Re: nvidia-glx not updating
happy to be wrong :) Dean Randall Donald wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:04 +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote: maybe your mirror is confused? its worth adding rdonalds archive to your apt.sources http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/index.php Not really. It hasn't been updated for months. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel module eeprom causing system freeze
regardless, when i got home from work it booted properly. with no changes or updates. seems strange. but oh well, back to normal computing... Dean Gabor Gombas wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:26:29AM +, Koen Tavernier wrote: The package lm-sensors uses the eeprom module to get temperature readings from motherboard sensors. No, the eeprom module is not involved in temperature monitoring. You need the eeprom module when e.g. you want to know the parameters of the memory modules you have installed. Gabor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nvidia-glx not updating
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:04 +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote: > maybe your mirror is confused? > > its worth adding rdonalds archive to your apt.sources > > http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/index.php > Not really. It hasn't been updated for months. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nvidia-glx not updating
> here I couldn't even make > apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source > like I did always before. This now downloads the nvidia-graphics-drivers > source package - is this the right way nowadays? I tried mirrors in NL That is what "apt-get source" always has done. It asks for the package source. I think you wanted "apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source " regards, randy > -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel module eeprom causing system freeze
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:26:29AM +, Koen Tavernier wrote: > The package lm-sensors uses the eeprom module to get temperature > readings from motherboard sensors. No, the eeprom module is not involved in temperature monitoring. You need the eeprom module when e.g. you want to know the parameters of the memory modules you have installed. Gabor -- - MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nvidia-glx not updating
maybe your mirror is confused? its worth adding rdonalds archive to your apt.sources http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/index.php randall is the nvidia driver maintainer. Dean sigi wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:12:23AM +0100, Thomas Rösch wrote: For the last several days, nvidia-glx fails to upgrade with apt-get install nvidia-glx (or apt-get update): You must build the new nvidia-kernel-169.07 version of this package. Due a bug, already reported, you must have a link to fix a renaming problem: ln -s /usr/src/nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2 /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-source.tar.bz2 Now you can build the package. :-) here I couldn't even make apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source like I did always before. This now downloads the nvidia-graphics-drivers source package - is this the right way nowadays? I tried mirrors in NL and D - they both offered the graphics-drivers. Now I downloaded nvidia-kernel-source 169.07-2 directly from ftp.de.debian.org/debian and installed it via dpkg - and it worked. Created the above mentioned symlink and m-a a-i nvidia worked. Now I have some blurred areas under X11 - is this because new bugs in this sources, or was my method a bad idea? Regards, sigi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Corrupted Gnome terminal
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:36 -0600, Jack Schneider wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:11 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote: --snip-- > Tried the failsafe Gnome-Terminal, Terminal is fine when I login as > alternate-user, but when I login as myself it continues to fail...8-( > > Tried the strace procedure the Jurriaan suggested. and the diff > returned a null output. so it seems that starting gnome-terminal does > not give a traceable error.. unless I screwed up again...8-) > I hope I'm not interfering with your day... Thanks for your efforts and > guidance Ok, let's do a quick refresher so I can make sure we're both on the same page here: 1) Launching gnome-terminal through a failsafe xterm session works fine 2) Launching it as a different user in a regular gnome session works fine 3) Launching it as yourself in a regular gnome session or even a failsafe gnome session causes it to fail? 4) Using xterm or any other terminal emulator works fine And of the following, which have you/haven't you done already: 1) Removed all the gnome-terminal gconf settings 2) Done a purge of gnome-terminal followed by a reinstall (apt-get remove --purge gnome-terminal) Now, come to think of it, can you give some more details on what exactly is happening with the window? I know you said you can't close it, but does the terminal work ok otherwise? After you open the terminal, can you actually type commands, get output, etc? Do the drop-down menus at the top work if you click on them? If you click the close button at the top of the window does Gnome give you the "force quit" dialog? If you can provide a screenshot of the terminal in the hung state that would also be helpful. -- Alex Malinovich Support Free Software, delete your Windows partition TODAY! Encrypted mail preferred. You can get my public key from any of the pgp.net keyservers. Key ID: A6D24837 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Corrupted Gnome terminal
