Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
On 3 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus > > getting more files on the first cd? > http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/06/savetz/ So? However, PNG won't replace JPEG. For photographic images that can tolerate loss, JPEG usually produces smaller, more easily transferrable files. But anyway it is not a priority ;-). PNG will do the work. -- 7:18pm up 9 days, 8:21, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.09, 0.08 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\ \_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\\()//_ .'/()\'. Foo-Bar / // \\ \ jgs\\ // http://foobar.irc-unix.net| \__/ | I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0
Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
Pixel wrote: > "Jorg Pitts (306170)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus >>getting more files on the first cd? >> > > 1. it's not meant to be photos (final won't have) > 2. drakx doesn't have libjpeg handling to keep as small as possible > > > Can you ensure please that the pngs are as crushed as possible (this applies also to ads in the rcs and final)? I have been doing installs with vgalo to avoid having to d/l them on network insts and load/render them on cdrom/hd insts. my good mirrors have all dropped like flies ;(, each little pic takes 12 mins :P
Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
"Jorg Pitts (306170)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus > getting more files on the first cd? 1. it's not meant to be photos (final won't have) 2. drakx doesn't have libjpeg handling to keep as small as possible
Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
"Jorg Pitts (306170)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus > getting more files on the first cd? http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/06/savetz/
