Re: ATI drivers for XF4.3 (FireGL but 8500 should work) (WAS: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349))

2003-04-03 Thread Ken Mays
Try: rpm --rebuild *.rpm
~Ken

- Original Message -
From: Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: ATI drivers for XF4.3 (FireGL but 8500 should work) (WAS: Re:
[Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349))



 - Original Message -
 From: Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)


  I'll investigate this further. That ATI driver should work under XFree86
  v4.3.0 and Mandrake but I don't have a 8500 card to test. May go out
today
  and get a OEM one if I can to evaluate. Will let you know.
  ~Ken

 Thank you very much, very kind of you. I just had some news : apparently,
 they have released new drivers for FireGL X1 card, and are backward
 compatible with R200. They even talk about glibc 2.3 and XFree 4.3 in
their
 readme.
 You just have to go on their web site, ask for FireGL drivers for Linux
(not
 8500) and you have to register to be able to download them (not a problem
 though, but another example of ATI lack of care of their customers
nvidia's
 professional card, Quadro, is supported in their drivers too...) A direct
 link is here :

http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/firegl/linux/linuxfireglx1z18x00x420296.h
 tml
 These drivers are dated of 28/03/03 !! That's a pity we have to beg for
 drivers for 8500 card...
 I gave a try. The installer is a lot nicer, but I have an error at
 compilation. Unfortunately, it tries to apply a patch to a kernel header,
 but fails, and cannot compile the fireglx.o driver. I'll have a better
look
 and will report the problem.
 If someone else could give a try too.

 Cheers
 Eric






Re: ATI drivers for XF4.3 (FireGL but 8500 should work) (WAS: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349))

2003-04-03 Thread Eric Fernandez
 Try: rpm --rebuild *.rpm
 ~Ken

I'll give atry thanks, but I don't think it'll help. The problem is that it
looks for a file in the kernel headers and tries to apply a patch, in 2
different locations, but fails. I think the 2.4.21 kernel in mdk is modified
so that it cannot do it. The best way would be to find the good place for
patching. I don't know if it is possible to change its patching strategy.
I'll give all the details tonight.
Eric