Re: MAME?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:23:31PM +0200, antongiulio05 wrote: for my free time I thought to install mame, but in repository there is 'xmame-common' not installable. Latest version is 0.100 (i'm not sure). Is there a working repository for it? Regular xmame 0.100 is in the non-free section of sid for most architectures. However, due to license restrictions, the amd64 mirror is unable to provide it at this time. If you're running sid, it does build out of the box without any problems from debian sources on amd64, albeit it takes an hour or two to build on my lowly box. It appears to run fine without any problems, but I'm not really a gamer... -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Goswin: your 32bit archive
John Kehayias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So is the script only for producing packages for a new bi-arch system (requiring the new apt and dpkg)? Or can we still use it to convert a few other packages (not in your original script you posted) to use in a plain pure64 system? If it's not too ingrained with apt/dpkg, then maybe I could play around with the script to do what I need. John You can still use the original post + the patches posted for it to convert i386 debs to amd64 pure64. The latest version though has several things hardcoded to work the way I need it to at work due to time constraints. I intend to generalize them again at some point though. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tyan Thunder K8W S2885 with 4GB memory missing memory??
I have found my memory. One must set two seperate setting in the BIOS that both are not ducumented in teh most recent manual. The first is in the Advanced, CPU configuration section. Set MTRR to discrete. The second is in the Chipset, North Bridge Configuration, Memory configuration section. Set Software memory hole to enabled. -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tyan Thunder K8W S2885 with 4GB memory missing memory??
Joost, Quite a while ago I did the same on my Tyan S2875 and linux indeed started seeing all 4GB of memory. BUT! As soon as application were trying to access high memory regions, the system crashed. I would suggest first to test the memory usage. The simplest test is copying a dvd image or a file of comparable size so it would get cached into memory. Max Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: I have found my memory. One must set two seperate setting in the BIOS that both are not ducumented in teh most recent manual. The first is in the Advanced, CPU configuration section. Set MTRR to discrete. The second is in the Chipset, North Bridge Configuration, Memory configuration section. Set Software memory hole to enabled. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: AMD 64 Stability on Asus A8v Deluxe
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:18:34AM -0400, Alan Manning wrote: Hi. I am having stability issues with the A8V as well. Most especially I can't manually set my ram to 400 instead of 333 even though I am running corsair twinx perf ram. Did you even find any sort of resolution for this? I'm running a gf6800gt and Athlon 3800 as well. I was thinking maybe my power supply wasn't stable or something.I always hate to just blame the board. Hmm, I have an A8V Deluxe here with 2 x 512M kingston value ram DDR400, and it just runs perfectly with memory set to 400MHz. I think I just have it set to auto and it does that. Using an Athlon 64 3500+. I have one memory stick per memory channel. I run a 350W enermax power supply, so nice but nothing fancy. Using latest bios version? Is corsair memory considered supported by the board (I have never used corsair memory). Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: AMD 64 Stability on Asus A8v Deluxe
Le 29.09.2005 15:29:21, Lennart Sorensen a écrit : On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:18:34AM -0400, Alan Manning wrote: Hi. I am having stability issues with the A8V as well. Most especially I can't manually set my ram to 400 instead of 333 even though I am running corsair twinx perf ram. Did you even find any sort of resolution for this? I'm running a gf6800gt and Athlon 3800 as well. I was thinking maybe my power supply wasn't stable or something.I always hate to just blame the board. Hmm, I have an A8V Deluxe here with 2 x 512M kingston value ram DDR400, and it just runs perfectly with memory set to 400MHz. I think I just have it set to auto and it does that. Using an Athlon 64 3500+. I have one memory stick per memory channel. I run a 350W enermax power supply, so nice but nothing fancy. Using latest bios version? Is corsair memory considered supported by the board (I have never used corsair memory). I've a 3500+ with twin 2x512k Corsair 3200C2. I've experienced some problems: I had an Antenc Sonata (380W PSU) and the PSU was not stable. It has been replaced with a SonataII with more power and stable PSU. I run the RAM 2.5-3-3-6 1T, I've had some problems reported by memtest86+ on one of the SIMM. During the tests, the problems disappeared... Len Sorensen Jean-Luc pgpy0GPK6ojhw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: MAME?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:49:22AM +0200, Kaare Hviid wrote: Regular xmame 0.100 is in the non-free section of sid for most architectures. However, due to license restrictions, the amd64 mirror is unable to provide it at this time. If you're running sid, it does build out of the box without any problems from debian sources on amd64, albeit it takes an hour or two to build on my lowly box. It appears to run fine without any problems, but I'm not really a gamer... How lowly can any amd64 system be? Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAME? AMD64 not official?
