Re: [Cooker] libtcl.so gone?

[Daouda LO]

Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning?
> 
> [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX
> installing
> 
>/usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> libtcl.so   is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk
> Installation failed
> Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
> [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so
> [root@polop root]#

It's fixed now.
>From changelog

* Thu Feb 28 2002 Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0-0.c17.13mdk

- Don't make BitchX depend on a versionless tcl.

* Wed Feb 27 2002 dam's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0-0.c17.12mdk

- added tcl require

Re: [Cooker] libtcl.so gone?

[Garrick Staples]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:35:01PM -0400, JJ alleged:
> huug wrote:
> > 
> > Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning?
> > >
> > > [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX
> > > installing
> > > 
>/usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm
> > > error: failed dependencies:
> > > libtcl.so   is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk
> > > Installation failed
> > > Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
> > > [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so
> > > [root@polop root]#
> > 
> > and
> > libtcl.so   is needed by gnome-kerberos-0.2.2-1mdk
> > 
> > [root@huug2001 urpmi]# cd /usr/lib
> > [root@huug2001 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so
> > 
> > should do.
> > 
> > --
> [root@u100n41 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so
> ln: `libtcl.so': File exists
> [root@u100n41 lib]#

Manually creating the link is not the point.  The point is to fix
mandrake's packages.

Why is it that every error I report is answered with how *I* should
fix it?  I know how to fix these problems... I am reporting bugs!

Re: [Cooker] libtcl.so gone?

[JJ]

huug wrote:
> 
> Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning?
> >
> > [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX
> > installing
> > 
>/usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > libtcl.so   is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk
> > Installation failed
> > Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
> > [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so
> > [root@polop root]#
> 
> and
> libtcl.so   is needed by gnome-kerberos-0.2.2-1mdk
> 
> [root@huug2001 urpmi]# cd /usr/lib
> [root@huug2001 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so
> 
> should do.
> 
> --
[root@u100n41 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so
ln: `libtcl.so': File exists
[root@u100n41 lib]#

[Cooker] libtcl.so gone?

[Garrick Staples]

Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning?

[root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX installing 
/usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-+0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libtcl.so   is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk
Installation failed
Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
[root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so
[root@polop root]#

[Cooker] libtcl.so gone?

[Garrick Staples]

Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning?

[root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX
installing
/usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libtcl.so   is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk
Installation failed
Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N)
[root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so
[root@polop root]#