Re: [ Experimental ] Debian kernel 2.6.28.7 amd64
> > I guess I just spoiled the secret... > thanks ill try that.! Cav
Re: stupid question about shmmax, shmmni and shmall...
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Hello, I am trying to run a demanding quantum chemistry program on a
cluster
of multiprocessor machines. Each machine has 2 dual-core opterons and
16Gb
of RAM, and is running a 64 bit kernel (currently 2.6.26) and userspace
(lenny) system. Interprocess communications among processes on the same
node go via shared memory (a lot of it), hence I need to set it to the
maximum possible.
The shared memory IPC could also be done thru mmap calls with
appropriate parameters (a real common open file descriptor, MAP_SHARED,
)
I believe you won't have real size limitation but I would suggest to
have the mmap-ing fit into RAM.
Of course, you have to synchronize your processes using some different
mechanism (pipes, sockets, IPC semaphores semget & semop, Posix
semaphores, ...) or even maybe mutex inside the common shared mmap-ed
memory
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: 32 bit pkg on amd64
Hi try install ia32-libs ia32-libs-gtk lib32asound2 lib32gcc1 lib32ncurses5 lib32stdc++6 lib32z1 util-linux audcity and follow the suggestion from "Bin Zhang" : - I use the package from http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/ Best regards, Bin - I did it and sype is Ok now mac > Goswin, > > Hi, thanks for all your work, I have installd ia32-apt-get and modify de /etc/apt/foregin/sources.list to have the skype repo, I also > include it in the /etc/apt/sources.list > > refugio:~# apt-get update |grep skype > apt-get: update > Ign http://download.skype.com stable Release.gpg > Ign http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Translation-en_US > Ign http://download.skype.com stable Release > Ign http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Packages > > but apt-get install skype > > refugio:~# apt-get install skype > apt-get: install skype > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Package skype is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source > E: Package skype has no installation candidate > > There is something more I need to know? > > Thanks > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> macdowell@dpf.gov.br writes: >>> Hello, >>> where did get ia32-apt-get, please ? I only found ia32-libs. >>> hp:/home/mac# apt-get install ia32-apt-get >>> Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto >>> Construindo árvore de dependências >>> Lendo informação de estado... Pronto >>> E: Impossível achar pacote ia32-apt-get >>> thanks >>> mac >> % rmadison ia32-apt-get >> ia32-apt-get | 11 | unstable | amd64 >> Due to weeks of delayin the NEW queue there wasn't enough time left to do even half way decent testing in time for the Lenny release so it is unstable only. >> MfG >> Goswin >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> listmas...@lists.debian.org > > > > -- > Perhaps the depth of love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are actively involved in a given relationship. > > Carl Sagan (Contact) > > Jaime Ochoa Malagón > Arquitecto de Soluciones > Cel: +52 (55) 1021 0774 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: 32 bit pkg on amd64
Jaime Ochoa Malagón writes: > Goswin, > > Hi, thanks for all your work, I have installed ia32-apt-get and modify > de /etc/apt/foregin/sources.list to have the skype repo, I also > include it in the /etc/apt/sources.list How does the full entry for skype look like? > refugio:~# apt-get update |grep skype > apt-get: update > Ign http://download.skype.com stable Release.gpg > Ign http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Translation-en_US > Ign http://download.skype.com stable Release > Ign http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Packages/DiffIndex > Hit http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Packages > > but apt-get install skype > > refugio:~# apt-get install skype > apt-get: install skype > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Package skype is not available, but is referred to by another package. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source > E: Package skype has no installation candidate > > There is something more I need to know? > > Thanks apt-cache search skype It probably got renamed to ia32-skype. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Amarok 2 - solved
On 2009-03-05, Christopher Judd wrote: > On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Christopher Judd wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I recently upgraded to stable and added kde4 and amarok >> 2.0.60+svn934288-1 from experimental. Kde4 works fine, althogh I had >> to manually migrate my kmail settings. Unfortunately, amorok (the >> main reason that I tried this) doesn't work. It crashes upon startup >> with the following output: >> > > Thanks to those who responded. I found the problem; gstreamer0.10-alsa > isn't listed as a dependency for the amarok package in experimental. > Once I installed it, amarok works fine. (it is not a amarok issue - amarok uses phonon which ahs several backends) Please file a bug against phonon-backend-gstreamer /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: stupid question about shmmax, shmmni and shmall...
