Re: [Cooker] supermount behavior
Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Is it normal to have supermount on non-removable medias (windows > partitions), and not on removable zip ? In the case of the Windows partitions, perhaps supermount simply wishes that they would be removed? (-:
Re: [Cooker] supermount behavior
Francis Galiegue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > Is it normal to have supermount on non-removable medias (windows > > partitions), and not on removable zip ? > > > > Uhno, this is a bug! supermount should never be employed for non removable > devices... > > Install bug? supermount script is chmouel's :) maybe the devfs notation causing some pb...
[Cooker] supermount behavior
just running supermount enable gives me this result : /mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom supermount fs=iso9660,dev=/dev/cdrom,ro,nosuid,noauto,nodev,exec 0 0 /mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy supermount fs=vfat,dev=/dev/floppy,nosuid,noauto,nodev,unhide 0 0 /mnt/win_c /mnt/win_c supermount fs=vfat,dev=/dev/hda1,umask=0,nosuid,nodev,exec 0 0 /mnt/win_d /mnt/win_d supermount fs=vfat,dev=/dev/hda5,umask=0,nosuid,nodev,exec 0 0 /dev/zip/mnt/zipext2 nosuid,noauto,nodev,user 0 0 ... Is it normal to have supermount on non-removable medias (windows partitions), and not on removable zip ? -- Guillaume Rousse Murphy's law : If anything can go wrong, it will. O'Tool's commentary : Murphy was an optimist.