Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Crispin Boylan : Could you provide us with ps -aux | grep appname first ? Hi attached. Does those command works, as root ? killall pppd killall -9 pppd [EMAIL PROTECTED] crispin]# killall pppd pppd: no process killed [EMAIL PROTECTED] crispin]# killall -9 pppd pppd: no process killed [EMAIL PROTECTED] crispin]# cheers cris.
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Ainsi parlait Crispin Boylan : > >Could you provide us with > >ps -aux | grep appname > >first ? > > Hi > attached. Does those command works, as root ? killall pppd killall -9 pppd -- When you finally buy enough memory, you will not have enough disk space. -- Murphy's Computer Laws n°3
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait FACORAT Fabrice : Le ven 04/07/2003 à 17:50, Crispin Boylan a écrit : i've tried doing that, even tried rebuilding the rpm on my machine, all to no avail! Have you try "killall -9 appname" ? Could you provide us with ps -aux | grep appname first ? Hi attached. Cris root 1703 0.0 0.1 2192 916 ?S12:25 0:00 pppd plugin pppoatm.so 0.38 password ** root 3009 0.0 0.1 1792 616 pts/1R14:09 0:00 grep pppd
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Crispin Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Have you try "killall -9 appname" ? > > yep, still doesn't work! isn't your process in d state ?
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
FACORAT Fabrice wrote: Le ven 04/07/2003 à 17:50, Crispin Boylan a écrit : i've tried doing that, even tried rebuilding the rpm on my machine, all to no avail! Have you try "killall -9 appname" ? Hi yep, still doesn't work! Cris.
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Ainsi parlait FACORAT Fabrice : > Le ven 04/07/2003 à 17:50, Crispin Boylan a écrit : > > i've tried doing that, even tried rebuilding the rpm on my machine, all > > to no avail! > > Have you try "killall -9 appname" ? Could you provide us with ps -aux | grep appname first ? -- All components become obsolete. -- Murphy's Computer Laws n°8
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Le ven 04/07/2003 à 17:50, Crispin Boylan a écrit : > i've tried doing that, even tried rebuilding the rpm on my machine, all > to no avail! Have you try "killall -9 appname" ?
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Charles A Edwards wrote: On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:15:15 +0100 Crispin Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: although this happens on other processes too, xemacs and pppd are both examples of that, in fact I haven't found a process that killall will actually kill! killall still works for me. Maybe you should check your psmisc installation or even install again with --force Charles hi i've tried doing that, even tried rebuilding the rpm on my machine, all to no avail! cris.
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:15:15 +0100 Crispin Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > although this happens on other processes too, xemacs and pppd are > both examples of that, in fact I haven't found a process that killall > will actually kill! killall still works for me. Maybe you should check your psmisc installation or even install again with --force Charles -- Reality is nothing but a collective hunch. -- Lily Tomlin - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk http://www.eslrahc.com - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Götz Waschk wrote: Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2003, 17:18:57 Uhr MET, schrieb Crispin Boylan: I load up a kate process, then in a terminal type killall kate and get the response 'no processes killed', even though kate is right there in top running away!? Hmm, have you tried to kill the process "kdeinit: kate" or something like that? hi no although this happens on other processes too, xemacs and pppd are both examples of that, in fact I haven't found a process that killall will actually kill! Cheers cris
Re: [Cooker] killall doesn't kill processes?
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2003, 17:18:57 Uhr MET, schrieb Crispin Boylan: > I load up a kate process, then in a terminal type killall kate and get > the response 'no processes killed', even though kate is right there in > top running away!? Hmm, have you tried to kill the process "kdeinit: kate" or something like that? -- What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy? Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948), "Non-Violence in Peace and War"