Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:06 AM, ianG wrote: > http://xkcd.com/1269/ finally, a succinct response to the Internet debacle! did anyone else immediately associate various friends and/or associates which each archetype? ... i'm craving strawberries. ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
> -Original Message- > From: cryptography [mailto:cryptography-boun...@randombit.net] On > Behalf Of coderman > Sent: donderdag 26 september 2013 10:07 > To: ianG > Cc: Crypto discussion list > Subject: Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:06 AM, ianG wrote: > > http://xkcd.com/1269/ > > finally, a succinct response to the Internet debacle! > > did anyone else immediately associate various friends and/or associates > which each archetype? > > ... i'm craving strawberries. So you agree we DO need an additional layer of symmetric and public key encryption, don't you? Six layers might not be enough!! ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
Paul Bakker writes: >So you agree we DO need an additional layer of symmetric and public key >encryption, don't you? Six layers might not be enough!! Oh everyone knows that, if it doesn't have the full seven layers then you're not even trying. Peter. ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
So then, the Sage in the comic is on the right path? http://tacobell.wikia.com/wiki/7-Layer_Burrito On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote: > Paul Bakker writes: > >>So you agree we DO need an additional layer of symmetric and public key >>encryption, don't you? Six layers might not be enough!! > > Oh everyone knows that, if it doesn't have the full seven layers then you're > not even trying. > > Peter. > > ___ > cryptography mailing list > cryptography@randombit.net > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
