdk.i586.rpm Other than that, the only jpilot rpms I can find in my list are: jpilot-Mail-0.0.6-7mdk.i586.rpm jpilot-syncmal-0.71-5mdk.i586.rpm Am I overlooking one? If so, I apologize for wasting your time. I am a novice with rpm. Or perhaps all of these plugins are statically linked in the version you distribute. When I built the jpilot system by hand, I found /usr/lib/jpilot, containing the following plugins: [EMAIL PROTECTED] KeyRing]$ ls /usr/lib/jpilot/plugins/ libexpense.lalibkeyring.solibmail.so.0.0.0 libsynctime.so.0 libexpense.solibkeyring.so.0 libsyncmal.la libsynctime.so.0.0.0 libexpense.so.0 libkeyring.so.0.0.0 libsyncmal.so libexpense.so.0.0.0 libmail.so libsynctime.la libkeyring.lalibmail.so.0 libsynctime.so -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: RESOLVED creation_date: description: It would be great if you could include the keyring plugin with the jpilot RPM, or as an additional, optional RPM. The keyring is one of my absolute favorite Palm applications. There would be little additional effort involved, IIUC, because the Keyring sources are included in the jpilot source distribution (indeed, as far as I can tell, we must be going out of our way to get rid of the plugin).
[Cooker] [Bug 4092] [jpilot] Keyring plugin not included
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-07 17:39 --- Thank you for the quick response. Question: is there anything that should be done to make this work more smoothly? I ended up with this version of the jpilot (i.e. main program installed, but library plugins NOT installed), through a text-only (I have NVIDIA graphics card) install of Mandrake 9.1. I'm wondering if anything should be done to ensure that users will get the libjpilot_plugin) package installed when they request jpilot I.e., if this IS a bug (I'm not sure it is), perhaps it's a bug with the install process? Perhaps the install (and upgrade) process(es) should enforce installation of the plugin rpm when one installs the main jpilot rpm? Or perhaps something just went wrong in my install. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: RESOLVED creation_date: description: It would be great if you could include the keyring plugin with the jpilot RPM, or as an additional, optional RPM. The keyring is one of my absolute favorite Palm applications. There would be little additional effort involved, IIUC, because the Keyring sources are included in the jpilot source distribution (indeed, as far as I can tell, we must be going out of our way to get rid of the plugin).
[Cooker] [Bug 3452] [ifplugd] Drakconnect fails Internet connection - Internal Network Access Available
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3452 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-27-06 19:05 --- I can confirm this behavior, having also see it on a Mandrake 9.1 machine Here are relevant lines from the logs: Jun 26 22:19:56 jukebox ifplugd[661]: Warning: Could not get interface address. Jun 26 22:19:56 jukebox ifplugd[661]: Using interface eth0/00:C0:4F:B2:93:FD with driver 3c59x LK1.1.18-ac Jun 26 22:19:56 jukebox ifplugd[661]: ETHTOOL_GLINK failed: Operation not supported Jun 26 22:19:56 jukebox ifplugd[661]: ifplugd 0.13 successfully initialized, link beat not detected. Jun 26 22:19:56 jukebox network: Bringing up interface eth0: failed For me, the solution was to add MII_NOT_SUPPORTED=yes to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 Let me suggest three things that might be done to help this: 1. Improve the documentation. The documentation for ifcfg does not mention MII_NOT_SUPPORTED. This should change. 2. /etc/rc.d/init.d/network currently greps /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-devicename for the above flag. This means that we're violating the announced structure of that file, since we're just looking for a key, instead of loading the file and evaluating the variables. This is probably not a good thing. Can we change how the network script checks for this feature? I realize that loading the ifcfg file might be inconvenient, since the network file maps over all interfaces, but still this approach is no good. Perhaps have a command that will load the file and check the value of this variable (a la is_wireless_interface)? 3. Add something to drakconnect to verify that ifplugd will work on an interface and deactivate it if not. As an aside, I was a little nonplussed to find that removing eth0 from ifplugd.conf had no effect on this problem. I.e., /etc/rc.d/init.d/network and ifplugd can actually be in a state where they disagree about whether or not ifplugd is responsible for a given interface. That's probably not a good thing. This may be more than just a normal severity bug, since you have to be relatively familiar with the networking scripts to work around it. