Re: [deal.II] Re: Read serial vector into a parallel vector

2016-06-20 Thread Daniel Arndt
Praveen,

Am Montag, 20. Juni 2016 18:05:12 UTC+2 schrieb Praveen C:
>
> Hello Daniel
>
> I have a normal Triangulation and I solve on this using a Vector. 
> I could save this to file calling Vector::print.
>
> Is it now possible to read this into a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector ?
>
No, there is no such function. A Vector does only make sense in connection 
with a DoFHandler.
Therefore the question is what you want to achieve in the first place.
If you want to write a TrilinosWrappers::Vector to a file and initialize a 
TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector with it aftwerwards,
why don't you use a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector from the beginning?

Something you can also try is to associate the DoFs in the serial vector 
with the ones in the parallel vector (e.g. by support_points and component) 
and assign
the values accordingly.
Note that there is also the possibility to initialize a (parallel) 
TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector from a (serial) TrilinosWrappers::Vector 
directly [1].

Best,
Daniel

[1] 
https://dealii.org/8.4.1/doxygen/deal.II/classTrilinosWrappers_1_1MPI_1_1Vector.html#a814279778da76eb9a17eedce154a61f7

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[deal.II] Re: Reuse factorization in Trilinos direct solver

2016-06-20 Thread Denis Davydov
FYI, the doxygen field was wrong for the extra solve() function, thus it 
was not shown. Should be fixed in https://github.com/dealii/dealii/pull/2694

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 3:48:56 PM UTC+2, Praveen C wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I want to use the direct solver MUMPS via Trilinos. I need to solve the 
> same matrix problem repeatedly. How can I reuse the LU factorization ?
>
> In SparseDirectUMFPACK, calling vmult allows me to solve many problems 
> with same factorization.
>
> Is such a thing possible with TrilinosWrappers::SolverDirect ?
>
> Thanks
> praveen
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[deal.II] Re: Reuse factorization in Trilinos direct solver

2016-06-20 Thread Denis Davydov
Hi Praven,

I don't think you need to hack anything, this is AFAIK already possible, see
https://github.com/dealii/dealii/pull/2493

You need to compile deal.II from Git to get this.

Regards,
Denis.

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 3:48:56 PM UTC+2, Praveen C wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I want to use the direct solver MUMPS via Trilinos. I need to solve the 
> same matrix problem repeatedly. How can I reuse the LU factorization ?
>
> In SparseDirectUMFPACK, calling vmult allows me to solve many problems 
> with same factorization.
>
> Is such a thing possible with TrilinosWrappers::SolverDirect ?
>
> Thanks
> praveen
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [deal.II] WorkStream iterator

2016-06-20 Thread Daniel Shapero
So glad I asked this question instead of reinventing the wheel :) I was 
mostly working off the Boussinesq and elasticity examples, so I missed 
step-35.

On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 3:18:33 PM UTC-7, bangerth wrote:
>
> On 06/19/2016 04:12 PM, Daniel Shapero wrote: 
> > I'm working on a problem which involves iterating over the DoFHandlers 
> of both 
> > a scalar and a vector field at the same time, similar to step 31 
> > <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dealii.org_developer_doxygen_deal.II_step-5F31.html-23BoussinesqFlowProblemassemble-5Fstokes-5Fsystem&d=AwMFaQ&c=ODFT-G5SujMiGrKuoJJjVg&r=bn1clvQAiDQrfAC4yKbN0PlSr7RWRs-U3WJ0zRBB2qM&m=LKWtqGDlr1IIKNzL19q-BeEv113uSM-htWgg0-mfxtg&s=ZhkrkZJVtq3qsxTuL_dfYkgGkRnWYG_k859WMeIjWYQ&e=>.
>  
>
> > I'm creating an iterator class which will wrap up the iterators for both 
> the 
> > scalar and vector field into one object using a std::array of 
> > active_cell_iterators. The increment operator is implemented by 
> incrementing 
> > each active_cell_iterator in the array; the dereference operator returns 
> a 
> > reference to the array; etc. I've tested this out and it works fine. 
> > 
> > I'd like to be able to parallelize the assembly using WorkStream, which 
> uses 
> > an iterator range. What operations are required of the iterators passed 
> to 
> > WorkStream? From the comments in the source code, it looks like the 
> iterator 
> > must have operator- defined, so I take it that it must be a 
> random-access 
> > iterator 
> > <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__en.cppreference.com_w_cpp_concept_RandomAccessIterator&d=AwMFaQ&c=ODFT-G5SujMiGrKuoJJjVg&r=bn1clvQAiDQrfAC4yKbN0PlSr7RWRs-U3WJ0zRBB2qM&m=LKWtqGDlr1IIKNzL19q-BeEv113uSM-htWgg0-mfxtg&s=vlOxQjDUZgqn4d-Y5UwVkuANFbQJHZSsP3ooIzECGyc&e=>.
>  
>
> > The simple multi-iterator implementation I have now is only a forward 
> > iterator, since that was the bare minimum needed to get things working 
> in 
> > single-threaded mode. 
>
> Daniel, 
> you are looking for the SynchronousIterator class :-) 
>
> Cheers 
>   W. 
>
> -- 
>  
> Wolfgang Bangerth   email:bang...@math.tamu.edu 
>  
>  www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/ 
>
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [deal.II] Re: Reuse factorization in Trilinos direct solver

2016-06-20 Thread 'Uwe Köcher' via deal . II User Group
Here you can find some class, which I'm using for that:

https://github.com/koecher/meat/blob/master/source/DTM%2B%2B/core/lss/SolverAmesos.cc