I bookmarked a fairly decent description of these parameters a while back: http://www.puschitz.com/TuningLinuxForOracle.shtml#SettingSharedMemory Maybe you already know this, but you can also set these parameters in /etc/sysctl.conf. That way they persist between reboots, etc. -Ron- 2009-03-05_13:43:30-0500 Giacomo Mulas : > Hello, I am trying to run a demanding quantum chemistry program on a cluster > of multiprocessor machines. Each machine has 2 dual-core opterons and 16Gb > of RAM, and is running a 64 bit kernel (currently 2.6.26) and userspace > (lenny) system. Interprocess communications among processes on the same > node go via shared memory (a lot of it), hence I need to set it to the > maximum possible. > > Can somebody tell me what are the maximum supported values for shmmax, > shmmni and shmall (I know I can set them via /proc/sys/kernel pseudofiles) > or (even better!) tell me how I can calculate them? Is it likely that a > too large value of shmmax or the other two can cause applications to > segfault? > > Thanks in advance, > Giacomo Mulas > > -- > _ > > Giacomo Mulas > _ > > OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI > Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA) > > Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222 > Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916 > _ > > "When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are" > (Freddy Mercury) > _ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
stupid question about shmmax, shmmni and shmall...
Hello, I am trying to run a demanding quantum chemistry program on a cluster of multiprocessor machines. Each machine has 2 dual-core opterons and 16Gb of RAM, and is running a 64 bit kernel (currently 2.6.26) and userspace (lenny) system. Interprocess communications among processes on the same node go via shared memory (a lot of it), hence I need to set it to the maximum possible. Can somebody tell me what are the maximum supported values for shmmax, shmmni and shmall (I know I can set them via /proc/sys/kernel pseudofiles) or (even better!) tell me how I can calculate them? Is it likely that a too large value of shmmax or the other two can cause applications to segfault? Thanks in advance, Giacomo Mulas -- _ Giacomo Mulas _ OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA) Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222 Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916 _ "When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are" (Freddy Mercury) _ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
Russ Cook writes: > After a recent apt-get upgrade, my Sid system (AMD64) no longer will > run OpenOffice. I can't access my Word-formatted documents. > Running apt-cache showpkg openoffice.org (printout attached) > indicates broken package. Is this correct, or am I misinterpreting > the output? If correct, does anyone know the nature of the problem > and when it might be corrected? I found that using aptitude to upgrade recently, openoffice.org was broken but one solution proposed by aptitude was to uninstall "openoffice.org" while keeping all the other bits installed! My list of installed openoffice.org related packages is: , | $ uname -a | Linux xxx 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Jan 10 17:57:00 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux | $ dpkg --list openoffice* | grep ^ii | ii openoffice.org-base 1:3.0.1-4 OpenOffice.org office suite - database | ii openoffice.org-base-core 1:3.0.1-4 OpenOffice.org office suite -- libdba | ii openoffice.org-common1:3.0.1-4 OpenOffice.org office suite architecture ind | ii openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-4 OpenOffice.org office suite architecture dep | ii openoffice.org-evolution 1:3.0.1-4 Evolution Addressbook support for OpenOffice | ii openoffice.org-filter-binfilter 1:3.0.1-4 Legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5.2) for Ope | ii openoffice.org-gnome 1:3.0.1-4 GNOME Integration for OpenOffice.org (VFS, G | ii openoffice.org-gtk 1:3.0.1-4 GTK+ Integration for OpenOffice.org (Widgets | ii openoffice.org-help-en-gb1:2.4.1-17 English_british help for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-help-en-us1:2.4.1-17 English_american help for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-java-common 1:2.4.1-17 OpenOffice.org office suite Java support arc | ii openoffice.org-l10n-en-gb1:3.0.1-4 English_british language package for OpenOff | ii openoffice.org-math 1:3.0.1-4 OpenOffice.org office suite - equation edito | ii openoffice.org-style-crystal 1:3.0.1-4 Crystal symbol style for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-style-galaxy 1:3.0.1-4 Galaxy (Default) symbol style for OpenOffice | ii openoffice.org-style-hicontrast 1:3.0.1-4 Hicontrast symbol style for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-style-industrial 1:3.0.1-4 Industrial symbol style for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-style-tango 1:3.0.1-4 Tango symbol style for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us 1:3.0.1-3 English Thesaurus for OpenOffice.org | ii openoffice.org-writer1:3.0.1-4 OpenOffice.org office suite - word processor | ii openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5.0.2-2 Writer/Calc to LaTeX converter extension for ` The package openoffice.org itself is not installed! Openoffice.org works perfectly (well, it works as intended ;-) on my system although I must admit that I don't stress test it in any way as it's only a final recourse type of tool for when antiword doesn't give me what I need... Hope this helps, eric -- MC . -.. --- - ..-. .-. .- --. .- .- - ..- -.-. .-.. .- -.-. ..- -.- NL Professor Eric S Fraga, UCL, http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucecesf/ BF >++[>++>+++[<]>-]>++.>.<-.++.--. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
Russ Cook wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
What about reporting a bug? execute
Please not. The BTS is not a support forum, it is for actual bugs.