I know this is an old issue, but we look like debian, smell like debian but we are not? Is there anything we can do to have the rights of a real debian distribution? It seems to me that we are except someone, somewhere has to put his/her seal of approval. Come on already, what system should people buy these days? Intel and AMD both offer 64bits, and I know that AMD64 was not at a premium at all. It's all they offered! I think this AMD64 project has done a great job, and has earned the right to be official, and would like to help. MD - Original Message - From: Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:10 AM Subject: Re: MAME? On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:49:22AM +0200, Kaare Hviid wrote: Regular xmame 0.100 is in the non-free section of sid for most architectures. However, due to license restrictions, the amd64 mirror is unable to provide it at this time. If you're running sid, it does build out of the box without any problems from debian sources on amd64, albeit it takes an hour or two to build on my lowly box. It appears to run fine without any problems, but I'm not really a gamer... How lowly can any amd64 system be? Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: AMD 64 Stability on Asus A8v Deluxe
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:43:25PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: I've a 3500+ with twin 2x512k Corsair 3200C2. I've experienced some problems: I had an Antenc Sonata (380W PSU) and the PSU was not stable. It has been replaced with a SonataII with more power and stable PSU. I run the RAM 2.5-3-3-6 1T, I've had some problems reported by memtest86+ on one of the SIMM. During the tests, the problems disappeared... I only have CL3 memory (didn't seem worth spending that much more on CL2.5 memory). So far the system has been absolutely stable running the bios memory settings at auto. Runs rather nice and fast too. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAME? AMD64 not official?
If there are any packages currently known to be broken, I would love to know about it. Maybe I can fix a few (I have fixed a few already when I found out about them, and the problem seemed simple). Gnome-system-monitor is broken (in combination with a ia32 chroot /home directory as per FAQ for OpenOffice)and the i386 port has a new version in proposed-packages that should work. Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl
Re: Re: AMD 64 Stability on Asus A8v Deluxe
Le 29.09.2005 17:52:30, Lennart Sorensen a écrit : On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:43:25PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: I've a 3500+ with twin 2x512k Corsair 3200C2. I've experienced some problems: I had an Antenc Sonata (380W PSU) and the PSU was not stable. It has been replaced with a SonataII with more power and stable PSU. I run the RAM 2.5-3-3-6 1T, I've had some problems reported by memtest86+ on one of the SIMM. During the tests, the problems disappeared... I only have CL3 memory (didn't seem worth spending that much more on CL2.5 memory). So far the system has been absolutely stable running the bios memory settings at auto. Runs rather nice and fast too. If you have a look in the real settings when set to auto, you will see that all the timing parameters are very relaxed. A simple run of memtest will tell you the truth about these settings Len Sorensen Jean-Luc pgp9OEEEwSeCV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: K8 Mainboard addition
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:26:45AM +0200, In The Night wrote: Mobo : Abit AN8 Ultra (NForce4 Ultra) ATA : amd74xx SATA : sata_nv Sound : intel8x0 Network : forcedeth Installed with the 2.6.12 Len Sorensen installer - Thanks for the great work Other hardware running smoothly: Pinnacle PCTV Pro : bttv, msp3400 Logitech quickcam express : spca5xx (Thanks to Michel Xhaard for making this module) HP PSC 2610 (MemoryCardreader,Scanner and Printer working - Fax not working) HighPoint Rocket 1520 : hpt366 Nvidia 7800GT : A _big_ thanx to the debian people which made module-assistant. No kidding. What a wonderful little tool. Especially the a-i option. Athlon64 3800+ X2 : Finally [EMAIL PROTECTED] at an affordable price. Couple