Re: [Cooker] JDM has changed (IMNSHO) for the worst...
Le Vendredi 31 Janvier 2003 05:06, Gary Greene a écrit : Can some one tell me why it was deemed that the kdm login dialog needed to change to a add-on that isn't in the stock KDE distribution? It looks kinda clumsy from a UI design standpoint. That, and I personally LIKED the stock 3.1 login UI. I second this. There are bugz to be fixed before spending time for cosmetics, or please do it in a separate package... And more : the default action for ENTER KEY is the REBOOT icon !
Re: [Cooker] JDM has changed (IMNSHO) for the worst...
Pascal wrote: Le Vendredi 31 Janvier 2003 05:06, Gary Greene a écrit : Can some one tell me why it was deemed that the kdm login dialog needed to change to a add-on that isn't in the stock KDE distribution? It looks kinda clumsy from a UI design standpoint. That, and I personally LIKED the stock 3.1 login UI. I second this. There are bugz to be fixed before spending time for cosmetics, or please do it in a separate package... And more : the default action for ENTER KEY is the REBOOT icon ! i agree, nice attempt anyhow, but that's really ugly looking!!! If MDK is willing to customize the login manager should think about making it much better than the stock KDE or gnome ones... come on!! This e-mail was scanned by RAV Antivirus. (www.ravantivirus.com)
Re: [Cooker] JDM has changed (IMNSHO) for the worst...
On Friday 31 January 2003 04:06, Gary Greene wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can some one tell me why it was deemed that the kdm login dialog needed to change to a add-on that isn't in the stock KDE distribution? It looks kinda clumsy from a UI design standpoint. That, and I personally LIKED the stock 3.1 login UI. Yeah give us the standard one back, it looks, and functions way better. -- John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] JDM has changed (IMNSHO) for the worst...
On Friday 31 January 2003 05:06, Gary Greene wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can some one tell me why it was deemed that the kdm login dialog needed to change to a add-on that isn't in the stock KDE distribution? It looks kinda clumsy from a UI design standpoint. That, and I personally LIKED the stock 3.1 login UI. - -- Gary L. Greene, Jr. [long .sig snipped] I really feel Mandrake should reconsider this. Not only does the whole thing look amateurish (using 2 steps, bad gui) but it makes the system harder to configure for me (cannot configure anymore from kde). Please use either gdm or kdm, but pick a decent mature option. /start rant Please don't tell me you will be solve the configuration problem by providing one of these taking 30+ seconds to start and badly behaving (e.g. no transparent cut and paste, width does not fit title width etc. etc.) Mandrake control modules. /end rant Thx, John
[Cooker] JDM has changed (IMNSHO) for the worst...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can some one tell me why it was deemed that the kdm login dialog needed to change to a add-on that isn't in the stock KDE distribution? It looks kinda clumsy from a UI design standpoint. That, and I personally LIKED the stock 3.1 login UI. - -- Gary L. Greene, Jr. Sent from uriel.gvsu.edu 23:03:05 up 9 min, 2 users, load average: 0.19, 0.22, 0.17 === Founder and president of GVLUG. PHONE : 331-0562 EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] === -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+OfZTVg8c0/GZcW8RAs50AJ0dMmGX51wii5vfE4Oy4TxdiIFjzQCfURPM SrqKzo4qKOD3rvf4xh30jOQ= =7F4E -END PGP SIGNATURE-
