Re: CDR: We're jamming, we're jamming, we hope you like jammin too

2004-05-12 Thread Brian Dunbar
On May 12, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Major Variola (ret) wrote:

At 03:09 PM 5/11/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
The second covers a hacking the system concept.  I'd considered
something similar myself, though different in approach.  Rather than
finding RFID chips and redistributing them, why not create
programmable RFID broadcasters which could spoof other chips, and
distribute these.  The idea being to pollute any RFID detectors with a
vast spew of superfluous data.
RFID jamming should be very easy and a quite amusing DoS attack
on commercial targets.  Easy because its not frequency hopping, low
power, and relatively low frequency.  Particularly cute would be
transmitting sex-toy codes intermittently.
ASK any Elmer you happen to see,
what's the best jamming, RFID..
(With apologies to the tuna industry and those too young to
know the jingle.  Or to know the RF double meanings.)
I remember the tune (grin).  Ah, childhood.

Would RFID jamming really be effective?  RFID scanners work when the 
chip passes the scanner - when a pallet passes a door for instance -  
at which point the scanner 'knows' that chips Abe, Bill, Charlie passed 
point Delta.  To get the jammer to work it would have to be run past 
the scanner - I don't see how an RFID jammer planted in (say) the 
changing room at Wal-Mart would be an effective DoS?

It's possible I'm ill-informed or just unclear on the concept.

~~brian



Re: CDR: Re: Can Skype be wiretapped by the authorities? (fwd from em@em.no-ip.com)

2004-05-10 Thread Brian Dunbar
On May 10, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Jack Lloyd wrote:

Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really 
allow
Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in them? 
Your CPU
is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the 
satellites.
That's a subtle bit of humor, right?

~~brian