Re: Xorg problems after the last upgrade

2006-09-28 Thread Martin Jambor

On 9/28/06, Martin Jambor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

after yesterdays update  (sid on amd64) my fluxbox  and kdm are unable
to write  any text to  many places such  as window title bars  and the
bottom status bar. Furthermore (and more importantly!) my aterm cannot
use  my colors  defined in  /etc/X11/rgb.txt. Xorg  log looks  fine. I
tried   reinstalling   xfs,   reconfiguring   xorg(manually   and   by
dpkg-reconfigure), all  that I  could think of  but with no  luck. Any
ideas?


I upgraded kernel to 2.6.18 and NVidia stuff to a version supportinx
Xorg 7.1 and got my fonts back. However, /etc/X11/rgb.txt is still
ignored even  when I explicitly set the path. I guess I'll file a bug
then...

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Xorg problems after the last upgrade

2006-09-28 Thread Martin Jambor

Hi,

after yesterdays update  (sid on amd64) my fluxbox  and kdm are unable
to write  any text to  many places such  as window title bars  and the
bottom status bar. Furthermore (and more importantly!) my aterm cannot
use  my colors  defined in  /etc/X11/rgb.txt. Xorg  log looks  fine. I
tried   reinstalling   xfs,   reconfiguring   xorg(manually   and   by
dpkg-reconfigure), all  that I  could think of  but with no  luck. Any
ideas?

TIA

Martin

The xorg log file:
--
X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: UNKNOWN
Current Operating System: Linux cetus 2.6.16.14mj01 #1 PREEMPT Mon May
8 15:40:33 CEST 2006 x86_64
Build Date: 07 July 2006
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Sep 28 12:42:39 2006
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "Generic Monitor"
(**) |   |-->Device "Generic Video Card"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard"
(**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
(**) XKB: model: "pc104"
(**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
(**) XKB: layout: "us"
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse"
(**) FontPath set to:
unix/:7100,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/encodings,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/util,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc,
/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,
/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/TTF/,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/OTF,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/CID/,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
(==) RgbPath set to "${prefix}/share/X11/rgb"
(**) ModulePath set to
"/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dirvers,/usr/X11R6/lib/modules,/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
(**) Ignoring ABI Version
(WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory)
(II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel
(II) Module ABI versions:
X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3
X.Org Video Driver: 1.0
X.Org XInput driver : 0.6
X.Org Server Extension : 0.3
X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: "bitmap"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libbitmap.so
(II) Module bitmap: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: X.Org Font Renderer
ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.5
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: "pcidata"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libpcidata.so
(II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.1.1, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0
(--) using VT number 9

(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 10de,00e1 card 1043,813f rev a1 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 10de,00e0 card 1043,813f rev a2 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:01:1: chip 10de,00e4 card 1043,813f rev a1 class 0c,05,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 10de,00e7 card 1043,813f rev a1 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:02:1: chip 10de,00e7 card 1043,813f rev a1 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:02:2: chip 10de,00e8 card 1043,813f rev a2 class 0c,03,20 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:05:0: chip 10de,00df card 1043,80a7 rev a2 class 06,80,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:08:0: chip 10de,00e5 card 1043,813f rev a2 class 01,01,8a hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 10de,00e3 card 1043,813f rev a2 class 01,01,85 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:0b:0: chip 10de,00e2 card , rev a2 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:0e:0: chip 10de,00ed card , rev a2 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1100 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1101 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1102 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:18:3: chip 1022,1103 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 10de,0326 card 1462,9982 rev a1 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:07:0: chip 10ec,8139 card 10ec,8139 rev 10 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:08:0: chip 1814,0201 card 1814,2560 rev 01 class 02,80,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:0a:

Re: Shutdown problem on Tyan S2875 opteron SMP

2006-09-16 Thread Martin Jambor

On 9/16/06, garrone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:57:44AM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/16/06, garrone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >The command "shutdown -h" does not completely poweroff the system
> >> >for kernels 2.6.11, 2.6.12, and 2.6.16. However 2.6.8 does
> >> >turn off as it should!
> >>
> >Thanks. I was momentarily excited that 2.6.8 worked but the others
> >didnt, suggesting that the problem was with the linux kernel rather
> >than the board. However the situation where some kernel versions
> >work and others don't now suggests to me that the problem is more likely
> >to be with the board than the kernel. The linux code seems to follow
> >the standard pretty closely. I tried 2.6.17 and that does
> >not work either. I am running bios 3.03.
>
> Maybe I am stating the obvious, but have you had a look at and
> compared  the configurations of the kernels that do and don't work?
>
> I run vanilla kernels and whenever such problems arise (on both amd64
> and i386) it is most certainly my configuration error, not a kernel
> version issue (there have been exceptions like burning through ATA
> etc. though).
>
> HTH
>
> Martin

So what configuration options do you mean? When I debugged a failing
2.6.12, my debug statements were definitely being executed
at the point where it was supposed to stop.
I did briefly look at the configuration, but didnt see anything.
These are standard debian pre-packaged images as well.
The ACPI config from zless /proc/config.gz | grep ACPI is

CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=y
# ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
CONFIG_ACPI_HOTKEY=m
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y
CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS=m
CONFIG_ACPI_IBM=m
CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER=m
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI=y
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI=y
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m
# CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF is not set
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=m
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI_IBM=m
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_ACPI=y

It all looks pretty set to me.


Yeah, it really looks good. Any differences between the 2.6.8 config?

I also recall encountering a motherboard that wouldn't shut down with
ACPI and needed APM, didn't it go away?

