Re: Installing Intel Fortran Compiler
Dňa Ut 12. September 2006 19:31 Lennart Sorensen napísal: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:00:20PM +, Jo?o Marcelo wrote: > > I'm trying to install Intel Fortran Compiler 9.1.036 on my Debian AMD64 > > Opteron Box. Unfortunely, i can't use gnu fortran to compile the > > application i want (http://www.cpmd.org/), because it needs the 'Cray > > Pointer' extension to Fortran 77 for dynamical memory management. > > According to > > http://www.theochem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~axel.kohlmeyer/cpmd-linux.html > > doesn't handle the above extension. So I have to use Intel's compiler, > > that is free of charge, but not open source :-( . > > > > During the installation process, the following message appears: > > > > The installation program was not able to detect the IA32 version of the > > following libraries installed : libstdc++ > > libgcc > > glibc > > > > Without these libraries, the compiler will not function properly. > > These libraries, if not installed, can be installed from > > the OS discs after finishing the compiler installation. > > Please refer to Release Notes for more information. > > > > Can I have both versions of glibc (64 and 32) installed? Any packages > > names? > > > > Thanks for your answers. > > I would have thought ia32-libs package would take care of those. Or you can use 64bit intel fortran, which is also free (the same conditions) - in the case you want the 64bit version of CMPD Milan Melichercik
Re: Etch security updates
Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:19:57AM +0100, Birju Prajapati wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to track down security updates for etch on AMD64 for my > > sources.list. > > The following entry does not seem to work: > > deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free > > Giving the error: > > Failed to fetch http://security.debian.org/dists/etch/updates/Release > > Unable to find expected entry main/binary-amd64/Packages in > > Meta-index file (malformed Release file?) > > And as expected, the Release file has no amd64 entry. Is there a plan > > to include AMD64 security updates in the etch package repository? Or > > am I just looking in the wrong place? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > The directory does not exist. It does for sarge. Could it be that no > etch security fixes have been made since amd64 packages started to enter > etch? > > Len Sorensen As far as I know the security updates for testing branch go through unstable branch with maximum priority (approx. 2 days till they get into the testing). If I'm wrong, please, correct me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [SOT] EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 16:51, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Milan Melichercik wrote: > > We will have (in our company) 2 pcs. of exactly the same model U > > mentioned. So probably I can later reffer - when they arrive... > > BTW: I have Epox MB at home (sock. A with nForce2) and no problem (and my > > friends have similar experiences). > > When U didn't hears about something it doesn't mean it is bad. Just it > > can be more specialised to some buyers... Or people for some (stupid) > > reason dont know them... As far as I know, epox MB are excellent > > especially for overclocking (similar or very slightly worse DFI Lanparty > > MB) - better than asus - no offence ;) > > Well I did say that it was probably too simplistic, but that it had > worked well for me. I think, I understand what U want to say... I wanted only to show that not frequently commented hw could be so bad, no one use it, or so good, there are no (or very little) problems. Or also there is no firm which distributes they. :) > > I personally have no interest in overclocking, but certainly from what I > have read most asus boards do rather well at it. To me it is probably > an indication that the board will be quite reliable at normal speeds, if > it is able to be fairly reliable out of spec. I prefer reliability over > speed though. me too - the only one system I ever overclocked was my Mobile Athlon XP - and it was only partly overclocked - higher FSB and equally lower multiplier so CPU core runned approximately on the same frequency. > > I suspect epox may just not be popular in my part of the world, which > may just mean they don't have a good distributer network here, while > just about every good computer store here will carry asus (and often msi > and gigabyte too). Personally, I don't like MSI very much - I know people, which has endless problems with MSI MB (on one case even with the 3th or 4th replaced MB). Gigabyte are quite good - from my point of view. And Asus is one of the best - but once my friend found on forums they could not be (sometimes) rockstable. On other hand the EPOXes were... (but it can be only the effect of smaller statistical set). So he bought Epox (exactly the same mentioned in the first