RE: MAME? AMD64 not official?
> If there are any packages currently known to be broken, I > would love to know about it. Maybe I can fix a few (I have fixed a few > already when I found out about them, and the problem seemed simple). Gnome-system-monitor is broken (in combination with a ia32 chroot /home directory as per FAQ for OpenOffice)and the i386 port has a new version in proposed-packages that should work. Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl
Re: MAME? AMD64 not official?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Mike wrote: > I know this is an old issue, but we look like debian, smell like debian but > we are not? Is there anything we can do to have the rights of a real > debian distribution? It seems to me that we are except someone, somewhere > has to put his/her seal of approval. > > Come on already, what system should people buy these days? Intel and AMD > both offer 64bits, and I know that AMD64 was not at a premium at all. It's > all they offered! > > I think this AMD64 project has done a great job, and has earned the right > to be official, and would like to help. Last I saw I think most of the remaining issues are things the amd64 porters have basicly no influence on (ftp maintenance stuff and such). If there are any packages currently known to be broken, I would love to know about it. Maybe I can fix a few (I have fixed a few already when I found out about them, and the problem seemed simple). Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAME? AMD64 not official?
I know this is an old issue, but we look like debian, smell like debian but we are not? Is there anything we can do to have the rights of a real debian distribution? It seems to me that we are except someone, somewhere has to put his/her seal of approval. Come on already, what system should people buy these days? Intel and AMD both offer 64bits, and I know that AMD64 was not at a premium at all. It's all they offered! I think this AMD64 project has done a great job, and has earned the right to be official, and would like to help. MD - Original Message - From: "Lennart Sorensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kaare Hviid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:10 AM Subject: Re: MAME? On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:49:22AM +0200, Kaare Hviid wrote: Regular xmame 0.100 is in the non-free section of sid for most architectures. However, due to license restrictions, the amd64 mirror is unable to provide it at this time. If you're running sid, it does build out of the box without any problems from debian sources on amd64, albeit it takes an hour or two to build on my lowly box. It appears to run fine without any problems, but I'm not really a gamer... How lowly can any amd64 system be? Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAME?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:49:22AM +0200, Kaare Hviid wrote: > Regular xmame 0.100 is in the non-free section of sid for most > architectures. However, due to license restrictions, the amd64 mirror > is unable to provide it at this time. If you're running sid, it does > build out of the box without any problems from debian sources on amd64, > albeit it takes an hour or two to build on my lowly box. It appears to > run fine without any problems, but I'm not really a gamer... How lowly can any amd64 system be? Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAME?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:23:31PM +0200, antongiulio05 wrote: > > for my free time I thought to install mame, but in repository there is > 'xmame-common' not installable. Latest version is 0.100 (i'm not sure). Is > there a working repository for it? Regular xmame 0.100 is in the non-free section of sid for most architectures. However, due to license restrictions, the amd64 mirror is unable to provide it at this time. If you're running sid, it does build out of the box without any problems from debian sources on amd64, albeit it takes an hour or two to build on my lowly box. It appears to run fine without any problems, but I'm not really a gamer... -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAME?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:23:31PM +0200, antongiulio05 wrote: > for my free time I thought to install mame, but in repository there is > 'xmame-common' not installable. Latest version is 0.100 (i'm not sure). Is > there a working repository for it? Well for i386 I use: deb http://anarxia.dyndns.org/debian unstable main deb-src http://anarxia.dyndns.org/debian unstable main Perhaps using the source packages they will build on amd64. Not sure for amd64. I don't have one of those at home. :) Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAME?
Hi, for my free time I thought to install mame, but in repository there is 'xmame-common' not installable. Latest version is 0.100 (i'm not sure). Is there a working repository for it? Thank you very much, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
