Re: [Debconf-video] Missing audio from debbugs-22-years-of-bugs.vp8.webm
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 09:26:37PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that one debconf movie doesn't contain any audio. > > http://caesar.ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2017/debconf17/ > debbugs-22-years-of-bugs.vp8.webm > > It says that two minutes of the talk wrere lost by recording machine trouble, > but it doesn't say anything about audio. > Entire audio in this talk were lost too? There was a bug in the transcode script which caused audio to be lost in the case of an apology slide. This has been rectified, and the video retranscoded. If you redownload the video, it should now have audio. Regards, -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 02:42:57PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:15:29PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > This has now been scheduled for tomorrow at noon in the "potato" room. I > > was going to schedule it for today, but I came up fairly late with the > > idea and didn't schedule it in time, so hence the move to tomorrow. > > sorry, I missed that totally and thus the event as well… No worries. There were seven people in the room: highvoltage, tumbleweed, olasd, pollo, and myself; and bdale and keith as "audience". In all, that means it was not very well attended, but hey :-) > > I guess someone should do slides? I'll have a quick look at preparing > > something, but input would be welcome. > > are those slides available somewhere or other notes? The slides are very basic; they don't contain a lot of information. Still, you can get them here: https://nextcloud.grep.be/index.php/s/Hd9idJdmdSdAZw7 I did forget to add a slide about the opsis boards, but we talked about those too, in between the final two slides. Regards, -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation
So, On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > As an aside to that, I think it also makes sense to do some internal > evaluation. Did things work as expected? Do we need to fix things > somewhere? What worked, what didn't work? This. As for my bit, I think sreview performed as I had expected it. There is still room for improvement (especially in that ffmpeg defaults to pretty horrid resolution settings for VP8, hadn't noticed that), but other than that it worked well. Unless people disagree, I intend to use it for future events, rather than veyepar. However, I'm not planning to disable the veyepar instance on vittoria, so it can still be used if needs be. I think the cameras worked well, we chose good. Their zoom is okay, their low-light performance is great, nothing more you'd want than that. As I've said a few times, we should move away from MPEG2 encoding and onto something that is HTML5-compatible. MPEG2 means sreview can't use the original encodings for the previews, which makes it take a lot of time to generate a preview. Additionally, MPEG2 takes a lot of diskspace, a lot more than the DV recordings did (and those were horribly inefficient). FOSDEM has had great results with H.264; Mark van den Borre can tell you more about that. We should investigate this at the sprint in Cambridge. Any other thoughts? -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab ___ Debconf-video mailing list Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