Best
  Uwe

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 6:22:40 PM UTC+2, Praveen C wrote:
>
> Thanks Uwe. I will try that.
>
> Best
> praveen
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:54 PM, 'Uwe Köcher' via deal.II User Group <
> dea...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>> No, this interface uses a solve function, in which the algebraic and 
>> numeric factorisation is done each time the solve() function
>> is called. This has something to do with the common interface for the 
>> direct and iterative solvers.
>> But it is easy to implement yourself, take a look into 
>> lac/trilinos_sovler.h and lac/trilinos_solver.cc to see how the Amesos 
>> package is
>> called.
>>
>> Best
>>   Uwe
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 3:48:56 PM UTC+2, Praveen C wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I want to use the direct solver MUMPS via Trilinos. I need to solve the 
>>> same matrix problem repeatedly. How can I reuse the LU factorization ?
>>>
>>> In SparseDirectUMFPACK, calling vmult allows me to solve many problems 
>>> with same factorization.
>>>
>>> Is such a thing possible with TrilinosWrappers::SolverDirect ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> praveen
>>>
>> -- 
>> The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
>> For mailing list/forum options, see 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "deal.II User Group" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to dealii+un...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [deal.II] Re: Reuse factorization in Trilinos direct solver

2016-06-20 Thread Praveen C
Thanks Uwe. I will try that.

Best
praveen

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:54 PM, 'Uwe Köcher' via deal.II User Group <
dealii@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> No, this interface uses a solve function, in which the algebraic and
> numeric factorisation is done each time the solve() function
> is called. This has something to do with the common interface for the
> direct and iterative solvers.
> But it is easy to implement yourself, take a look into
> lac/trilinos_sovler.h and lac/trilinos_solver.cc to see how the Amesos
> package is
> called.
>
> Best
>   Uwe
>
>
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 3:48:56 PM UTC+2, Praveen C wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to use the direct solver MUMPS via Trilinos. I need to solve the
>> same matrix problem repeatedly. How can I reuse the LU factorization ?
>>
>> In SparseDirectUMFPACK, calling vmult allows me to solve many problems
>> with same factorization.
>>
>> Is such a thing possible with TrilinosWrappers::SolverDirect ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> praveen
>>
> --
> The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
> For mailing list/forum options, see
> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "deal.II User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [deal.II] Re: Read serial vector into a parallel vector

2016-06-20 Thread Praveen C
Hello Daniel

I have a normal Triangulation and I solve on this using a Vector. I
could save this to file calling Vector::print.

Is it now possible to read this into a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector ?

If not, what other option do I have to achieve this result.

Thanks
praveen

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Arndt <
d.ar...@math.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:

> Praveen,
>
> I solve a PDE in serial and save the solution to file.
>>
> Do you mean that your triangulation is not a
> parallel::distributed::Triangulation or that you are simply running with
> one process?
>
>
>> Is there a way to now read this solution into a
>> TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector object ?
>>
> If you already save the solution from a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector
> object, then parallel::distributed::SolutionTransfer should work for you as
> well.
> Note that you are allowed to choose the number of processes when reading
> different from the number of processes you used for writing.
> If your original vector is not a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector object, how
> did you write the vector to a file?
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> --
> The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
> For mailing list/forum options, see
> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "deal.II User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[deal.II] Re: Reuse factorization in Trilinos direct solver

2016-06-20 Thread 'Uwe Köcher' via deal . II User Group
No, this interface uses a solve function, in which the algebraic and 
numeric factorisation is done each time the solve() function
is called. This has something to do with the common interface for the 
direct and iterative solvers.
But it is easy to implement yourself, take a look into 
lac/trilinos_sovler.h and lac/trilinos_solver.cc to see how the Amesos 
package is
called.

Best
  Uwe

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 3:48:56 PM UTC+2, Praveen C wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I want to use the direct solver MUMPS via Trilinos. I need to solve the 
> same matrix problem repeatedly. How can I reuse the LU factorization ?
>
> In SparseDirectUMFPACK, calling vmult allows me to solve many problems 
> with same factorization.
>
> Is such a thing possible with TrilinosWrappers::SolverDirect ?
>
> Thanks
> praveen
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[deal.II] Re: Read serial vector into a parallel vector

2016-06-20 Thread Daniel Arndt
Praveen,

I solve a PDE in serial and save the solution to file.
>
Do you mean that your triangulation is not a 
parallel::distributed::Triangulation or that you are simply running with 
one process?
 

> Is there a way to now read this solution into a 
> TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector object ?
>
If you already save the solution from a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector 
object, then parallel::distributed::SolutionTransfer should work for you as 
well.
Note that you are allowed to choose the number of processes when reading 
different from the number of processes you used for writing.
If your original vector is not a TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector object, how 
did you write the vector to a file?

Best,
Daniel

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[deal.II] Read serial vector into a parallel vector

2016-06-20 Thread Praveen C
Hello

I solve a PDE in serial and save the solution to file.

Is there a way to now read this solution into a
TrilinosWrappers::MPI::Vector object ?

Thanks
praveen

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[deal.II] Reuse factorization in Trilinos direct solver

2016-06-20 Thread Praveen C
Hi

I want to use the direct solver MUMPS via Trilinos. I need to solve the
same matrix problem repeatedly. How can I reuse the LU factorization ?

In SparseDirectUMFPACK, calling vmult allows me to solve many problems with
same factorization.

Is such a thing possible with TrilinosWrappers::SolverDirect ?

Thanks
praveen

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.