providing the actual problem you're facing ("it doesn't open document"
is a little too generic) and all other information you can gather
Well, if I interpret apt-cache showpkg right he doesn't seem to have
-writer
installed, so *of course* he cannot open word docs.
-> *user error.*
Grüße/Regards,
René
Perhaps it *is *user error, but I took no explicit action to remove
any modules, and the Open Office
did work previously. It was my understanding that apt-get upgrade
never removes packages, so
I thought perhaps there was a disconnect in the package structure of
openoffice for Sid.
Is there a metapackage that will reinstall all basic functionality of
the openoffice suite (writer,
spreadsheet, presentation) or must I now research the missing
components and manually install?
I was under the (mis)understanding that running apt-get install
install openoffice.org would do
this, but it does not (for me).
It appears that running "sudo apt-get install openoffice.org-writer"
will install this missing module,
plus several others (output attached) and I will do this momentarily.
But I don't understand why
the modules went AWOL in the first place.
Maybe it's just one of the joys an unsophisticated Debian user should
expect when running the
unstable distribution. I rarely have problems like this.
Thanks for the responses!
Running "sudo apt-get install --reinstall openoffice.org"
appears to be fixing the problem. Thanks for all replies.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
Russ Cook wrote: > Perhaps it *is *user error, but I took no explicit action to remove any > modules, and the Open Office > did work previously. It was my understanding that apt-get upgrade never > removes packages, so But dist-upgrade does. > I thought perhaps there was a disconnect in the package structure of > openoffice for Sid. Yep, there was, it was uninstallable for a bit of time. > Is there a metapackage that will reinstall all basic functionality of > the openoffice suite (writer, > spreadsheet, presentation) or must I now research the missing components > and manually install? man apt-cache? (apt-get install openoffice.org) > I was under the (mis)understanding that running apt-get install install > openoffice.org would do > this, but it does not (for me). It does. (assuming you really don't have -writer installed). > Maybe it's just one of the joys an unsophisticated Debian user should > expect when running the > unstable distribution. I rarely have problems like this. Jup. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
What about reporting a bug? execute
Please not. The BTS is not a support forum, it is for actual bugs.
providing the actual problem you're facing ("it doesn't open document"
is a little too generic) and all other information you can gather
Well, if I interpret apt-cache showpkg right he doesn't seem to have -writer
installed, so *of course* he cannot open word docs.
-> *user error.*
Grüße/Regards,
René
Perhaps it *is *user error, but I took no explicit action to remove any
modules, and the Open Office
did work previously. It was my understanding that apt-get upgrade never
removes packages, so
I thought perhaps there was a disconnect in the package structure of
openoffice for Sid.
Is there a metapackage that will reinstall all basic functionality of
the openoffice suite (writer,
spreadsheet, presentation) or must I now research the missing components
and manually install?
I was under the (mis)understanding that running apt-get install install
openoffice.org would do
this, but it does not (for me).
It appears that running "sudo apt-get install openoffice.org-writer"
will install this missing module,
plus several others (output attached) and I will do this momentarily.
But I don't understand why
the modules went AWOL in the first place.
Maybe it's just one of the joys an unsophisticated Debian user should
expect when running the
unstable distribution. I rarely have problems like this.
Thanks for the responses!
