Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1

2002-01-22 Thread Thierry Vignaud 

Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell
> > me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using ".tar" files?
> > thanks
> >
> > this is required by Mplayer for example.
> False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without problems.

yes but new binutils breaks cvs build.

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1

2002-01-21 Thread SI Reasoning 

believe it or not, the mplayer people actually rag on
gcc3 more than 2.96 in some of their documentation. It
is a nice program but it comes with an attitudinal
attachment.
--- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Ben V :
> > hi
> >
> > Just for information before i go further, could
> anybody tell
> > me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using ".tar"
> files?
> > thanks
> >
> > this is required by Mplayer for example.
> False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without
> problems.
> -- 
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPG key
> http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
> 

=
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"There never was a good war or a bad peace."
Benjamin Franklin

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1

2002-01-21 Thread Guillaume Rousse 

Ainsi parlait Ben V :
> hi
>
> Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell
> me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using ".tar" files?
> thanks
>
> this is required by Mplayer for example.
False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without problems.
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1

2002-01-19 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld 

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ben V wrote:

> Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell
> me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using ".tar" files?
> thanks

Install gcc3 from contrib. It can co-exist with gcc-2.96.

seb