HTH

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Shutdown problem on Tyan S2875 opteron SMP

2006-09-16 Thread Martin Jambor

Hi,

On 9/16/06, garrone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >The command "shutdown -h" does not completely poweroff the system
> >for kernels 2.6.11, 2.6.12, and 2.6.16. However 2.6.8 does
> >turn off as it should!
>
Thanks. I was momentarily excited that 2.6.8 worked but the others
didnt, suggesting that the problem was with the linux kernel rather
than the board. However the situation where some kernel versions
work and others don't now suggests to me that the problem is more likely
to be with the board than the kernel. The linux code seems to follow
the standard pretty closely. I tried 2.6.17 and that does
not work either. I am running bios 3.03.


Maybe I am stating the obvious, but have you had a look at and
compared  the configurations of the kernels that do and don't work?

I run vanilla kernels and whenever such problems arise (on both amd64
and i386) it is most certainly my configuration error, not a kernel
version issue (there have been exceptions like burning through ATA
etc. though).

HTH

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Gkrellm mail checker & SSL?

2006-09-15 Thread Martin Jambor

Hi,

what packages do I have to have installed in order to be able to check
mail through SSL with gkrellm2? I went through aptitude and verified I
have OpenSSL installed and installed some crypto libraries but with no
luck.

This is the state of *ssl* packages on my system:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l '*ssl*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
un  apache-ssl  (no description available)
ii  docbook-dsssl  1.79-4 modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets, for print
un  docbook-dsssl-  (no description available)
un  fetchmail-ssl   (no description available)
un  gnustep-ssl (no description available)
ii  libio-socket-s 0.999-1Perl module implementing object oriented int
ii  libnet-ssleay- 1.30-1 Perl module for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)
un  libopenssl-rub  (no description available)
un  libssl  (no description available)
ii  libssl-dev 0.9.8b-2   SSL development libraries, header files and
ii  libssl0.9.70.9.7i-1   SSL shared libraries
ii  libssl0.9.80.9.8b-2   SSL shared libraries
un  libssl08-dev(no description available)
un  libssl09-dev(no description available)
un  libssl095a-dev  (no description available)
un  libssl096-dev   (no description available)
un  libwww-ssl0 (no description available)
ii  libxmlsec1-ope 1.2.9-5Openssl engine for the XML security library
ii  openssl0.9.8b-2   Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related
ii  ssl-cert   1.0.13 Simple debconf wrapper for openssl
un  ssleay  (no description available)
un  w3m-ssl (no description available)
un  wget-ssl(no description available)
un  zmailer-ssl (no description available)

and *crypto* packages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l '*crypto*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
un  libcrypto++5.2  (no description available)
un  libcrypto++5.2  (no description available)
ii  libcrypto++5.2 5.2.1c2a-3 General purpose cryptographic shared library
un  m2crypto(no description available)
ii  python-m2crypt 0.16-1.1   a crypto and SSL toolkit for Python
un  python2.3-m2cr  (no description available)
un  python2.4-m2cr  (no description available)

On my i386 notebook the gkrellm has no problem usig SSL and I have
pretty much the same stuff installed (or even less).

Thank you very much in advance,

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ·D acceleration on a 32bit chroot

2006-09-09 Thread Martin Jambor

On 9/9/06, Guillermo Movia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

PS: I wish to try the Google Earth, but ir seems don't work in Debian 64.


It does, you just need to install the ia32-libs package.

HTH

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: chroot and ia32libs combined

2006-09-07 Thread Martin Jambor

On 9/6/06, Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm in the same situation with Firefox as you are, but do not see the
extension compatibility wizard kicking in.  The danger I see is the 64-bit
and 32-bit versions modifying ~/.mozilla differently, which may mess the
files up at some point.


As far as  Firefox is concerned, I have never  actually managed to run
the 32  bit and 64 bit  version concurrently, somehow  whichever I run
second just opens a new window of the first.

OTOH, one can do stuff like this in your /etc/fstab, even though it is
quite cumbersome:

/home/user/.ia32-mozilla  /var/chroot/sid-ia32/home/user/.mozilla
none  bind  0 0

HTH

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: thunderbird: Can someone reproduce #383344?

2006-08-30 Thread Martin Jambor

On 8/30/06, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?


 [1] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383344


I don't use thunderbird but it certainly starts ok on my AMD64.

HTH

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: New

2006-08-16 Thread Martin Jambor

On 8/16/06, Kv237 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I attempted to find an old ethernet adapter today, in order to install the 
AMD64 port of Sarge. But the only card I could find was a Zonet ZEN3200 
adapter. This adapter requires the driver rt18139.o, and that was not available 
in the ../kernel/drivers/net directory. And before you ask, I did look for a 
.ko extension as well.


I installed AMD64 using a network card with realtek 8139 chipset 10
months ago without any problems whatsoever. I just used the netinstall
CD as always, the card got autodetected properly.

Moreover, I think the drivers you should try are called 8139cp.ko and 8139too.ko

HTH

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Wolfenstein: E-T on debian amd64 with ATI X800 Pro gfx?

2006-08-12 Thread Martin Jambor

Hi,

On 8/12/06, Jesper Nyholm Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Particularly interesting is the error:

libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed 
(/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
directory)

but the file is there:

$ ls -al /usr/lib/dri/fglrx*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9559048 Aug 12 16:35 /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so

so I don't understand the error.


I don't know whether these things run with root privileges but if they
don't, the shared library is  not marked as executable (for anyone, in
fact).

Just my 2 cents,

Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]