Script started on Thu 05 Mar 2009 12:39:26 PM CST
Reading package lists... 0%
Reading package lists... 100%
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... 50%
Building dependency tree... 50%
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... 0%
Reading state information... 0%
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
gs-esp
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
gcj-4.3-base libbackport-util-concurrent-java libcommons-codec-java
libdom4j-java libgcj-bc
libgcj-common libgcj9-0 libgcj9-jar libhyphen0 libicu38 libjaxen-java
libjaxme-java
libjaxp1.3-java libjaxp1.3-java-gcj libjdom1-java libneon27 libraptor1
librasqal1 librdf0
libsaxonb-java libxerces2-java libxerces2-java-gcj libxom-java libxpp2-java
libxpp3-java
openoffice.org-base-core openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-core
openoffice.org-emailmerge
openoffice.org-filter-binfilter openoffice.org-java-common openoffice.org-math
openoffice.org-style-andromeda openoffice.org-style-galaxy
openoffice.org-writer2latex
python-uno raptor-utils redland-utils uno-libs3 ure
Suggested packages:
libdom4j-java-doc libgcj9-dbg libgcj9-0-awt libsaxonb-java-doc
libxerces2-java-doc
libxom-java-doc openoffice.org-base openoffice.org-style-industrial
openoffice.org-style-hicontrast bsh openoffice.org-gcj cli-uno-bridge
Recommended packages:
openoffice.org-style-tango openoffice.org-style-crystal
The following NEW packages will be installed:
gcj-4.3-base libbackport-util-concurrent-java libcommons-codec-java
libdom4j-java libgcj-bc
libgcj-common libgcj9-0 libgcj9-jar libhyphen0 libicu38 libjaxen-java
libjaxme-java
libjaxp1.3-java libjaxp1.3-java-gcj libjdom1-java libneon27 libraptor1
librasqal1 librdf0
libsaxonb-java libxerces2-java libxerces2-java-gcj libxom-java libxpp2-java
libxpp3-java
openoffice.org-base-core openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-emailmerge
openoffice.org-filter-binfilter openoffice.org-java-common openoffice.org-math
openoffice.org-style-galaxy openoffice.org-writer openoffice.org-writer2latex
python-uno
raptor-utils redland-utils uno-libs3 ure
The following packages will be upgraded:
openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-style-andromeda
2 upgraded, 39 newly installed, 0 to remove and 46 not upgraded.
Need to get 140MB of archives.
After this operation, 351MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n
Abort.
Script done on Thu 05 Mar 2009 12:39:31 PM CST
Re: Amarok 2 - solved
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Christopher Judd wrote: > Hi, > > I recently upgraded to stable and added kde4 and amarok > 2.0.60+svn934288-1 from experimental. Kde4 works fine, althogh I had > to manually migrate my kmail settings. Unfortunately, amorok (the > main reason that I tried this) doesn't work. It crashes upon startup > with the following output: > Thanks to those who responded. I found the problem; gstreamer0.10-alsa isn't listed as a dependency for the amarok package in experimental. Once I installed it, amarok works fine. -Chris IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> What about reporting a bug? execute
Please not. The BTS is not a support forum, it is for actual bugs.
> providing the actual problem you're facing ("it doesn't open document"
> is a little too generic) and all other information you can gather
Well, if I interpret apt-cache showpkg right he doesn't seem to have -writer
installed, so *of course* he cannot open word docs.
-> user error.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
Hi, Russ Cook wrote: > After a recent apt-get upgrade, my Sid system (AMD64) no longer will run > OpenOffice. What does OpenOffice.org (yes, really!) say? Or something else when you try to start it? > I can't access my Word-formatted documents. Running apt-cache showpkg > openoffice.org > (printout attached) indicates broken package. Is this correct, or am I Where, please? What puzzles me in the outout - do you really have none of the modules installed (e.g. -writer)? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: 32 bit pkg on amd64
Goswin, Hi, thanks for all your work, I have installed ia32-apt-get and modify de /etc/apt/foregin/sources.list to have the skype repo, I also include it in the /etc/apt/sources.list refugio:~# apt-get update |grep skype apt-get: update Ign http://download.skype.com stable Release.gpg Ign http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Translation-en_US Ign http://download.skype.com stable Release Ign http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://download.skype.com stable/non-free Packages but apt-get install skype refugio:~# apt-get install skype apt-get: install skype Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package skype is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package skype has no installation candidate There is something more I need to know? Thanks On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > macdowell@dpf.gov.br writes: > >> Hello, >> >> where did get ia32-apt-get, please ? I only found ia32-libs. >> >> hp:/home/mac# apt-get install ia32-apt-get >> Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto >> Construindo árvore de dependências >> Lendo informação de estado... Pronto >> E: Impossível achar pacote ia32-apt-get >> >> thanks >> >> mac > > % rmadison ia32-apt-get > ia32-apt-get | 11 | unstable | amd64 > > Due to weeks of delayin the NEW queue there wasn't enough time left to > do even half way decent testing in time for the Lenny release so it is > unstable only. > > MfG > Goswin > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > > -- Perhaps the depth of love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are actively involved in a given relationship. Carl Sagan (Contact) Jaime Ochoa Malagón Arquitecto de Soluciones Cel: +52 (55) 1021 0774 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [ Experimental ] Debian kernel 2.6.28.7 amd64
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 09:20 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > Actually they are fine for out of kernel modules too, as long as you > know how to find (or make) the kbuild package needed. I have been running > 2.6.28 for months now using the experimental kernel, and compiled out > of tree modules myself by simple creating the missing kbuild package. Which would be something like downloading the three kbuild files (diff.gz, dsc and tar.gz), running dpkg-source -x on the dsc file, and running dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot in the resulting directory. > I guess the kernel team figures if you can't make a little package > like that yourself, then you shouldn't be playing with experimental > kernels anyhow. I guess I just spoiled the secret... Koen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 16:37, Russ Cook wrote:
> After a recent apt-get upgrade, my Sid system (AMD64) no longer will run
> OpenOffice.