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:11 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote: > > Also > > > > when I started gnome-terminal from that point it gave me a completely > > working terminal... I tried to capture the profile as the default and > > restarted my normal login... No Improvemnt > > Well, this tells us that, most likely, the problem doesn't lie with > gnome-terminal itself, but rather with some other application that's > running in your session. The next step would be to try to log into a > failsafe gnome session and see if it works there. That'll just start up > gnome with none of your personal settings applied. > > If it works fine there, then it's time to start really digging. At that > point, you can try the strace approach that Jurriaan mentioned and see > if it helps. If you have a conflict with another program the strace > should show you where the problem lies (if you can read the output that > is. It's a bit of an acquired skill...) > > p.s. I'm subscribed to the list so you don't have to do a Reply To All > when responding. As it looks like you're using Evolution you can just do > "Reply to List" (Ctrl+L is the default, I believe), and it will take > care of the rest for you. > Hi, Alex Tried the failsafe Gnome-Terminal, Terminal is fine when I login as alternate-user, but when I login as myself it continues to fail...8-( Tried the strace procedure the Jurriaan suggested. and the diff returned a null output. so it seems that starting gnome-terminal does not give a traceable error.. unless I screwed up again...8-) I hope I'm not interfering with your day... Thanks for your efforts and guidance Jack -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nvidia-glx not updating
Hi, On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:12:23AM +0100, Thomas Rösch wrote: > >> For the last several days, nvidia-glx fails to upgrade with apt-get >> install nvidia-glx (or apt-get update): > > You must build the new nvidia-kernel-169.07 version of this package. Due a > bug, already reported, you must have a link to fix a renaming problem: > > ln -s /usr/src/nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2 /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-source.tar.bz2 > > Now you can build the package. :-) here I couldn't even make apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source like I did always before. This now downloads the nvidia-graphics-drivers source package - is this the right way nowadays? I tried mirrors in NL and D - they both offered the graphics-drivers. Now I downloaded nvidia-kernel-source 169.07-2 directly from ftp.de.debian.org/debian and installed it via dpkg - and it worked. Created the above mentioned symlink and m-a a-i nvidia worked. Now I have some blurred areas under X11 - is this because new bugs in this sources, or was my method a bad idea? Regards, sigi. -- --- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **| | |: :' : The universal|My GPG/PGP-Key-ID:| |`. `' Operating System |0xB4C7DE55| | `-http://www.debian.org/| | |-| | Please note that according to the German law on data retention, | | information on every electronic information exchange with me is | | retained for a period of six months.| --- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[SOLVED] Re: apt-get problem
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Don Montgomery wrote: that sounds like a good idea; perhaps I could google up "proxy package" and find out what might be there? Well given you had files named anon-proxy, then it is probably this package: anon-proxy - Proxy to surf the web anonymously So 'apt-get remove --purge anon-proxy' That should clean it out thoroughly. -- Len Sorensen Len, Based on output from 'apt-cache search --names-only proxy' I ran 'apt-get remove --purge anon-proxy privoxy' and then the output from 'grep 4001 -r /etc/' revealed no further http proxy entries. apt-get update works fine now, and my system is updating even as I write this. Thank you, everyone, for all of your help and patience. Don -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Don Montgomery wrote: > that sounds like a good idea; perhaps I could google up > "proxy package" and find out what might be there? Well given you had files named anon-proxy, then it is probably this package: anon-proxy - Proxy to surf the web anonymously So 'apt-get remove --purge anon-proxy' That should clean it out thoroughly. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get problem
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:50:58AM -0600, Don Montgomery wrote: > For discontinuing the proxy, I guess I can go into > /etc/rc*.d/* and comment out all the lines mentioning port > 4001; would reboot be necessary after that? Otherwise, > how would one go about fixing the proxy so that it does > work? The env files in /etc is what sets the http_proxy/HTTP_PROXY environment variables. That's what has to be changed to make things stop looking for the proxy. Stopping the proxy will only makes things worse if things are still trying to use it. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mute key not working anymore on T61
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:43:28PM +0100, Cyril Jaquier wrote: > Since a few days (weeks?), my mute key does not work anymore. Volume up > and down work as expected. xev just says nothing while pressing this > key. I reported this here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460564 > > However, I can't remember if the mute key used to generate an ACPI event > or was monitored by thinkpad-keys!? > > Dear Lenovo T61 users, do you have a working mute key under unstable? I think I saw some lenovo thinkpad acpi discussions on LKML a few days ago involving the mute key. Might be worth looking that up. I know it was sometime in the last 4 days. http://groups.google.ca/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/9336308b2f32816e/fbf3c13bad7f8231?lnk=st&q=lenovo+mute+acpi+linux#fbf3c13bad7f8231 I searched for 'lenovo mute acpi linux' on google groups which found it. It appears to be a change in 2.6.23 that causes the problem. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]