of things which are of small annoyance: 1. Abit hasn't released any spec on the uGuru chip, but I have found some small program to atleast read the sensors. It would be _so_ nice to do realtime OC'ing. 2. SATA spindown is broken, atleast I believe so when reading the kernel lists and hearing my 4 SATA disk spinning on full spaad all day long. I know the libata developers are working on adding support for sending low level commands to sata disks for things like smart monitoring and spin down and such. I am fairly sure it isn't supported yet. 3. Sound cannot be captured directly from the PCTV Pro using btaudio - because of bad wiring? Ehm, input muted on sound card maybe? No idea. 4. The hardware sound controls on my USB-headset (a Plantronics GameCom Pro) is not working - alsamixer works fine... Well if the headset follows usb sound standards for the audio part, it will work fine. Any buttons on it are likely proprietary and would need a driver written to handle them. That probably isn't a standard part of the usb audio specification. 5. My Plextor DVD-burner hickups sometimes usning mkisofs/growisofs - reports busy device or something like that. Do you have the latest firmware on the drive? My plextors work great, although I did have a hickup early on with one of them when using older firmware. A firmware update fixed that. Fortunately that can be done from linux. A couple of questions: 1. I'm thinking of buying a SATA controller to put in one of the PCI Express X1 slots. Chipset is SiL3132. Is the support OK in recent kernels? It is not supported in 2.6.8 or 2.6.12. It has experimental support in the libata patch for 2.6.13-rc7 though. Not sure if it is included in any released kernel yet. 2. I'm thinking of changing the PCTV Pro to a Hauppauge! WinTV PVR500 MCE. Anyone know if the support in ivtv is OK for this card? Well so far I have heard great things for the 250 and 350 in ivtv. If the 500 really is just 2 x 250 on one card, I would imagine ivtv should work with it to, but I have not heard from anyone with a 500 card yet so I don't know. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: AMD 64 Stability on Asus A8v Deluxe
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:04:11PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: If you have a look in the real settings when set to auto, you will see that all the timing parameters are very relaxed. I don't mind relaxed as long as it is very stable. A simple run of memtest will tell you the truth about these settings Well so far the system is much much faster than the 2.8ghz p4 we also have so I don't care to try and make the ram even 5% faster if it costs stability in any way. :) Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISO md5sum signing paranoia
I'm reinventing the wheel while learnig abou Debian key signing, so far I've been able to verify sarge-amd64 DVD iso images via $ gpg --verify MD5SUMS.sign MD5SUMS gpg: Signature made Mon 13 Jun 2005 10:48:17 PM CEST using DSA key ID F6A32A8E gpg: Good signature from Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3F0A 12FC 0B55 A917 D791 82D3 72FD C205 F6A3 2A8E I'd like to know how to get rid of warning above. So far I've imported the whole Debian keyring gpg --import /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg which action may be pretty stupid, but I expected some higher authority key being present there, well, it is not, as I'm still getting warning about not certified key. Is there anything like Debian CA key, or shoul I ask Santiago Garcia Mantinan about his key's fingerprint? Thanks for any enlightement. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel compilation failure
Well... I'm completely confused now.
I retried a compilation, and got (in kern.log):
Sep 29 16:29:48 dusk kernel: [17767.440232] mv[32221] general protection
rip:2aaac80e rsp:7ffbfc00 error:0
As usual, so to speak.
(There were many of these, corresponding to yesterday's
gcc's segfaults.)
Stubbornly, I tried again (compiling 2.6.13.2 under 2.6.13.2),
and this time, it worked!
And again, 5 or 6 times, no segmentation fault, no crash.
Strange, no?
But, even stranger, I also tried to compile a 2.6.10 and a 2.6.11
kernel, and for those, I consistently get:
[...]