> I can't access my Word-formatted documents. Running apt-cache showpkg
> openoffice.org
> (printout attached) indicates broken package. Is this correct, or am I
> misinterpreting the
> output? If correct, does anyone know the nature of the problem and when it
> might be
> corrected?
What about reporting a bug? execute
$ reportbug openoffice.org
providing the actual problem you're facing ("it doesn't open document"
is a little too generic) and all other information you can gather
(strace oowriter , $HOME/.xsession-errors, to name 2) so that
maitainer would be aware of the problem, and help you fix it.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
OpenOffice.org broken in AMD64 Sid?
After a recent apt-get upgrade, my Sid system (AMD64) no longer will run OpenOffice. I can't access my Word-formatted documents. Running apt-cache showpkg openoffice.org (printout attached) indicates broken package. Is this correct, or am I misinterpreting the output? If correct, does anyone know the nature of the problem and when it might be corrected? Thanks for any info. Regards, Russ Package: openoffice.org Versions: 1:3.0.1-4+b1 (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages MD5: 3a3a669d7923ec519e9788b950a32978 Reverse Depends: openoffice.org-writer,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-common,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-core,openoffice.org 1.9 unoconv,openoffice.org ttf-opensymbol,openoffice.org 1.1.1+1.1.2rc3 openoffice.org-writer,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-voikko,openoffice.org 1:3.0.1~ openoffice.org-thesaurus-sk,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-ru,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-ne,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-it,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-hu,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-au,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-de-ch,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-de,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-thesaurus-cs,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-qa-ui-tests,openoffice.org 1:2.4.0~ooh680 openoffice.org-qa-tools,openoffice.org 1:3.0.1 openoffice.org-math,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-l10n-za,openoffice.org openoffice.org-l10n-in,openoffice.org openoffice.org-impress,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-hyphenation-zu,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-sl,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-lt,openoffice.org 1.1.4 openoffice.org-hyphenation-it,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-hu,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-de,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-hyphenation-af,openoffice.org 1.0.3 openoffice.org-draw,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-core,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-common,openoffice.org 1.9 openoffice.org-calc,openoffice.org 1.9 openclipart-openoffice.org,openoffice.org myspell-uk,openoffice.org myspell-th,openoffice.org 1.9.126 myspell-sw,openoffice.org myspell-sv-se,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-sv-se,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-sl,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-sk,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-sk,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-ru,openoffice.org myspell-pt-pt,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-pt-pt,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-pt-br,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-pt-br,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-pl,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-pl,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-lv,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-lv,openoffice.org myspell-lt,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-ku,openoffice.org myspell-it,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-hy,openoffice.org myspell-hu,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-hu,openoffice.org myspell-hr,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-gv,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-gd,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-ga,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-ga,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-fr-gut,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-fr,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-fo,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-fo,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-fi,openoffice.org myspell-et,openoffice.org myspell-es,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-es,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-eo,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-eo,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-en-za,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-en-us,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-en-gb,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-en-au,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-el-gr,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-el-gr,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-de-de-oldspell,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-de-de-oldspell,openoffice.org myspell-de-de,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-de-de,openoffice.org myspell-de-ch,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-de-ch,openoffice.org myspell-de-at,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-de-at,openoffice.org myspell-da,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-da,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-cs-cz,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-ca,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-ca,openoffice.org 1.0.3-3 myspell-bg,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 myspell-bg,openoffice.org myspell-af,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 kdissert,openoffice.org kdissert,openoffice.org hunspell-vi,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 hunspell-ne,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 hunspell-hu,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 hunspell-gl-es,openoffice.org 1.0.3-2 hunspell-f