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: UNCONFIRMED creation_date: description: Version - Mandrake 9.1rc2 This bug is similar to bug 2088 and 2932. With two different computers, I can ping and access other computers on the network, but cannot connect to the Internet. The appropriate tool for correction is drakconnect. Mandrake Control Center-Network Internet-Connection. In /var/log/syslog, when trying to run drakconnect, the log file shows: network: Shutting down loopback interface: succeeded network: Setting network parameters: succeeded ifup: RTNETLINK answers: no such device network: Bringing up loopback interface: succeeded ifplugd [9073] Warning: Could not get interface address ifplugd [9073] Using interface eth0/00:01:03:8C:E0:D9 with driver 3c59x LK1.1.18-ac ifplugd [9073] ETHTOOL_GLINK failed: Operation not supported ifplugd [9073] Executing '/etc/ifplugd/ifplugd.action eth0 up'. CROND [9114] (mail) CMD (/usr/bin/python -S /var/lib/mailman/cron/grunner) CROND [9114] (mail) CMD (/usr/bin/python -S /var/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news) dhclient DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 dhclient DHCPACK from 192.168.1.1 dhclient bout to 192.168.1.101 -- renewal in 32953 seconds ifplugd [9073] client: Determining IP information for eth0 ... done. ifplugd [9073] Program executed successfully. network: Bringing up interface eth0: succeeded CROND[9216] (mail) CMD (/usr/bin/python -S /var/lib/mailman/cron/qrunner) CROND[9231] (mail) CMD (/usr/bin/python -S /var/lib/mailman/cron/qrunner) ifplugd [9073] Link beat lost ifplugd [9073] Executing '/etc/ifplugd/ifplugd.action eth0 down'. ifplugd [9073] Program executed successfully. Does it establish a connection at all? - I have two computers, a laptop and a desktop both running Mandrake 9.1rc2. Yesterday, and for a few weeks, the Compaq Presario desktop was connected to the Internet using Mandrake 9.1rc2. Today the desktop will no longer connect to the Internet. Yesterday, I loaded the laptop running Mandrake 9.0, with Mandrake 9.1rc2, and the Dell C600 laptop can no longer connect to the Internet, although both computers can access, and ping other computers running on an internal network. I was able to connect and use a VNC with the Dell C600 laptop running Mandrake 9.1rc2. This bug is limited to establishing an Internet connection. In which situation does it fail? - Currently both my Dell C600 Laptop and on the Compaq Presario 5423 desktop systems fail on every occasion in trying to connect to the Internet. I have tried at least 10 times on both machines, with a variety of
[Cooker] [Bug 3740] [ifplugd] eth1 doesn't come up automatically
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||3452 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-27-06 19:10 --- Added dependency on 3452 --- seems closely related since that's another problem with ifplugd causing network startup to fail. In general what's needed seems to be some facility to recover from ifplugd's failure to commission an interface. It would be nice if drakconnect would notice such problems. It might also be nice to have some kind of network debugging wizard that would help fix such problems. Also, note that if you put MII_NOT_SUPPORTED=0 in the file (or for that matter, ANY value for this flag), /etc/rc.d/init.d/network will treat it the same. See my comments in bug 3452. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: UNCONFIRMED creation_date: description: I have a Xircom Symphony wireless card (unsupported by Mandrake) for eth1. The kernel module gets loaded during the boot (ifconfig eth1 show the interface, but without an IP address), but the network doesn't come up until I enter ifup eth1 at a shell. /var/log/messages shows Apr 12 08:13:24 axon ifplugd[925]: Warning: Could not get interface address. Apr 12 08:13:24 axon ifplugd[925]: Using interface eth1/00:20:A6:36:98:E4 Apr 12 08:13:24 axon ifplugd[925]: ETHTOOL_GLINK failed: Operation not supported Apr 12 08:13:24 axon ifplugd[925]: SIOCGMIIPHY failed: Operation not supported Apr 12 08:13:24 axon ifplugd[925]: ifplugd 0.13 successfully initialized, link beat not detected.
[Cooker] [Bug 4092] [jpilot] New: Keyring plugin not included
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 Product: jpilot Component: program Summary: Keyring plugin not included Product: jpilot Version: 0.99.5-2mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: program AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be great if you could include the keyring plugin with the jpilot RPM, or as an additional, optional RPM. The keyring is one of my absolute favorite Palm applications. There would be little additional effort involved, IIUC, because the Keyring sources are included in the jpilot source distribution (indeed, as far as I can tell, we must be going out of our way to get rid of the plugin). -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