CHK usr/initramfs_list
UPD usr/initramfs_list
./usr/gen_init_cpio usr/initramfs_list usr/initramfs_data.cpio
gzip -f -9 usr/initramfs_data.cpio usr/initramfs_data.cpio.gz
gcc -Wp,-MD,usr/.initramfs_data.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude
-D__ASSEMBLY__-c -o usr/initramfs_data.o usr/initramfs_data.S
ld -m elf_x86_64 -r -o usr/built-in.o usr/initramfs_data.o
/usr/bin/make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/x86_64/kernel
gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/x86_64/kernel/.process.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
-ffreestanding -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=k8 -mno-red-zone
-mcmodel=kernel -pipe -fno-reorder-blocks-Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2
-mno-3dnow -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign
-DKBUILD_BASENAME=process -DKBUILD_MODNAME=process -c -o
arch/x86_64/kernel/.tmp_process.o arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1059: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1082: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1608: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1609: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1610: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1611: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
make[2]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/eran/system/kernel/source/linux-2.6.11'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
Between yesterday and today, I only did an 'apt-get dist-upgrade',
and another memory test (memtest) but didn't fiddle with the
hardware.
How to make sense of this?
Thanks.
Gilles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel compilation failure
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:02:13PM +0200, Gilles wrote:
Well... I'm completely confused now.
I retried a compilation, and got (in kern.log):
Sep 29 16:29:48 dusk kernel: [17767.440232] mv[32221] general protection
rip:2aaac80e rsp:7ffbfc00 error:0
As usual, so to speak.
(There were many of these, corresponding to yesterday's
gcc's segfaults.)
Stubbornly, I tried again (compiling 2.6.13.2 under 2.6.13.2),
and this time, it worked!
And again, 5 or 6 times, no segmentation fault, no crash.
Strange, no?
But, even stranger, I also tried to compile a 2.6.10 and a 2.6.11
kernel, and for those, I consistently get:
[...]
CHK usr/initramfs_list
UPD usr/initramfs_list
./usr/gen_init_cpio usr/initramfs_list usr/initramfs_data.cpio
gzip -f -9 usr/initramfs_data.cpio usr/initramfs_data.cpio.gz
gcc -Wp,-MD,usr/.initramfs_data.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude
-D__ASSEMBLY__-c -o usr/initramfs_data.o usr/initramfs_data.S
ld -m elf_x86_64 -r -o usr/built-in.o usr/initramfs_data.o
/usr/bin/make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/x86_64/kernel
gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/x86_64/kernel/.process.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
-ffreestanding -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=k8 -mno-red-zone
-mcmodel=kernel -pipe -fno-reorder-blocks-Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2
-mno-3dnow -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign
-DKBUILD_BASENAME=process -DKBUILD_MODNAME=process -c -o
arch/x86_64/kernel/.tmp_process.o arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1059: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1082: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1608: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1609: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1610: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1611: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
make[2]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/eran/system/kernel/source/linux-2.6.11'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
Between yesterday and today, I only did an 'apt-get dist-upgrade',
and another memory test (memtest) but didn't fiddle with the
hardware.
How to make sense of this?
binutils 2.16 fixed a bug, which unfortunately whacks older kernels'
assembly code. I think 2.6.12 includes the fixes already.
This patch fixed the compile problems with the new binutils in 2.6.8 for
me:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.6-seg-5.patch
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISO md5sum signing paranoia
On Thursday 29 September 2005 18:54, vitko wrote: I'm reinventing the wheel while learnig abou Debian key signing, so far I've been able to verify sarge-amd64 DVD iso images via $ gpg --verify MD5SUMS.sign MD5SUMS gpg: Signature made Mon 13 Jun 2005 10:48:17 PM CEST using DSA key ID F6A32A8E gpg: Good signature from Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3F0A 12FC 0B55 A917 D791 82D3 72FD C205 F6A3 2A8E I'd like to know how to get rid of warning above. So far I've imported the whole Debian keyring gpg just works this way. Why would you trust these keys until you met those people yourself ? The idea is that either YOU meet these people, or that somebody you trust did it for you, or that somebody you trust knows somebody he trusts who knows this trusty gal, who had a relation with a bloke, who met the guy at this congress wich he now trusts. Thats what the web of trust is about. Of course, if you implicitly and blindly trust those keys to belong to the people they claim to belong to, you could declare them to be trusted or sing them with your own private key. You can either use gpg for that directly (see help, look for edit-key and then trust or sign) or, easier, use kgpg for a friendlier interface. but ... do you really trust those keys ? Thanks for any enlightement. hopefully it helped. Ernest. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel compilation failure
Hi.