Re: Test
On Thursday 05 March 2009 14:35:24 Nuno Magalhães wrote: > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct > Please do not ignore. I've been trying to send mail to Debian lists for more than a month. The Debian lists admin has ignored my e-mail. This has been coming back.. " Recipient address rejected: Mail appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to correct HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org " * My ISP can find nothing wrong anywhere * I am not a spammer I am not blacklisted I have worked on the Debian project since 1993 and the RedHat project and Slackware and the others. I have helped Alan Cox and Linus Torvalds and many others. Too many to mention here. Faced with the fact that no one over at the Debian project wants a list to work at all I can only work at a snails pace to try to find a fault or configuration error somewhere. This is not helped by someone who prefers to be rude and unhelpful rather than help out. -- Richard www.sheflug.org.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Test
Please ignore -- Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Test
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct Please do not ignore. Nuno Magalhães LU#484677 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [ Experimental ] Debian kernel 2.6.28.7 amd64
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:46:17PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > They're not very useful if you need out of tree modules, and the kernel > team doesn't seem very interested in this as an issue. If you don't, > they're probably fine. Actually they are fine for out of kernel modules too, as long as you know how to find (or make) the kbuild package needed. I have been running 2.6.28 for months now using the experimental kernel, and compiled out of tree modules myself by simple creating the missing kbuild package. I guess the kernel team figures if you can't make a little package like that yourself, then you shouldn't be playing with experimental kernels anyhow. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Architecture usertags
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:52:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > so that maintainers could apply them to architecture-specific bugs when > necessary. The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the > usertag (e.g., 'debian-m...@lists.debian.org' as user, and 'm68k' as > tag). Armel has already been using something similar: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org&tag=eabi usertags would certainly be used a much more if there were a easy way to set/search them on BTS web interface. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Architecture usertags
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:52:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > After a short discussion on IRC, we came up with another option: a set > of publically documented usertags, the definition of which would be > announced on debian-devel-announce and linked to from the BTS homepage, > so that maintainers could apply them to architecture-specific bugs when > necessary. The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the > usertag (e.g., 'debian-m...@lists.debian.org' as user, and 'm68k' as > tag). For Alpha, there is already something like this, although with several tags documented here: http://wiki.debian.org/AlphaBugs Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Architecture usertags
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:22:19AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the > > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the > > usertag (e.g., 'debian-m...@lists.debian.org' as user, and 'm68k' as > > tag). > > Or debian-po...@lists.debian.org as user. I did not think that would be a good idea, since the AFAIK the bts will send out a mail to the mail address listed as user when a usertag is set; it is okay if adding a 'powerpc' tag causes a mail to be sent to the powerpc mailinglist; I do not think it is okay if that would cause a mail to be sent to _all_ porter mailinglists. -- Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Architecture usertags
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the > usertag (e.g., 'debian-m...@lists.debian.org' as user, and 'm68k' as > tag). Or debian-po...@lists.debian.org as user. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [ Experimental ] Debian kernel 2.6.28.7 amd64
... make-kpkg is your friend in compiling vanilla kernels I recently compiled 2.6.29-rc6 from git rep without problems (just commented 3 lines involving the $WERROR stuffs in the Makefile) I wonder why out of tree kernel modules could be an issue regards r 2009/3/4 Stephen Gran > This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:29:51PM -0500, Ghost Kilah wrote: > > > Debian amd64 kernel packages > > > Download from here : http://debian.unixcod.org > > > > > > linux-headers-2.6.28.7-unixcod_amd64.deb > > > linux-image-2.6.28.7-unixcod_amd64.deb > > > > The debian kernel team provides experimental kernels at > > deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel trunk main > > > > If you want an experimental kernel, I suggest you > > try those instead. > > They're not very useful if you need out of tree modules, and the kernel > team doesn't seem very interested in this as an issue. If you don't, > they're probably fine. > -- > - > | ,''`.Stephen Gran | > | : :' :sg...@debian.org | > | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | > |`- http://www.debian.org | > - > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFJrwS5SYIMHOpZA44RApZ/AKCpI0CdshlqsPnlgumNAeqDhVbGqACgszM7 > tyVgMYZ/DjEt/ByFJ8FOJBs= > =ZVoX > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >
