Re: Flash in firefox on amd64 -- revisted?
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:20:03 +0200, Andrew Robinson wrote: > Any hope of running flash on amd64 without chroot jailing firefox to > 32bit mode? If you talk about the macromedia plugin, you need the 32bit browser. Otherwise, try gnash. -- Best Regards, Jack Linux User #264449 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice in chroot -- fonts?
I managed to get openoffice to install fine in a ia32 chroot environment (from pages like [1]). It runs okay, but everything is extremely large. The fonts (menu bars, dialogs, etc.) are about 18pt font or so (buttons in the dialogs are huge). I'm not sure if this is a dpi, font or resolution problem. Would appreciate some advice. I'm starting to debate ditching amd64 for i386 as much as I'd hate to to avoid all these problems (mplayer & codecs, flash in firefox, openoffice, wine, etc.). Environment: etch/testing amd64 [1]http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/356 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flash in firefox on amd64 -- revisted?
I came across and archive on this list about firefox crashing with "BadShmSeg" when attempting to use "libflash-mozplugin", but I could find no work around or resolution. www.directv.com causes this in my case (btw -- I am on etch/testing) Any hope of running flash on amd64 without chroot jailing firefox to 32bit mode? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: using module-assistant with 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Hi, thx for your help, I realized that my sources.list was also pointing to unstable while my system is testing and I was away for some days, so my kernel was out of date, I got back to 2.6.16-2 and updated sources.list. thanks Hamish> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:57:24PM -0500, Igor TAmara wrote: Hamish> > I can't "apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8", the Hamish> > closest kernel headers I can find is linux-headers-2.6.17-2-amd64 Hamish> > that I have installed. What would be better : Hamish> > try to install linux-image-2.6.17-2-amd64 ? or what else? Hamish> Hamish> Works fine here; perhaps your mirror is out of date? Hamish> Hamish> [12:36pm] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sudo apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 Hamish> Password: Hamish> Reading package lists... Done Hamish> Building dependency tree... Done Hamish> linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 is already the newest version. Hamish> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Hamish> Hamish> Hamish> Hamish Hamish> -- Hamish> Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hamish> Hamish> Hamish> -- Hamish> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hamish> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hamish> -- Recomiendo aprender acerca del término hacker http://igor.tamarapatino.org/escritos/hackersycrackers/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Where is hydra ?
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:50:08 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > It was formerly in Debian/unstable. Now it is gone, but I > did not read anything, why it is gone. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=258057 -- Best Regards, Jack Linux User #264449 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where is hydra ?
Hello, did I miss something ? I am looking for a package named "hydra" and "hydra-gtk" . It was formerly in Debian/unstable. Now it is gone, but I did not read anything, why it is gone. Google says, it is is still in unstable. Thanks for hints Ragards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