Stubbornly, I tried again (compiling 2.6.13.2 under 2.6.13.2),
and this time, it worked!
And again, 5 or 6 times, no segmentation fault, no crash.
I spoke too quickly :-{
Seemingly, it was just a short-lived miracle. Now I have these
general protection faults at every compilation attempt, each time
at a different step, and not always for the same program:
Sep 29 20:11:10 dusk kernel: [31047.241928] rm[11316] general protection
rip:2aaac80e rsp:7f9c0fa0 error:0
Sep 29 20:21:16 dusk kernel: [31653.305200] mv[32625] general protection
rip:2aaac80e rsp:7ffc1680 error:0
Sep 29 21:00:50 dusk kernel: [34026.992832] mv[21793] general protection
rip:2aaac80e rsp:7fbc08b0 error:0
But, even stranger, I also tried to compile a 2.6.10 and a 2.6.11
kernel, and for those, I consistently get:
[...]
binutils 2.16 fixed a bug, which unfortunately whacks older kernels'
assembly code. I think 2.6.12 includes the fixes already.
OK. This explains the other failures.
But for the problem above, I'm stuck. This was suggested (on the AMD
forums) as a possible cause:
-
Also, I (and many others) had horrible experiences with the Silicon Image
controllers on todays motherboards -- if your system begins to use swap
during build and you use SATA drive(s), your paged-out memory may
occasionally be corrupted
-
[I have SATA_sil 3114 (BIOS 5.037) onboard.]
Also, other people seem to have the similar (?) problems, also with
Tyan Opteron MBs:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0506.0/0052.html
Is there a way to be sure it is, or not, a kernel bug? Or a hardware
failure?
Regards,
Gilles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel compilation failure
Also, other people seem to have the similar (?) problems, also with Tyan Opteron MBs: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0506.0/0052.html Another one: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0508.0/0708.html Is there a way to be sure it is, or not, a kernel bug? Or a hardware failure? The answer to the above post suggests a kernel bug. And this one http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2005-06/3314.html indicates the bug was intriduced in kernel 2.6.11-mm1. From the rest of that thread, it would seem that the bug was eliminated. But fail it still does... )-; Gilles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Re: Qt 4.0.0 and 4.0.1, /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Qt 4.0.0 and 4.0.1, /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext Date: September 29, 2005 04:22 pm From: Dimitri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, As far as I can see, the official home of Debian for AMD64 is: http://amd64.debian.net/ There I wasn't able to find where to download packages for the stable/Sarge AMD64 port. That would be done either by using the folder structure: http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-amd64/pool/main/x/xfree86/ But that's where I went in the first place. I may have misunderstood something, but this whole discussion started when you wrote that's not the place to look for the stable version. I'm afraid I'm completely lost now. As I said the glibc packages there do provide /usr/lib64 and /lib64 links: $ wget http://amd64.debian.net/.../glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22_amd64.deb $ ar p libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22_amd64.deb data.tar.gz | tar tzvf - | fgrep lib64 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-05-12 00:11:05 ./usr/lib64 - lib lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-05-12 00:11:05 ./lib64 - lib $ $ wget http://amd64.debian.net/.../glibc/libc6_2.3.5-6_amd64.deb $ ar p libc6_2.3.5-6_amd64.deb data.tar.gz | tar tzvf - | fgrep lib64 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-08-31 03:00:57 ./usr/lib64 - lib lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-08-31 03:00:57 ./lib64 - lib $ It looks like the X11 packages miss a /usr/X11R6/lib64 link. If so that's a Debian bug and it should be reported to Debian. -- Dimitri -- To unsubscribe - send unsubscribe in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] List archive and information: http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/ --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gtk/Gnome software only english
Hi, 2/3 days ago, after an updating (debian unstable), internationalization is disappeared (it was italian, now it's just english) for every gtk/gnome software. For KDE desktop env and software, no problems. I have noticed (but I don't know if it's related) that google-bar on firefox (just english now) doesn't work (and word-translator by google is not working too). Is it a common problem? Can be it solved? Thanks, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
