Re: Hi, my name is Ubuntu. Can Beagle come out to play.
Miguel de Icaza wrote: It basically makes Lucene.Net less secure, the posix patch is there for a reason, and it is more sophisticated than the original solution, but since hoary wont be shipping with mono 1.0.6 (apparently) i decided it was time to break beagle and make it play nice. A better fix would be to just copy the definition for the Mono.Posix call that you are missing. That is a good idea actually, i'll see if it can be done easily. The problem itself appears to be that the open call with posix doesn't pass the flags to the system call, which causes slight havoc. This would appear to be the fix that was applied to 1.0.6. Anyways, i'll see what i get done. - S ___ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
Re: beagle inotify ABI change
Hello, And now I update inotify, fixing a little atomicity issue uncovered over the last week: http://primates.ximian.com/~rml/kernel-rml/suse-93-i586/ Am using NLD. When I try to install it, I get: linux:~/kernels # rpm -i * error: Failed dependencies: mkinitrd = 1.2 is needed by kernel-default-2.6.11.4-717.inotify.3 Where can I get this package? ___ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
Re: beagle inotify ABI change
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 13:19 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hi, Miggy. Am using NLD. When I try to install it, I get: linux:~/kernels # rpm -i * error: Failed dependencies: mkinitrd = 1.2 is needed by kernel-default-2.6.11.4-717.inotify.3 Where can I get this package? These kernels are for SUSE 9.3. I would not try running them on NLD, even if you find the missing mkinitrd package. Robert Love ___ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
Re: Hi, my name is Ubuntu. Can Beagle come out to play.
Sami Haahtinen wrote:
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
A better fix would be to just copy the definition for the Mono.Posix
call that you are missing.
That is a good idea actually, i'll see if it can be done easily.
BAH! that was too easy, now that i re-read the part that implements the
locking with posix functions i realized that when that function was
rewritten, the original function was first fixed and wrapped with
ifdefs. So, here we go, attempt 2 for a patch. This should be a bit safer.
- S
Index: beagled/Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/beagle/beagled/Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 FSDirectory.cs
--- beagled/Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs 18 Mar 2005 04:34:19 - 1.7
+++ beagled/Lucene.Net/Store/FSDirectory.cs 2 Apr 2005 18:29:53 -
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
bool obtainedLock = false;
+#if false
int fd = Mono.Posix.Syscall.open (lockFile.FullName,
Mono.Posix.OpenFlags.O_CREAT
| Mono.Posix.OpenFlags.O_EXCL,
@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@
}
-#if false
+#endif
try
{
System.IO.FileStream createdFile = lockFile.Create();
@@ -101,7 +102,6 @@
{
// Just fall through
}
-#endif
Log ({0} lock {1}, obtainedLock ? Obtained : Could not obtain, lockFile.FullName);
return obtainedLock;
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
segfault.cam.novell.com update
Was just wondering if this red-carpet channel is still being updated? I am anxiously awaiting updates to beagle and f-spot -- David Barker Master CNI, Master CNE, CLE, MCSE, CCNA ___ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
Re: trigger the indexing of a specific directory without inotify
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 23:40 +0100, Albert Vilella wrote: Hi, I'm testing beagle-0.0.8 in a non-inotify 0.20-enabled FC3 kernel, And I would like to know if it is possible to trigger the indexing of a specific directory in any way. As I don't have 0.20-inotify, neither ls nor touch methods work for me, I don't think there's a way to do this right now. Nat ___ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