mail in this thread) and he is satisfied (before he found this information he planed to buy some asus). So I suppose with Epox U won't have problems (probably as same as with the higher asus models) Milan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [SOT] EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 16:36, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:47:08AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote: > > I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a > > single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that > > concerns the EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra, or similar, Mainboard. > > I have never even heard of the brand. In my book that is a bad thing > since if I haven't heard of it, it is probably too obscure (at least in > this part of the world) to have particularly good support. Maybe too > simplistic a view, but it has served my well for many years when buying > computer hardware. We will have (in our company) 2 pcs. of exactly the same model U mentioned. So probably I can later reffer - when they arrive... BTW: I have Epox MB at home (sock. A with nForce2) and no problem (and my friends have similar experiences). When U didn't hears about something it doesn't mean it is bad. Just it can be more specialised to some buyers... Or people for some (stupid) reason dont know them... As far as I know, epox MB are excellent especially for overclocking (similar or very slightly worse DFI Lanparty MB) - better than asus - no offence ;) Milan > > > That makes me become suspicious. Am i the only one using this Board and > > if so why? What does everybody else know (about that Board), that keeps > > them from using it, that i don't? Or is it just my paranoia? > > I personalyl only buy Asus boards, and only the higher end models with > via or nvidia chipsets. > > > The only unsolved Issue i came across is its failure to cooperate with > > acpid. Which, presumably, can be dealt with by compiling a custom Kernel > > with apm support and using apmd instead of acpid. If one bothers to > > care. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dual opteron m/b: S2875ANRF vs. GA-7A8DW
On Thursday 24 February 2005 04:54, Max wrote: > Hello! > > I'm hesitating over a choice of a dual opteron motherboard. Currently I > consider two options: > > Tyan S2875ANRF http://tyan.com/products/html/tigerk8w_spec.html > and We have (at work) this mainboard and I must say it is perfect rock-stable piece. It is used for biomolecules simulations, so most time it has full load and till now without any problem (for 3 months). So I only can give the recommendation for this one. > Gigabyte GA-7A8DW > http://tw.giga-byte.com/Server/Products/Products_ServerBoard_GA-7A8DW.htm > > They are quite similar (including a price ;) though there are some > differences: > > 1. Form factor ATX vs. EATX (although Gigabyte claims "design to fit ATX > chassis screw hole", and I think it will fit my middle-tower). try to get size of MB ( e.g. from manual) and compare with your case... > > 2. Tyan's board has Intel 82541EI GbE LAN controller on-board while > Gigabyte's possess Broadcom BCM 5705 (which one is better?). I don't know which is better, but the intel works perfectly - although tested only on Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps) - no available 1 Gbps switch :( > > 3. Tyan has 5 PCI slots, Gigabyte - 2 PCI-X and 1 PCI (currently I don't > have any PCI-X devices). > > 4. Tyan has integrated Firewire controller (I use firewire sometimes, > currently with PCI controller). > > With respect to the features, I would prefer Tyan's board. But as a brand I > like Gigabyte better than Tyan: previously I've had some negative > experience with Tyan, and for more than a year I have been very pleased by > dual-athlon Gigabyte motherboard GA-7DPXDW-P. I know only about 2 Tyan MB in my neighbourhood - without any problem. But with one Gigabyte A64 (sock. 754) MB (K8VT800) we have serious problem - it cannot run with 2 DIMM double sided modules - but ram is problemfree - I don't know if it is problem with CPU or MB, but there are some people on forum.amd.com, which complain about same or very similar problem with gigabyte MB. :( Milan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Very, Very off-topic
On Po 13. December 2004 10:57, In The Night wrote: > I'm trying to find a RS232 Switch (If there is something like that). > I have a lot (3+) old Serial devices which I use daily, and I would like to > continue with it. When my Onboard NIC broke down I had to remove my old IO > card, and there is only 1 RS232 onboard. I googled, but only found > USB2Serial devices, and I don't believe that would work for me E.g. company Sunsway is making PCI cards with 1 or more (up to 6 I think) RS232 ports (http://www.sunsway.com.hk/) - it uses "ST Labs" name for their products. But I don't know nothing about the quality of these cards or company in general. I just hope, it could help U. ;) Milan
